Job creation

[Charlatan]

To create more jobs, there should be some incentive to government. I am sure if there was something that government got out of it, they would go for it!

To get the state involved, we need to set up a global fund from the people for the state. This fund could take a nomainal fee from all working people, for just one month, and set up businesses from that money, or, send it to the country that supplied the most jobs in that time?

But, if the people were taxed more, say, one percent more, then how would that affect, say, my country south africa?

Let's say the average income in south africa is two thousand rand a month. That by about twenty million people. That comes to, at one percent, meaning 800,000,000 would be raised by this sector alone by raising the taxation by one percent! What could this do for the country, even if it is a once off tax? Well, it costs about a million rand to build a factory, and lets say another square million for the land and machines. That means two million could subsidise the construction of 300,000,000 factories or business blocks in the country. This will lead to, at about ten percent say about, 300,000,000 factories all supplying jobs of two thousand rand a month, at fifty people a factory or business block, more than 40,000,000,000 or fourty billion rands gdp growth or whatever - more coming in a month for the state. So, there is something in it for the fat cats too.

Of course, job creation is not part of the priorities of the elite. This is why they should set up a body for one month, let's say in two months time, to create one billion jobs. We do not have one billion people, so, we should plan for half a percent, coming to five hundred million people, but that is still way too much! Let's say we charge a quarter a percent on this new tax, creating two hundred million jobs? Well, we only have fifty million people, and half of them have jobs, so we need thirty million jobs. This means that we can charge only a tenth of a percent of the total income, and come away with more than enough factories to sell or whatever, and they will sell! Then there is the chore of selling the factories and business blocks, making, say, double your money back, meaning the fund could make the state, for setting it up, billions of rands.

Then there is the total cost for employing thirty million people, coming to roughly, say, 90,000,000 rand, or ninety million rand. They could afford that in their sleep! Why is nothing being done, and why not set up a fund for this one month? They will make money, they will create jobs, and they will make inital capital gains aswell.

To set up the fund, they need one account, and a once off tax for all citizens of a tenth of a percent. Then they need to redirect that to build infrastructure, sell it, and viola, problem solved.

[Charlatan]

Maybe I have been too ambitious? What if we were not to upset anyone, and instead look for a more traditional way to do things?

If the jobs that are out there make capital, those people can lend money. Instead of paying off a home loan, they could take out money to start thier own business and be thier own boss. This will make it more attractive to the current employee, and then there will be more jobs and a greater gdp. They could even from bigger businesses by banding together to compete with the establishment.

If the state was to back this idea up, there would be great yields i am sure. New legislation in banks around the world would see this become a reality, making it attractive indeed for the person to start thier business.

[Charlatan]

Further employment oppurtunities should be made by those looking for the jobs ideally, as nobody then can tell you no. What is it you are trying to sell? How can you cut costs? What do others do to cut costs? How can you make money without cutting into your profit too much?

The best way to make money is to provide a service. Now where are people unserviced? There must be another avanue for making money...

How about we first look to where the money is? The money is with the one percent! The best way to get money, therefore, is to service the one percent, but, all the one percent's money is tied up in banks or stocks. This means they could, if everything was fair, make thier own reviews of the markets. They don't need to be experts in the field even, all they need to do is report on how many pockets of potatoes the supermerket sells, for example. Recording where money is spent and making that information available to the one percent is a sure fire way to get employed. I know that the one percent would love to have many magazines and papers on how and where money is being spent. Then there is the oppurtunity for advertising as well!

So, the best thing many unemployed could do would be to start a fianance and expenditure magazine. Think of how many houe wives read those magazines - now think of the lob sidedness of the market for men and what they enjoy.

That s the key, to find where the markets are lobsided between sexes. Magazines is just one point. Then think where women are short changed? Where would that be? I would say that would be where they are treated as housewives. Think of all the working women out there, why not start a gq for women? There are countless examples where it is still an untapped market, and needing people to report from every city in the country, would this make a few more one percenters? No! The little guys will buy shares in these ventures as the one percent is not into trying new things, and then the little guys will be able to ride this wave of entertainment!

[Charlatan]

A way to create more jobs would be to increase needs and needs of service, and the best way to do that is with more money. If the state were to throw money at entrpreneurs, where they get money added to thier capital, it would employ more people, make a bigger gdp, cause a little inflation, and just about do it for the world.

If the country of any nation was to hand out money for businesses at banks, where the person has credibility and seems capable of running a business, needs will increase, services will increase and jobs will be widespread.

Now, if the state, let's say america, has an unemployment rate of 10%, then they could easily take money from welfare - there is a lot of that i suppose - and channel it into job creation. The best way to create jobs is to lend from the bank, with a credible business scheme for the future, and then those people on welfare can get a job.

It costs the state like, let's say, at least five hundred dollars to take care of each person, and we will allow for a lot of lee way with this figure. 10% of 300 000 000 is 30 million. Thirty million times by five hundred dollars a month = 1 500 000 000. so, it costs the state about - let's allow for lee way here again - two billion dollars a month to cater for the unemployed.

USA Statistics in Brief--Government, Social Welfare, and Law Enforcement

As you can see, the state pays 585 billion dollars towards welfare each year, means that they pay about 50 billion - allowing for lee way again - each month on welfare. They could support the country with five hundred dollars each on two billion a month!

So, there is a lot of money here to spend. If they were to give 30 million people two hundred thousand dollars each for thier own businesses, then that would come to 6 000 000 000 as a once off. This will aloow the people to generate thier own businesses and then they will all reap rewards, for far less, and still be able to pay them thier five hundred dollars a month.

what is wrong with my plan?

[Charlatan]

The thing is there are needs that are not met, but the problem is that the people with the needs cannot afford to pay for them. The biggest need is housing and food - the bare necessities. Have you seen that squatter camp in brazil? huge!

If we want see them servicing thier own needs, they need income. If the state were to lend money to set up jobs for them, they would own the business, then collect taxes from thier new employees, then boost thier gdp by a bit too. I cannot see what is holding the state back from this, as it is so easy to get, you have your assets, you have greater resale value, and the benefits cannot be better.

[Charlatan]

Job creation in africa at the moment, as i heard on cnn, is led by a trend of entrepreneurship. It seems the trend to get networking and internet savy is growing and that leads to people making thier own way? If they were to all get jobs like this, they will see thier businesses grow if run properly, and then they will employ more people.

This will elad to competition between the newer businesses and the established businesses. The edge the new businesses have, is that nobody has gotten greedy yet. Imagine the boss, sitting at home. he doesn't care what is going on, he just wants to go yachting or buy up some stuff for his family! This greed and distant approach from the big boss, when compared to the small businesses boss, who is still passionate with his company, as he is intimate with the workings of it, always worrying, means that he will have a hands on edge that the big boss does not have.

I cannot find that story anymore, but i think it was on the seventeenth of september on cnn. Afro something it was called.

So, we have a lean new business coming out with no overheads, and we have a stagnating giant with lots of bonuses to pay. Another thing is that they will not take anything for granted and then will be a more competitive.

[grandpa]

Job creation in africa at the moment, as i heard
on cnn, is led by a trend of entrepreneurship.
It seems the trend to get networking and internet savy
is growing and that leads to people making thier own
way?

I won't see any of that money accruing to me. That's what I know.

I will add this:
Those who do enjoy success never truly "make their own way," though. Even a single transaction of wealth takes more than one person.

Grandpa h.

[Charlatan]

I won't see any of that money accruing to me. That's what I know.

I will add this:
Those who do enjoy success never truly "make their own way," though. Even a single transaction of wealth takes more than one person.

Grandpa h.

If only we could create needs? there are tons of people out there that need! If they were given jobs to satisfy needs of others, and those had jobs to satisfy needs of the former, then all needs are met, and everyone has a job. Except in the case of, yes you guessed it, big business!

[Charlatan]

To create jobs, we need to look at the needs of the country, or, more specifically, the town, or, even more specifically, the community.

If the entrepreneur had no money, yet a good idea, one that satisfies all of the community through a service that they can supply, then they would still need capital. So, where is there a shortage of 'manpower supply?' we have the food to feed the world, yet it goes hungry, so things need to change!

If the entrepreneur were to pitch his idea to a bank, they might supply him with the capital, even if they do not have any surety. this could be accomplished with a enquiry into the references of the client, or, a written or oral test to see if they know what they are doing. someone that worked as a green grocer's check out guy will know how to operate a cash register, know a bit about vegetables, and be able to handle stress. great. now hopefully he doesn't want to become a dentist? There are lots of trained skills out there, where people have interests and they can make do with a few tools to get the job done. All you should need is the references.

There are tons of skills out there. say a guy is good at training dogs? say he has an affinity with them? how does he pitch himself? well, the best reference you can get is a professionals reference, so doing some free work there and getting the reference, without pay, having the reference as pay, might set you up for a job later.

I am sure the banks would supply the credit. as a calculated risk, there are needs - maybe customers the person knows directly - or with so many business men there will be no chance of them all going down. now, when it comes to failing businesses, the stores can be sold, the tools are gone, and the bank will lose money. this would be true, except that with so many people taking out loans most of them should pull it off = let's say there is one success and five failures that month? Let's call this 'layman's risks?'

http://www.statisticbrain.com/startu...e-by-industry/

as we can see, vegetable sales people and child minding are right there at the top. Child minding doesn't even need tools!

Now, one of the six entrepreneurs gets it right. this means nominal costs and sale of premises, but, the catch I forgot to tell you about, is that the bank keeps the business if it succeeds and employs the person running it. This means the risk individually is high, but the combined risk of all those processes is nominal.

[Charlatan]

The best way to create jobs is to create needs. we can create needs with arousal in advertising, making people hungry for things. like, if your neighbour has a gardener, it might dawn on you to get on. So, wanting to leave all the gardening to teenagers, and get real jobs for people, we need to create needs that are not satisfied.

Think about this, if a supermarket brings in way more food than they need, there is still a need, but it is not urgent. If someone were to help out at a motor dealer, and then start building cars out of parts, they could make a hefty profit. this would put motor dealers out of business, but, the price of the car built will be cheaper, and then those with expertise that got put out of business will be able to use their knowledge to build their own cars. everyone wants a sports car, so, put those Toyota dealers out of business is what I say.

So, creating a supply could also make a way for an entrepreneur. if there is a supply at cheaper prices and more value, then the big business will go out of business, which is good! Imagine everyone buying food from a person in the community? that would make for way more jobs, as we decentralise the jobs away from big business. this starts small, and then there is interest. we can kiss the stock market goodbye if this happens though...

Thoughts?