![]() |
|
| The Debate Forums | Blogs | | | Donate | Register (it's free) | Chatroom | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||||
|
| | Thread Tools |
| | #21 (permalink) (top) | |
| Guest Posts: n/a | Quote:
Regards S. | |
|
| | #23 (permalink) (top) |
![]() MoreThanMeetsTheEye Location: Earth, Solar System Posts: 464 | One that really bugs me is when they say that the 2000 election was given to Bush by the Supreme Court. I would take more issue with the fact that Gore one the popular vote so more people voted for him because I am not even sure about what to think about the electoral college, it would seem to make more sense to have the one with most votes win, but that is not the way it is so Bush technically won the election. |
| | |
| | #25 (permalink) (top) | |
| Guest Posts: n/a | Quote:
Regards S. | |
|
| | #26 (permalink) (top) |
| Molten Ash Location: Hohhot, Inner Mongolia Posts: 134 | I guess this thread would be useful if society could be divided into two and everyone on each side shared the exact same opinion concerning everything. BTW, Deadeye, "Whites" and "Blacks" were also immigrants and I would like the stress 1950's and 1960's. I would also like to refer to today's date, I'm sure you can find a calendar somewhere in your vicinity and figure out how to use it. If we’d put the Pentagon in charge of protecting the ozone layer, they would have stockpiled chlorofluorocarbons as bargaining chips. |
| | |
| | #27 (permalink) (top) |
![]() Slightly Dangerous Location: Greencastle, PA Posts: 1,135 | I think you're getting liberals confused with other groups. You pretty much covered every stereotypical and scapegoat opinion of liberals without adding much substance. The "conservatives are stupid" thread was locked for a reason. 78% of statistics are made up on the spot. |
| | |
| | #28 (permalink) (top) | |
| Molten Ash Location: Hohhot, Inner Mongolia Posts: 134 | Quote:
If we’d put the Pentagon in charge of protecting the ozone layer, they would have stockpiled chlorofluorocarbons as bargaining chips. | |
| | |
| | #30 (permalink) (top) | |||||||||||||||||||
![]() Devil's Advocate Location: Alberta Posts: 136 | Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Segregation Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Jern_Sandyer Jern_Sandyer is the local Devil's Advocate Number 1 I doubt my sanity; yet again I doubt yours as well | |||||||||||||||||||
| | |
| | #31 (permalink) (top) | |
![]() Slightly Dangerous Location: Greencastle, PA Posts: 1,135 | Quote:
Realistically speaking, and looking at trends past and present, the more oil we have the more we'll use. Drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge is just a slippery slope that offers no real solution. For some research and opinions on the matter: Arctic National Wildlife Refuge The following link is pushing a pro-drill agenda. This one's pretty funny, complete with pictures of animals interacting with oil pipelines to prove that there's no effect on wildlife. anwr.org - Arctic National Wildlife Refuge 78% of statistics are made up on the spot. | |
| | |
| | #32 (permalink) (top) | |
| blasphemer Location: Michigan Posts: 7,946 | Quote:
The Vietnam War killed millions of Vietnamese, caused birth defects among their population, destroyed vast sections of land, left landmines all over the place, etc. etc. I know you aren't really capable of acknowledging any of this, but the facts remain. You also immediately suggested that the Vietnam War would have prevented Pol Pot, even though US bombing in Cambodia was heavily responsible for his coming into power to begin with. Grandpa h. Do unto others as you would have them do unto you (unless it costs something). | |
| | |
| | #33 (permalink) (top) | ||||||
| Beloved Truth-Dragon Location: Texas Posts: 1,304 | Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
The American Association of Petroleum Geologists will be glad of the backup. They were getting lonely. Quote:
Gini coefficients for the United States at various times, according to the US Census Bureau: * 1967: 0.397 (first year reported) * 1968: 0.386 (lowest coefficient reported) * 1970: 0.394 * 1980: 0.403 * 1990: 0.428 * 2000: 0.462 * 2005: 0.469 (most recent year reported; highest coefficient reported) So much for the poor becoming rich. We also have the third-highest wealth disparity in the world, right behind our good pals, Russia and Mexico. I look forward to your well-reasoned and well-supported response. K thx bye. If only I could saith, so should I. | ||||||
| | |