Stop Women From Voting

[Libhater]

So you have conveniently defined "terrorist" to be a Muslim extremist. It's no wonder that you say all terrorists have been Muslim; you've defined it that way. It's pointless to even say "all terrorists are Muslim" when you define the word "terrorist" as "Muslim extremist" as that becomes nothing more than a tautology.

However, the rest of the world doesn't recognize your definition of terrorist. "Terrorist" has a much broader definition than the one you subscribe to (I would suggest you look it up in the dictionary) and you'll find that terrorism has been around far longer than jihadism.

Incidentally, your definition for "liberal" is also quite wrong; I'd suggest you look that one up too. It sounds like you don't own a dictionary; it might be a good investment to make, especially if you're planning to get into debates involving the meaning of words, but don't forget that there are also online dictionaries of decent quality so you might want to use those if you don't have enough money to buy a dictionary.

**** The purpose of this forum is to delve into current political matters (at least it is for me). So when you see me speak of terrorism and liberalism....I do so by keeping them in their proper context by using today's lexion of the 21st century. I may occasionally slip on back to mention our founding fathers so as to keep people abreast of such notables as our Constitution and the fact that all of our founders were White skinned when forming our Republic. So if you see any discrepancies whatsover in my current use of the words liberal and terrorist as they apply to today's climate, I would certainly appreciate any and all heads-ups.

[notthecheatr]

**** The purpose of this forum is to delve into current political matters (at least it is for me). So when you see me speak of terrorism and liberalism....I do so by keeping them in their proper context by using today's lexion of the 21st century.

Terrorism and liberal politics predate the 21st century by a long time period. The connotations may have changed over time, but the meaning of the words changes very little if at all.

I may occasionally slip on back to mention our founding fathers so as to keep people abreast of such notables as our Constitution and the fact that all of our founders were White skinned when forming our Republic.

How is the skin color of the founding fathers relevant to any debate? They were all strong progressives, although limited by the fact that slavery and white supremicism was the norm of the day.

So if you see any discrepancies whatsover in my current use of the words liberal and terrorist as they apply to today's climate, I would certainly appreciate any and all heads-ups.

I see a remarkable lack of historical perspective, but no, as far as "today's climate" goes your definitions seem pretty pedestrian - at least where American conservatives (i.e. the majority of Americans) are concerned.

[RickSp]

How is the skin color of the founding fathers relevant to any debate? They were all strong progressives, although limited by the fact that slavery and white supremicism was the norm of the day..

Libby here seems to prefer the original Constitution where women lacked the right to vote and most black people were slaves.

[Libhater]

Libby here seems to prefer the original Constitution where women lacked the right to vote and most black people were slaves.

*** Can't argue with your logic here. This must be a first where a lib actually cites American history just as it was, without relying on a revisionist version thereof. And yes, America came into being without the help or hindrance of blacks and women...thank you very much.

[RickSp]

*** Can't argue with your logic here. This must be a first where a lib actually cites American history just as it was, without relying on a revisionist version thereof. And yes, America came into being without the help or hindrance of blacks and women...thank you very much.

So you admit that you prefer the original Constitution where women lacked the right to vote and most black people were slaves.

Not only a racist and a misogynist but two hundred and twenty years behind the times as well. Thank you for that clarification.

[Libhater]

[QUOTE=RickSp;723446]

So you admit that you prefer the original Constitution where women lacked the right to vote and most black people were slaves.

*** Now you're catching on, sonny. The integration of blacks into modern society has caused many problems....the least of which has been racial unrest. Women's Suffrage has given us a bloated government that has created all these entitlement programs that are bankrupting our nation. Wouldn't it be nice to go back to the time when our Constitutionmeant something and all of America's citizens got along and were unified in a single mission to eliminate British rule?

[RickSp]

[QUOTE=Libhater;723487]

So you admit that you prefer the original Constitution where women lacked the right to vote and most black people were slaves.

*** Now you're catching on, sonny. The integration of blacks into modern society has caused many problems....the least of which has been racial unrest. Women's Suffrage has given us a bloated government that has created all these entitlement programs that are bankrupting our nation. Wouldn't it be nice to go back to the time when our Constitutionmeant something and all of America's citizens got along and were unified in a single mission to eliminate British rule?

So you want to re-institute slavery and put women ? That says it all.

Pathetic little Libby. Scared little cracker afraid of women and black people.

[Libhater]

[QUOTE=RickSp;723492]

So you want to re-institute slavery and put women ? That says it all.

Pathetic little Libby. Scared little cracker afraid of women and black people.

*** Look, this isn't about my fear or lack of fear from blacks or women...its about what these blacks and women have done to destroy America.

[Maryjane]

*** Look, this isn't about my fear or lack of fear from blacks or women...its about what these blacks and women have done to destroy America.

Do you read your links? Heh...it was quite amusing to read Homeschool Dad blogged later that he didn't actually believe that women shouldn't vote. Do your own homework and find it for yourself. Also amusing was the comment section. This post in particular...more tongue in cheek humor...this time for the ladies.

SCUM Manifesto - Valerie Solanas

[Winter wind]

*** Look, this isn't about my fear or lack of fear from blacks or women...its about what these blacks and women have done to destroy America

You folks are a rare breed these days. It's almost a shame.

I'm guessing you're the kind of person who likes Ann Coulter right? You believe she should get a vote, but not another woman? Do you have a litmus test in mind for deciding which women should vote?

As for black people (This is going to be fun):

Now you're catching on, sonny. The integration of blacks into modern society has caused many problems...the least of which has been racial unrest

No matter what you do (aside from sending them all to the moon), African-Americans will be integrated into modern society. If they kept to themselves, we would still be interacting with them if only to compete for jobs. If, when this happens, do you think ignorance born out of separation will make the inevitable clash easier? Segregate the two groups and you likely have civil war eventually.

Not to mention the fact it's wrong to not interact with someone based on the color of their skin, if only because it's never a clear judgment of their personality.

Also, what has really caused you to not like women or black people. Is it because the vote republican or is it something to do with people you know?

PS I love the user name.

PPS I'm back.

[Libhater]

[QUOTE=Winter wind;723549]

You folks are a rare breed these days. It's almost a shame.

[quote] Yeah, I hear you. Not, it's almost a shame, rather, it is a shame all people don't have the patriotic leanings of yours truly.

I'm guessing you're the kind of person who likes Ann Coulter right? You believe she should get a vote, but not another woman? Do you have a litmus test in mind for deciding which women should vote?

[quote] Evidently you missed some of my posts where in one (probably the stop women from voting) I had but a caveat in there suggesting that it was just liberal women we should stop since Repuiblican/Conservative women won't vote financialy unsustainable social/entitlement programs. And yes, Ann Coulter is perhaps the most politically intelligent woman on the face of the earth. A test to weed out the nation wreckers would be a simple lib/Conservative test with basic questions like do you favor our Constitution or the Marxist Doctrine?

As for black people (This is going to be fun):

[quote] It hasn't been as fun for me having lived through the black/White racial unrest during the 1973-4 Boston bussing debacle when a liberal judge Garrity ordered the desegration of our schools.



No matter what you do (aside from sending them all to the moon), African-Americans will be integrated into modern society. If they kept to themselves, we would still be interacting with them if only to compete for jobs. If, when this happens, do you think ignorance born out of separation will make the inevitable clash easier? Segregate the two groups and you likely have civil war eventually.

[quote] How is it ignorant to separate groups of people? I've said it before, but to=do you call it ignorance to see and have blackls segregate into mostly black enclaves like in Roxbury, Harlem and Watts? My guess is that it would be more probable for a civil war to erupt once and when differing races clash as during an ordinary day in any of our multi racial urban districts.

Not to mention the fact it's wrong to not interact with someone based on the color of their skin, if only because it's never a clear judgment of their personality.

[quote] So now its wrong to not integrate because a person may have a phobia of skin coloring? Wow, that one is a stretch to say the least. Perhaps you're right, I may choose to segregate myself from possible harm and from posssible racial unrest just because I have some kind of personality disorder that prevents me from engaging in civil unrest.

Also, what has really caused you to not like women or black people. Is it because the vote republican or is it something to do with people you know?

[quote] I never said I don't like black people or women. Refer back to what I said about ASnn Coulter, and know this, I wpould vote for any black man running for president if he were to uphold the Conservative message.

PS I love the user name.

[quote] Look, if you love the name that much, then I suggest you change yours to Libhater2, though I do use that particular one on other forums.

[NoJingoLingo]

1. Please define what "entitlement programs" are.
2. Please substantiate the claim that female votes lead to more entitlement programs.
3. Please explain in a completely objective way why "entitlement programs" as defined in (1) are in fact a bad thing.


1. Please define what you mean by "debt-ridden society" considering that some debt is necessary for any credit-based economy to function at all. At what point does a society become "debt-ridden" as opposed to just a normal credit-based economy?
2. Please substantiate the claim that female votes cause society to be debt-ridden. Did you never notice that the vast majority of the people who are governing this "debt-ridden" society are, in fact, male?


1. Please define what you mean by a "strong military," vis-a-vis the military our country currently operates (which is universally considered to be the strongest military in the world), as opposed to a "weak military."
2. Please substantiate the claim that female votes cause military weakness.
3. Please explain in a completely objective way why a "strong military" as defined in (1) is, in fact, a good thing.


1. Please explain for those of us who are uneducated fascist liberals who this "Hillary Harridan" person is and why no Google search I make for this name turns up any real names of any actual politicians.
2. Please explain in a completely objective way why this contrived female politician "Hillary Harridan" would be a bad choice for president of the United States of America.
3. Please explain in a completely objective way why any female president would be a bad thing, in light of the track record of our past presidents (all of whom have been male) and without making any chauvinistic generalizations but sticking solely to the facts.

Thank you.

Seriously, did you expect a thoughtful response?