This site has some of the worst moderation I have witnessed in a debate forum.

[Osborn F Enready]

Well, here I am again.

After leaving once in protest to moderation, I am back again being reminded why I left in the first place after only a few short days back.

Is anyone here familliar with the term selective enforcement?

That is what I see as the biggest problem on this site. As soon as something gets heated, debate gets intense, relative issues are brought up, mods step in and attempt to skew the entire argument.

I don't know WHAT the goal is of this site, but I can surely say it isn't debate, and the methods used are only keeping people from entering actual debate of all the relevant issues on a topic.

Maybe I will stay, maybe I will go, maybe I will be banned, but I surely know this site is a long shot away from where it once used to be and THAT IS A DAMN SHAME. The only thing I can see playing such a role is moderation and directives from the owner.

Consider this one entirely dissatisfied user of your "forum".

[Matt W]

Ahem.

Moderating issues and site policies may be addressed via private message only

[Jason]

As "the owner" I invite you to send me a clear, concise and persuasive message explaining the moderation problem you've found. Of course, if you're looking for me to understand your point of view it would not be wise to accuse me of giving unjust directives.