![]() |
|
| The Debate Forums | Blogs | | | Donate | Register (it's free) | Chatroom | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||||
|
| | Thread Tools |
| | #21 (permalink) (top) | |
| formerly Isherwood Location: San Diego, CA Posts: 14,220 | Quote:
The Forum Rules Radical Atheist Heathen Queer Let's agree to respect each others views, no matter how wrong yours may be. (Ashleigh Brilliant) | |
| | |
| | #22 (permalink) (top) | |
| Moral Turnip Location: Oregon, US Posts: 2,283 | Quote:
![]() Honestly, I have always been in favor of allowing students to control their own education, even to the point of allowing them to drop out if they so desire (after passing a minimum proficiency standard, that is) provided that they have opportunities to return if that is their wont. But I think we need to radically alter our vision of school to accomplish this properly, as today's administrators, students, teachers, and parents are generally not prepared to have the entire school turn to independent study. The first thing we need to do is agree on what exactly is the purpose of schooling: if it is to beat students into submission in order to make them more docile and productive workers, then allowing everyone to go at his or her own pace is obviously not the way to go; that sort of thing really snarls up the assembly line. But I don't know. Maybe this would be a better way for me to teach. I'm afraid that right now, with three weeks left in the school year and 80 students who have proven themselves effectively incapable of reading a novel and thinking about its contents, is not the best time for me to be thinking of ideal pedagogy. "Would you like some pie, Dr. Stark?" "Science is my pie. Curiosity, my sweet tooth. Knowledge is my candy." | |
| | |
| | #23 (permalink) (top) |
| Igneous Magma Posts: 365 | No, right now wouldn't be a good time to implement it but a project of that size could take all summer to develop. My science in Junior year actually had it setup so that we could choose our grades. We had to do so many C level assignments to get a C then we could move up and do a certain amount of B level assignments to get a B, etc. Now, I know that the current grading system still allows children to choose their grade, but this forced it to be a conscious effort, instead of just a ton of assignments. For the novel I'd assign the assignments by chapter, and let the kids read through them as quickly as they wished, forming discussion groups for sets of chapters so that you could focus on the group making the slowest progress. Though you'd need a rather large class size for this. |
| | |
| | #24 (permalink) (top) | |||
| Moral Turnip Location: Oregon, US Posts: 2,283 | Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I appreciate the ideas, though. I'll definitely be thinking about ways to implement this. "Would you like some pie, Dr. Stark?" "Science is my pie. Curiosity, my sweet tooth. Knowledge is my candy." | |||
| | |
| | #25 (permalink) (top) | ||||
| Igneous Magma Posts: 365 | Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
| ||||
| | |
| | #26 (permalink) (top) |
| Reasonably insane Posts: 180 | CoffeeSaint even if some students do not activally participate in discussions I believe it would have more postive value then endless facts. I think it would be better to have several extremely intellegent kids rather then a large amount of poorly educated students. One reason why we are so behind Japan and China because we lower the bar to make sure everyone passes while most countrys make an education a privalege if you do not participate then you can just fail. I understand you really can't do anything about it as if you made your class purely critical thinking you must likely would get fired. As my debate teacher was. But still I would encourage you to keep some class discussions in your curiculum. For facts and ideas are useless if you have no way of processing the information. All todays education does is help produce a uniformity work force destined for unskilled labor while China and Japan hold higher positions. I hope you don't feel as I'm am attacking you as you sound like a good teacher dedicated to his work. |
| | |
| | #27 (permalink) (top) |
| Iceberg Location: Connecticut Posts: 5,705 | I don't see any problem with showing this movie to HS students. I believe the more discussion of the movie there is, the more its "truths" and assumptions can shine the light of relevance upon the issue of climate change. The only problem I can anticipate is if teachers penalize students for not being in agreement with their own personal beliefs. Brien the Iceberg If you tell the truth you don't have to remember anything. M.T. |
| | |
| | #29 (permalink) (top) |
| Molten Ash Posts: 55 | Should "An Inconvenient Truth" be shown in classrooms? If I had to make a definite decision on the topic I would say no. It appears to me as Gore is politically grandstanding, he couldn't get the American presidency through the traditional route so he has gone out to show himself as a world loving, caring humanitarian. My local paper proclaimed Al Gore's home uses as much energy in a month as an average U.S. citizen's house uses in a year, if he truly believed in climate change wouldn't he do something to correct this? He's just another lying politician who can't be trusted. |
| | |
| | #30 (permalink) (top) | |
| Igneous Magma Posts: 365 | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #33 (permalink) (top) | |
| Moral Turnip Location: Oregon, US Posts: 2,283 | Quote:
And let's remember that while Gore might be a lying politician, at least his lies didn't sink us in a war and kill thousands of American soldiers. And he did win the Presidency in the traditional way: with the majority of the popular vote leading to the majority of the electoral votes. He lost it in a most untraditional way: we call it "theft." There. Both sides have now been presented.:) "Would you like some pie, Dr. Stark?" "Science is my pie. Curiosity, my sweet tooth. Knowledge is my candy." | |
| | |
| | #34 (permalink) (top) | |
![]() BANNED Location: Ohio Province, Rep. of Comerica Posts: 7,320 | Quote:
No, that is the Republicans job. The Democrats mire us in debt, and unending burauecracy. Aren't there more than two sides to most arguements? As with all "debate" going on in the halls of Congress these days, the debates are always framed as if there are only two sides, and only two sides are ever heard. | |
| | |
| | #35 (permalink) (top) |
| Igneous Magma Posts: 438 | Global Warming is here. There is scientific evidence to back it up. Yet, it's still not believed by some people. There are of course other issues that suffer the same fate. Even if there are 999,999 Scientists that believe Global Warming is real, as long as one scientist is willing to dissent it will give a far greater number of people opportunity to procrastinate. Even if Global Warming isn't real, there will be no harm done making an effort to clean up the environment. -Chris "I guess we are the people our parents warned us about." |
| | |