User Tag List

Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 23456
Results 61 to 63 of 63

Thread: The New World Order: Bush, Clinton, and the Pentagon

  1. #61
    moderat-e/o-r bishop's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    boston
    Posts
    11,179
    Threads
    594
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Not a theory, as you can see. I didn't say that was "how the world works", merely quoting GB to demostrate his stated goal to form a "New World Order".
    *sigh*

    your "example" cites a goal based on an idea - an idea which is based on the theory that collectivism can make the world a safer place. if you take away that theory, then you consequentially take away the goal. conspiracy theorists such as yourself, disagree with the theory of collectivism - instead you keep the goal the same, but change the theoretical foundation so that you can paint the "nwo" in a bad light.

    the goal that bush sr. mentioned has a whopping TWO lonely accomplishments in the u.n.'s 50+ years of existance. reality paints a much different picture than political rhetoric. fears about the nwo are much ado about nothing. the nation state remains the primary actor in international affairs, and events in the recent past show that it will continue to do so for the foreseeable future.


    What, I almost agree with you?? Say it isn't so!!
    well, i'm a centrist, and used to be a registered republican - so it's not surprising to me.. i just think that bush suffers from king midas syndrome (except things he touches definitely don't turn into gold), and would throw a party if he were to suddenly die.


  2. #62
    BANNED (Multiple usernames after another ban)
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    1,337
    Threads
    8
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm no "theorist", but I do find it funny that Bush Sr. can make comments like this and get away with it. Bush is about as conservative as Clinton's penis. Here he is, calling for global government and an alliance with the most criminal government in modern history and all you get are a few shrugs from the conservatives and an apology and/or justification from the liberals.

    Last edited by Lou Minotti; 3rd January 2005 at 06:31 PM.

  3. #63
    moderat-e/o-r bishop's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    boston
    Posts
    11,179
    Threads
    594
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Here he is, calling for global government and an alliance with the most criminal government in modern history and all you get are a few shrugs from the conservatives and an apology and/or justification from the liberals.
    actually, my response was a bit more detailed than a few shrugs and/or an apology.. maybe you should actually address the points i made?

    so bush's father answered all of your fears by saying those three, evil words.. talk about being simplistic - you take the cake! since we're debating on the level of catchy phrases, here's another - talk is cheap. or, actions speak louder than words - the u.n. has authorized TWO wars in its 50+ years of existance.


Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •