![]() |
|
| The Debate Forums | Blogs | | | Donate | Register (it's free) | Chatroom | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||||
|
| | Thread Tools |
| | #41 (permalink) (top) | |||
| Principled Observer Location: Toledo, Ohio Posts: 13,931 | Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Is it not obvious that the more accessible and small the population represented, the more truly "representative" it will be? Is it not obvious that limitation on government, when it is small and locally accessible, more easily prevents corruption, especially widespread corruption? Petition of Redress of Grievances: http://www.givemeliberty.org/default.htm Canadian Lawsuit Against Their National Banks: http://www.freewebs.com/classaction/ Osborn F. Enready | |||
| | |
| | #42 (permalink) (top) |
| Sedimentary Rock Posts: 15 | Lighter Footstep: 5 Reasons Not to Drink Bottled Water | Green Options The environmental costs of bottled water are higher than that of tap water. I think this decision is a good one. It's an unecessary waste and I think the point about the privatization of water is a good one. Putting more resources into individuals buying their water is definitely a step backwards. |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| |