We discussed the issues surrounding him, reviewed his posts and decided to ban him.

We discussed the issues surrounding him, reviewed his posts and decided to ban him.
So it goes
I realize I haven't been around long, but did it really get that bad?

hey,Quote by: thatoneguy00
Yes, the moderators voted on it, and it was pretty clear after a review that a ban was the right move. We had given him 6 warning points and he still did not try to work with us.
So it goes
Well I do know that he was getting a little under my skin, but I don't see everything so I trust that the right decision was made.

*shrugs* There's no appeal. He's gone. Some previous posters got suspensions, many moons ago, but if anything that made them worse.
I spent a lot of money on booze, birds and fast cars. The rest I just squandered.
-George Best, on being asked what he did with his footballing fortunes.
What does it take to becme a moderator?

good activity, good contributions, conciousness of the rules, etc. I usually contact you if I want you to moderate.
So it goes
I'm sorry to see him go but I guess if you guys gave him 6 warnings ... well what can you say.
I adimt I didn't follow a lot of the threads he tended to pursue most though so I didn't really see what happened.
Freedom - are you man enough to handle it? If so, join us in New Hampshire!
The Free State Project ("Liberty in our lifetime!")
www.freestateproject.com

Well he didn't really contribute to any discussion. You just had to see the thread title and the name "zealot" to know what he was going to say. And that's fine, if he had a good way of explaining why he thought the way he did. He never did. He just "was right" "ofcourse". Actually I still suspect him of pretending. I mean, I could create a new account and post the way he did. It's very easy really... He didn't have enough "meat" to actually back up the claims he made, which was what makes me suspicious.

I have to say a final touche' to the Zealot.
I don't think he made me think once, but he made me laugh many times......
Overall I would have to agree with the decision, based on the same thing. He was an antagonist, and rarely if ever had anything constructive in the area of "debate".
I will say though, he did have honesty in his screen name!
Petition of Redress of Grievances:
http://www.givemeliberty.org/default.htm
Canadian Lawsuit Against Their National Banks:
http://www.freewebs.com/classaction/
Osborn F. Enready
* doing my best Mrs Alito crocodile tears*

Actually he had 7 points, but got one removed for good behavior.
Science flies you to the moon. Religion flies you into buildings.
Bookmarks