User Tag List

Page 1 of 16 1234511 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 12 of 190

Thread: There is no God

  1. #1
    Lullaby Chainer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    3,020
    Threads
    206
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    There is no God

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The title says it all. I realize there may be other threads of this nature but if the administrators don't mind, I'd like to create my own so that I can better involve myself in this community. It is intimidating to post in a thread that has already developed into many many pages for you never know if you're repeating something already extensively covered unless you read the entire thing.

    First off, I am an Atheist and a hardcore one at that. I despise religion with a passion but I can respect any argument you wish to impose. I will address absolutely all religious comments even if all I have to say is, "That's a good point. I can't argue with that."

    I'll start off by providing the bases of why I choose Atheism over religion. Note that I focus on Christianity. This is only to save time and I assume most, but not all, of the religious viewers of this thread will be Christians

    Consider this.. when you were born, you had know idea of who or what the godly figure of your religion is. You are told this by your environment. In other words, you family, friends, church, or neighbor are the key source in determining the religion of most people. It is nearly un-head of that a young child would deny the teachings of its environment until they are old enough to consider their options for themselves. I was a Christian until the age of thirteen. With this in mind, we can assume that one of the biggest factors in determining the religion of an individual unless they reconsider their options later on. MOST people stick with what they've been taught and if this applies to you, let me ask you this... How is it that you are so confident in your religion when the only reason you are of affiliated with your particular religion because of the environment you were born into? If you were born in China wouldn't it be likely that you would be a Buddhist? And wouldn't you be just as sure your religion (if Buddhism can be considered a religion) is the truest religion out there? If you "A" were born into a Christian family and was taught Christian beliefs and than at the same time, the same you or you "B" was born in China and was taught Buddhist beliefs and than both you "A" and you "B" were put in a room, would you both not be completely convinced that your religion was the correct one and the other wasn't correct as you? Do you really think your faith is greater than the faith of another individual? I'd have to say it would be naive to think so.

    At this part.. many Christians defend themselves by telling me those other people of other religions don't always go to Hell because they don't know any better. But honestly, that's not the point. We're questioning if you religion is true, not if its ok for those other people to be doing what they're doing.

    So, to have faith in your religion you must not only have faith in the existence of a god, but that you somehow landed yourself into the correct religion out of so many. The most common factor in religions is faith. Faith seems like a big chance to rely on if there is so many different faiths, all equal in degree, but all very different too. Many Christians would than tell me that they have more than faith. They see miracles happening every day and many of the things in the bible have come true. But the flaw in that is simple. You are stilling relying on faith that your religion is the cause of what could possibly be many other things... like science or natural cause and effect. Don't people die just as miraculously? Do you deny that things might just happen because it in nature to happen? That's still relying on faith. But than, one might tell me they have felt the presence of God. Just as many theists have personal evidence that the being they worship exists, so many atheists have personal evidence that such beings do not exist. That evidence varies from person to person. Furthermore, without wishing to dismiss your evidence out of hand, many people have claimed all kinds of unlikely things -- that they have been abducted by UFOs, visited by the ghost of Elvis, and so on.

    Before I continue, nearly every time I start to debate what is below, Christians ask me why I can talk about God if I don't believe he exists. The thing is, people talk about things all the time even though they know it doesn't exist. Santa Claus for example does not exist but we know a lot about him. We even know what he looks like and what he wears and even the name of his reindeer. But when someone talks about, elves for example, that doesn't mean they believe in them or that elves exists. It is pure purposeful to refer to something you don't actually think exists especially when you're debating why it doesn't exist. If I wanted to prove to a child that Santa Claus doesn't exist (and I wouldn't ) it would be unfair to disable me by tell me that I can't talk about how Santa couldn't possibly visit every child in the world on Christmas because I don't believe. So, just try to keep that in mind.

    Early mankind guessed wrongly about so much in the world that it is ridiculous to think that they guessed correctly about the origin of mankind. Christianity for example has many flaws and implies that its creator was no god at all but a creation of mankind’s ignorance in explaining the world around them.

    According to popular belief, God is said to be an omniscient, omnipotent, perfect being. Anything less would not be defined as the Christian God we know. But it is also a claim that God gave us free will and the ability to make choices. Now, I won't get into scientific evidence against free will for that may just veer this discussion in the wrong direction. But there is a fundamental flaw in this logic. A omniscient God knows all that is going to happen which means.. it will happen. In other words, what is going to happen.. will happen, and God just so happens to know what will happen. Before God created the world we live on, he knew precisely how things would play out. He knew that creating the fruit in the Garden of Eden would be eaten by Adam and Eve. He knew that Adam and Eve would eat this fruit before he even made them and that man-kind would be cursed. He also knew that by creating Lucifer, the angel would rebel and eventually bring about Hell. He also knew, even before he started creating everything, that millions and millions, if not billions, of people would be cast into Hell to suffer forever. The most common response to this is that God gave us free will and the choice to make our own decisions. But God created us.. and he created us just the way we are, after all, he is a God. He knew that by creating us the way he did, we would ultimately be sent to Heaven or Hell. He knew, even before creating us, that by creating us with certain flaws and in a certain way, which is the exact way we all are, we will make certain choices and he knew that by creating each of us in the way he did, we would already be destined to spend eternity in Heaven or Hell. Not only did he allow for the creation of Hell, he knew it would be created and this perfect, omnipotent, omniscient God allowed it knowing that many many people would have to suffer for the rest of eternity in Hell if they don't pass regulations. God created the test (our lives) the passing grade (Heaven or Hell) the participants (us), and the IQ of the test taker (he creates each and every one of us in a certain way already knowing that by creating us that certain way we would be sent to Heaven or Hell, or.. pass or fail the test.)

    Some Christians would than tell me that we would just be robots without the ability to commit a sin. Than wtf is Heaven? Can we commit sins in Heaven, if not, according to those Christians, we would be nothing but robots in Heaven. So why does this perfect benevolent being let things like Hell and sin exist if everyone could just be in Heaven? He wanted us to worship him? And to choose to do so without clearly letting us know, hence faith? Not only that but, he already knows that by the way he creates us he knows precisely the consequences of the flaws he puts in us and knows before creating us that we will pass regulations or not. Are you Christians just the lucky ones that God decided to create a certain way that would consequentially lead you to Heaven and its just too bad that I was created in a way that God knew would send me to Hell forever? How in the world does a finite sin that God not only allows, but creates the sinner in the exact way they are, deserve a infinite punishment? Do you realize how long infinity is? It can't even be defined by time. How can a perfect being allow all of this?

    Debate!


  2. #2
    Assad ul-Jihaad Abdullah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    On the Battlefield
    Posts
    213
    Threads
    13
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Seems to me that you don`t believe in God because of your lifes experiences with the Christian Faith and since what all of what you`ve said refers to Christianity I can`t answer any of those Q`s.

    Last edited by Abdullah; 5th January 2006 at 07:25 PM.

  3. #3
    Lullaby Chainer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    3,020
    Threads
    206
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I am an atheist if that is what you mean by don't believe in God. I don't just not believe in the god with a capital 'G' but all religions. Now, when I chose to become an Atheist, it wasn't because anyone told me to, if anything people were telling me how wrong Atheism was, it was because I thought it through with reason and logic. I do admit that my life experiences have contributed to my Atheism, for what are we but the life we've experienced? But with that said, the factors contributing to my Atheism are more universal than personal experiences. Logic is a concept understood around the world and doesn't pertain to the experiences of just one individual while many, but not all, religious people typically are so by the word of their environment or life experiences, especially if they feel they've been saved by a divine being which is most definitely not a universal concept but a personal one.

    I’ve very sorry if you are unable to reply because I’ve focused my attentions to Christianity, but I hope you will accept the reasons I stated above.


  4. #4
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    5,021
    Threads
    33
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I don't like organized religion and their view on what God is or how he's supposed to be. I reject that.


    But I fully accept the possibility that something may have created the universe.


  5. #5
    9/11: Inside Job PatrickHenry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Hawai'i, Big Island
    Posts
    10,469
    Threads
    457
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Quote by: Lullaby Chainer
    Are you Christians just the lucky ones that God decided to create a certain way that would consequentially lead you to Heaven and its just too bad that I was created in a way that God knew would send me to Hell forever?
    Is every rough gemstone good enough to be shaped for the finest necklace? Should God wear a necklace made of gravel?

    "Arms in the hands of the citizens may be used at individual discretion for the defense of the country, the overthrow of tyranny or private self-defense." -- John Adams

  6. #6
    Creator lili462's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    213
    Threads
    7
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Quote by: tman_ndsu08
    I don't like organized religion and their view on what God is or how he's supposed to be. I reject that.


    But I fully accept the possibility that something may have created the universe.
    i second that


  7. #7
    Ready to Rok Jimmy the Pro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Oklahoma
    Posts
    1,932
    Threads
    74
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Mr. Hardcore Atheist, the one who starts this thread.

    You believed in God because society and outside factors around you told you to. When you became "old enough" you learned to make choices for youself. Therefore, you decided to go against God at that point because He was just a figment of what people told you.

    Am I correct to assume these facts???

    "I believe Christianity as I believe the sun has risen: not only because I see it, but because by it, I see everything else."
    -C.S. Lewis-

  8. #8
    Lullaby Chainer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    3,020
    Threads
    206
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Not at all correct mister. Please read my posts if you haven't. I have already very elaboratley explained myself.

    I don't like organized religion and their view on what God is or how he's supposed to be. I reject that.


    But I fully accept the possibility that something may have created the universe.
    I can respect that. I think that is more likely than the Christian, or any other religous god, although, I believe the universe is eternal. Mainly because you evenutally get to the put of who created the creator and so forth which a lot of the times brings you to the creator just "is" and always "was". But than, with that logic, couldn't the universe be in the same situation? That it just "is" and just "was"? I think that's possible.


  9. #9
    Libertarian Keith Hamburger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Colorado Springs, CO
    Posts
    1,609
    Threads
    28
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Quote by: Lullaby Chainer
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Debate!
    Wow, I came to the exact conclusions using the same arguments at the age of 16, and I've never looked back.

    The other aspect of "omniscience" has to do with preordination. If an event is pre-ordained to happen then there can absolutely be no free will in regard to that event. It took reading the tale of Oedipus in high school to reach that conclusion. Even if the ordination is not revealed to us but is only known to God, we have no free will, what will happen has happened and cannot not happen.

    You are absolutely correct, although I personally prefer the term agnostic as I don't close my mind to any possibility. It could very well be possible that the Christians are wrong but there is some form of superior being. I would expect objective proof to convince me, however.

    Keith


  10. #10
    READ...MY...HANDS!!! dthmstr254's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Chatanooga TN at tennessee temple university
    Posts
    3,092
    Threads
    51
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have a question. your theory leaves out a huge group of Christians. why in some cases are hardcore atheists, who used to say the same things you have said in this post, one day convert to Christianity. one hardcore atheist went on a trip to Iraq in the years that we were at peace with them, and came back a Christian, claiming to have "met God." one very good and publicized example of an atheist turned Christian would be Lee Strobell, who as a Yale student of Law, was known as a critically thinking man, considering every piece of evidence that came his way. he earned awards for anti-Christian articles that made front-page news, including his first he wrote during his amateur news person days, writing an article titled "Dun-clad Preachers Versus White-robed Scientists." he married and had kids, then one day his wife went to church with a friend, came back with news he thought insane, his wife was saved. they spent months arguing about it, coming very close to divorcing. the only thing that kept them from doing so was the fact that they had gone in for a covenant marriage, which by law requires that the couple go to marriage counseling and wait four months before they can divorce. anyways, he set up times that he could interview the best in their field, composing his interviews into three books: The Case for Christ, The Case for Faith, and the Case for a Creator. in the Case for Christ, he interviewed people for the historical facts surrounding Christ, including the eywitness testimony, how well that testimony was preserved, a psychological profile of Jesus and much more, showing him that 1.) Jesus's biographies remained untainted through history, and untouched by mythology; 2.) Jesus did indeed live; 3.) Jesus fit the Old Testament profile of the Messiah, and 4.) evidence from Tacitus and Josephus can corroborate that Jesus's ressurection and subsequent appearances were well enough documented through hundreds of eyewitnesses. in the last point, one person would be considered hearsay, but when you have hundreds, you can eliminate the hearsay rule.
    in Case for Faith, Lee discovers why faith is better at times than proof, and in Case for a creator, he discovers the cosmological, consciousness, biochemistry, and biological evidence towards a Creator. anyways, when he finished compiling all this information, from experts that have many awards in their fields, he turned to Christ. your theory leaves people like him out of the picture, basically implying that they don't exist. how are they converted?

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    HOUSE: There's a bullet in his head.

    CAMERON: He was shot?

    HOUSE: No … somebody threw it at him.

  11. #11
    Lullaby Chainer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    3,020
    Threads
    206
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have a question. your theory leaves out a huge group of Christians. why in some cases are hardcore atheists, who used to say the same things you have said in this post, one day convert to Christianity. one hardcore atheist went on a trip to Iraq in the years that we were at peace with them, and came back a Christian, claiming to have "met God."
    There are great minds on both sides of the fence. Both Albert Einstein and Stevin Hawkings don't believe in a personal god.

    This is also anecdotal evidence. For an example..

    "There's abundant proof that God exists and is still performing miracles today. Just last week I read about a girl who was dying of cancer. Her whole family went to church and prayed for her, and she was cured."
    It's quite valid to use personal experience to illustrate a point; but such anecdotes don't actually prove anything to anyone. Your friend may say he met Elvis in the supermarket, but those who haven't had the same experience will require more than your friend's anecdotal evidence to convince them.

    Anecdotal evidence can seem very compelling, especially if the audience wants to believe it.

    in the Case for Christ, he interviewed people for the historical facts surrounding Christ, including the eywitness testimony, how well that testimony was preserved, a psychological profile of Jesus and much more, showing him that 1.) Jesus's biographies remained untainted through history, and untouched by mythology; 2.) Jesus did indeed live; 3.) Jesus fit the Old Testament profile of the Messiah, and 4.) evidence from Tacitus and Josephus can corroborate that Jesus's ressurection and subsequent appearances were well enough documented through hundreds of eyewitnesses. in the last point, one person would be considered hearsay, but when you have hundreds, you can eliminate the hearsay rule.
    Frankly, you're just pulling things out of the air here. Please feel free to link or I'm just relying on your word. I know of much evidence that says he doesn't exist

    Most atheists feel that the Bible is of questionable accuracy, as it was written thousands of years ago by many authors who were recording oral tradition that existed many years before. Thus, any claimed 'truth' in it is of questionable legitimacy. This isn't to say that The Bible has no truth in it; simply that any truth must be examined before being accepted.

    Many atheists also feel that because any passage is subject to "interpretation", any claim that a passage 'means' one thing and one thing only is not legitimate.

    Note that this feeling tends to extend to other books.

    That statement reminds me of the saying.
    .
    "Did Jesus exist? If not, then there's not much to talk about. If he did, he called himself Lord. This means that either:

    He was Lord,
    He was a liar, or
    He was a lunatic.
    It's unlikely he was a liar, given his morals as described in the Bible, and his behavior doesn't sound like that of a lunatic. So surely we must conclude that he was Lord?"

    Firstly, note that this argument hinges on the assumption that Jesus did in fact exist. This is at least debatable.

    Secondly, the argument attempts a logical fallacy which we might call "trifurcation", by analogy with "bifurcation". That is, the argument attempts to restrict us to three possibilities, when in fact there are many more.

    Two of the more likely alternatives are:

    He was misquoted in the Bible, and did not claim to be Lord.
    The stories about him were made up, or embroidered with fictitious material by the early Christians.
    Note that in the New Testament Jesus does not say that he is God, although John 10:30 claims that he said "I and my father are one". The claim that Jesus was God was first made after the death of Jesus and his twelve disciples.

    Finally, note that the possibility that he was a "lunatic" is not easily discountable. Even today in the western world there are numerous people who have managed to convince hundreds or thousands of followers that they are the Lord or his One True Prophet. People like L. Ron Hubbard, Sun Myung Moon, Jim Jones and David Koresh continue to peddle their divinity. In more superstitious countries, there are literally hundreds of present-day messiahs.

    Incidentally, the "Lord, Liar or Lunatic" argument is based on arguments in the book "Mere Christianity" by C.S. Lewis, the well known author and committed Christian. He wrote many books containing Christian apologia, and also a number of fantasy and SF novels influenced by Christian themes. His most famous books, the Narnia series of novels, are a fantasy retelling of many aspects of Christian faith, with Aslan taking the place of Jesus. Amusingly, some Christian fundamentalists in the USA have attempted to have Lewis's books banned from schools, alleging that they are "Satanic" in influence.

    how are they converted?
    That statement is about as pointless as asking why a devout Christian is converted to the Islamic faith or Atheism. People change their minds about stuff all the time. But isn't that an obvious thing?


  12. #12
    READ...MY...HANDS!!! dthmstr254's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Chatanooga TN at tennessee temple university
    Posts
    3,092
    Threads
    51
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Quote by: Lullaby Chainer
    There are great minds on both sides of the fence. Both Albert Einstein and Stevin Hawkings don't believe in a personal god.

    This is also anecdotal evidence. For an example..

    "There's abundant proof that God exists and is still performing miracles today. Just last week I read about a girl who was dying of cancer. Her whole family went to church and prayed for her, and she was cured."
    It's quite valid to use personal experience to illustrate a point; but such anecdotes don't actually prove anything to anyone. Your friend may say he met Elvis in the supermarket, but those who haven't had the same experience will require more than your friend's anecdotal evidence to convince them.

    Anecdotal evidence can seem very compelling, especially if the audience wants to believe it.
    the thing is, this isn't personal experience, this is another man's testimony. and he was as devout an atheist as they come.



    Frankly, you're just pulling things out of the air here. Please feel free to link or I'm just relying on your word. I know of much evidence that says he doesn't exist
    I will come back to the rest of the points later. I want to see your evidence that Jesus didn't exist, because, as I have said in other threads, and quoted in them too, history books still state that Jesus lived, even going so far as to say he had the "ability to cure sicknesses." let us go into a logical debate on this one, and add in your evidence that the New Testament is questionable. I have access to archaeological evidence that can prove much of the information in the Bible, including people and places existence and location. take it a point at a time, cause I don't want to waste time reading huge posts, and your other opponents won't either. big introductory posts are fine, but try to trim it down to a five minute read. thanks.

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    HOUSE: There's a bullet in his head.

    CAMERON: He was shot?

    HOUSE: No … somebody threw it at him.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •