![]() |
|
| The Debate Forums | Blogs | | | Donate | Register (it's free) | Chatroom | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||||
|
| | Thread Tools |
| | #21 (permalink) (top) |
![]() Fyrdman Location: Middlesbrough UK Posts: 4,152 | How many times do we have to ask, link and summarise!! Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery. Winston Churchill |
| | |
| | #22 (permalink) (top) |
| Molten Ash Posts: 32 | He can't just link--the Economist Print Edition is a published magazine (and a hella expensive one at that). </span><blockquote><span class="smallfont">Quote:</span><hr size="1" />Originally Posted by no, the smaller states get only as many votes as they have representatives in congress... the electorial college is very fair... otherwise you'd have new york/california/texas/florida as the only states that national candidates would visit... they have the majority of the population... the electoral college insures that the national candidates campaign nationally... <hr size="1" /></blockquote><span class='postcolor'> Mathematically the electoral college system is extremely unfair. Read this editorial. It details the fundamental flaw in the system. I know the article is old, but its point rings true today. history doesn't repeat itself, but it rhymes. |
| | |