Register (it's free)
Volconvo Debate Forums
Advertise Here »
Browse ad-free by donating
The Debate Forums Blogs | Donate Register (it's free) Chatroom Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read  
  Volconvo / Debate Forums / Society & Rights


This topic in Society & Rights is about Breasts not for looking but pecs are okay.

Reply  
 
Thread Tools
Old May 16, 2008, 02:50 pm   #1 (permalink) (top)
Arawn-ap-Hywel
Hot Lava
 
Posts: 1,124
Breasts not for looking but pecs are okay

Breasts not for looking but pecs are okay, say Court of Appeal - Telegraph


Quote:
It is perfectly legal to ogle a man's chest but not a woman's breasts, according to an unusual ruling on what constitutes voyeurism by a panel of leading judges at the Court of Appeal yesterday.
UK
Arawn-ap-Hywel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 16, 2008, 03:11 pm   #2 (permalink) (top)
Milton Bradley
BANNED
 
Location: Ohio Province, Rep. of Comerica
Posts: 7,320
How can anybody get you into court for ogling thier person?
Milton Bradley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 16, 2008, 05:31 pm   #3 (permalink) (top)
SoylentGreen
Hot Lava
 
SoylentGreen's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,292
Does that mean I have to look women in the eyes when I talk to them now?
SoylentGreen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 16, 2008, 06:26 pm   #4 (permalink) (top)
Gods_Mercenary
Altruism Assassin
 
Gods_Mercenary's Avatar
 
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,948
No, silly, think lower, not higher, and this law is pretty convoluted, if you don't want people looking at you, you need a wall in between you and their eyes.


“Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.”
-Albert Einstein
Gods_Mercenary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 16, 2008, 06:29 pm   #5 (permalink) (top)
SoylentGreen
Hot Lava
 
SoylentGreen's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,292
Quote:
Quote by: Gods_Mercenary View Post
No, silly, think lower, not higher, and this law is pretty convoluted, if you don't want people looking at you, you need a wall in between you and their eyes.
Ah! So you suggest that women wear a thick coat and leave it up to men's imagination rather than make it obvious as in todays clothing fashions.
SoylentGreen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 16, 2008, 06:32 pm   #6 (permalink) (top)
Gods_Mercenary
Altruism Assassin
 
Gods_Mercenary's Avatar
 
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,948
No, just that if you're not comfortable being ogled, a natural reflex among the male population, you might want to never go out in public. Trust me, I'm not encouraging more clothes.


“Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.”
-Albert Einstein
Gods_Mercenary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 16, 2008, 06:43 pm   #7 (permalink) (top)
SoylentGreen
Hot Lava
 
SoylentGreen's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,292
Quote:
Quote by: Gods_Mercenary View Post
No, just that if you're not comfortable being ogled, a natural reflex among the male population, you might want to never go out in public. Trust me, I'm not encouraging more clothes.
A recent conversation I had with a woman in which she said she always looks at men's crotches, made me wonder just how many women do do that.
The difference I guess is that women are smart enough to be discreet about it.
SoylentGreen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 16, 2008, 11:40 pm   #8 (permalink) (top)
another day
slipping sand
 
another day's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,802
Officer! Officer! That man looked at me!


What a piece of work is man! How noble in reason! The paragon of animals! And yet, to me, what is this quintessence of dust? Man delights not me; no, nor woman neither..
another day is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 17, 2008, 01:10 am   #9 (permalink) (top)
JaneDoe321
Igneous Magma
 
JaneDoe321's Avatar
 
Posts: 316
I think banning ~looking~ at other people is a sign that we should pack up our culture and give it up.
JaneDoe321 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 17, 2008, 03:55 am   #10 (permalink) (top)
Compugasm
Son of X51
 
Compugasm's Avatar
 
Location: San Diego
Posts: 3,639
I'm going to tattoo boobies on my chest.


I'd like to thank Charlie Hodge, bringing me scarves and water.
Compugasm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 17, 2008, 03:13 pm   #11 (permalink) (top)
Milton Bradley
BANNED
 
Location: Ohio Province, Rep. of Comerica
Posts: 7,320
Parhaps it's an appeal for Sharia law, and covering our females like the Muslims.
Milton Bradley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 17, 2008, 03:18 pm   #12 (permalink) (top)
SoylentGreen
Hot Lava
 
SoylentGreen's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,292
Quote:
Quote by: Milton Bradley View Post
Parhaps it's an appeal for Sharia law, and covering our females like the Muslims.
Isn't it weird how in a sex crime the victim is always punished.
Considering it is males that are creating the offensive act then would it not be more consistent to punish the male by making them wear blinders instead.
SoylentGreen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 18, 2008, 04:13 am   #13 (permalink) (top)
Milton Bradley
BANNED
 
Location: Ohio Province, Rep. of Comerica
Posts: 7,320
Quote:
Quote by: SoylentGreen View Post
Isn't it weird how in a sex crime the victim is always punished.
Considering it is males that are creating the offensive act then would it not be more consistent to punish the male by making them wear blinders instead.

I suppose, if you subscribe to that draconian view of punishing the innocent as well as the guilty.
Milton Bradley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 18, 2008, 03:38 pm   #14 (permalink) (top)
SoylentGreen
Hot Lava
 
SoylentGreen's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,292
Quote:
Quote by: Milton Bradley View Post
I suppose, if you subscribe to that draconian view of punishing the innocent as well as the guilty.
Which is a good way of describing Sharia law
SoylentGreen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 19, 2008, 07:24 pm   #15 (permalink) (top)
Tim
Molten Ash
 
Tim's Avatar
 
Posts: 42
Did anybody here read the article? The guy was videotaping another man in a changing room. I think it's pretty reasonable to ban secretly videotaping a bare-chested woman in a room which is specifically designated for changing in private. This article has nothing to do with checking out the rack on some girl with a skimpy shirt, and it certainly has nothing to do with the legality looking at a guy's pecs vs. looking at a girl's jugs when they're clothed and walking around.

EDIT: Actually, I just re-read the article and it does talk a great deal about ogling male vs. female breasts. It's the case itself that has nothing to do with whether or not it's okay to check out girls vs. guys. Now I see where people were coming from. That being said, this case definitely did not make it illegal to ogle girls' breasts.

Last edited by Tim; May 19, 2008 at 08:20 pm.
Tim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 19, 2008, 07:42 pm   #16 (permalink) (top)
Gods_Mercenary
Altruism Assassin
 
Gods_Mercenary's Avatar
 
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,948
It's just as reasonable to ban videotaping men in a private changing room.


“Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.”
-Albert Einstein
Gods_Mercenary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 19, 2008, 08:14 pm   #17 (permalink) (top)
Tim
Molten Ash
 
Tim's Avatar
 
Posts: 42
Quote:
Quote by: Gods_Mercenary View Post
It's just as reasonable to ban videotaping men in a private changing room.
I agree with you there.
Tim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 21, 2008, 10:22 am   #18 (permalink) (top)
Derek Wolff
On a high
 
Derek Wolff's Avatar
 
Posts: 161
I want every woman here that wants to take off her shirt raise her hand.
Derek Wolff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 22, 2008, 03:59 am   #19 (permalink) (top)
Compugasm
Son of X51
 
Compugasm's Avatar
 
Location: San Diego
Posts: 3,639
Quote:
Quote by: Derek Wolff View Post
I want every woman here that wants to take off her shirt raise her hand.
Well, I would've asked them to take their tops off. But if you have some weird hand fetish, start a new thread for that.


I'd like to thank Charlie Hodge, bringing me scarves and water.
Compugasm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 26, 2008, 12:25 pm   #20 (permalink) (top)
oracle13
Molten Ash
 
Posts: 49
no, he's halfway there, he wants them to raise both hands so that the men can take their tops of for them.
oracle13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:09 pm.

Sponsors (become a sponsor)
xango, UK Car Insurance, Beauty Salon, Coach Handbags, Miele Vacuums, Plus Size Bras, Gambling, Bullhorn, Horses for Sale, Ventrilo Server, liquid vitamins, weight loss, Smiley Central, Monetise your website, Ventrilo Server, Dyson Vacuums, Hydroponics & Grow Lights, Offshore banking, beauty salons, Offshore banking, Connecticut Electric Rate, Retail Electric Providers Cirro Energy, LasVegas Vacations, Web Design, homes in hudson, Affordable Web Hosting, Texas Electric Rate Cirro Energy, Security Audit, Guy Factor, Gun Forums, hattrick Bad Credit Mortgages Send Money Online Encyclopaedia Mortgage
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.7.1 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0

© 2003–2008 Volconvo.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9