![]() |
|
| The Debate Forums | Blogs | | | Donate | Register (it's free) | Chatroom | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||||
|
| | Thread Tools |
| | #1 (permalink) (top) | |
![]() Hot Lava Posts: 1,124 | Breasts not for looking but pecs are okay Breasts not for looking but pecs are okay, say Court of Appeal - Telegraph Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) (top) |
| Altruism Assassin Location: Massachusetts Posts: 4,948 | No, silly, think lower, not higher, and this law is pretty convoluted, if you don't want people looking at you, you need a wall in between you and their eyes. “Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.” -Albert Einstein |
| | |
| | #6 (permalink) (top) |
| Altruism Assassin Location: Massachusetts Posts: 4,948 | No, just that if you're not comfortable being ogled, a natural reflex among the male population, you might want to never go out in public. Trust me, I'm not encouraging more clothes. “Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.” -Albert Einstein |
| | |
| | #7 (permalink) (top) | |
![]() Hot Lava Posts: 2,292 | Quote:
The difference I guess is that women are smart enough to be discreet about it. | |
| | |
| | #12 (permalink) (top) | |
![]() Hot Lava Posts: 2,292 | Quote:
Considering it is males that are creating the offensive act then would it not be more consistent to punish the male by making them wear blinders instead. | |
| | |
| | #13 (permalink) (top) | |
![]() BANNED Location: Ohio Province, Rep. of Comerica Posts: 7,320 | Quote:
I suppose, if you subscribe to that draconian view of punishing the innocent as well as the guilty. | |
| | |
| | #15 (permalink) (top) |
![]() Molten Ash Posts: 42 | Did anybody here read the article? The guy was videotaping another man in a changing room. I think it's pretty reasonable to ban secretly videotaping a bare-chested woman in a room which is specifically designated for changing in private. This article has nothing to do with checking out the rack on some girl with a skimpy shirt, and it certainly has nothing to do with the legality looking at a guy's pecs vs. looking at a girl's jugs when they're clothed and walking around. EDIT: Actually, I just re-read the article and it does talk a great deal about ogling male vs. female breasts. It's the case itself that has nothing to do with whether or not it's okay to check out girls vs. guys. Now I see where people were coming from. That being said, this case definitely did not make it illegal to ogle girls' breasts. Last edited by Tim; May 19, 2008 at 08:20 pm. |
| | |