It's lovely that you think that way.I don't know who you mean by we. I am talking about you. Regardless of what you claim you are doing, your assessment of my arguments or your derogatory comments about women you are still constantly twisting my words, referring to arguments made well in the past in vague ways and generally debating in a intellectually dishonest manner.
My case is supported by the opinions of others (LetThereBe) for one, but I don't cite the alleged opinions of others as a defense to my arguments. Taking a leaf from your book, I could call up women who had abortions and ask them to claim that emotions cannot prevent someone from doing something. You have no substantiation to validate your arguments.I disagree with you in that you have been honest. I have given my opinion and you yours I have offered to support mine with the claims of others, but you deny they are honest and you have not supported your claims.
A person admitting that they did not do something that they did not want to do is not support of your claims, nor should it justify a legal system where we allow these people to take money from their ex-partners. I can claim that my emotions made "paying taxes" an impossible choice this year all I want, but I will still get in trouble with the IRS.I have offered support that you refused. You have not even offered support for your claims. You ignore the meat of my statement again in that it is not just my opinions.
The fact that abortions are legally available to pregnant women.And what do you have but your own opinions?