Register (it's free)
Volconvo Debate Forums
Advertise Here »
Browse ad-free by donating
The Debate Forums Blogs | Donate Register (it's free) Chatroom Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read  
  Volconvo / Debate Forums / Science & Technology


This topic in Science & Technology is about The Cost of Daedalus.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Oct 3, 2005, 02:04 pm   #1 (permalink) (top)
Autolykos
Logical Phallussy
 
Autolykos's Avatar
 
Location: In your internets.
Posts: 2,991
The Cost of Daedalus

Space exploration has always fascinated me. Lately, I found renewed interest in the Daedalus Project , a mid-1970s creation of the British Interplanetary Society. To me, it still seems like the most feasible interstellar exploration mission today (barring any way to make ramscoops work). Being of a rather libertarian "bent", I've started wondering if it could be possible for a private organization to build and launch a Daedalus-type spacecraft in the near future. The chief concern, of course, is how much such a project would cost. That is what I'd like to put out to the forum: Is there any way to reasonably estimate the pricetag on the Daedalus Project? If so, how much would it be?

Thanks in advance for any and all responses. :)

- Rob
Autolykos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 3, 2005, 02:57 pm   #2 (permalink) (top)
PatrickHenry
9/11: Inside Job
 
PatrickHenry's Avatar
 
Location: Hawai'i, Big Island
Posts: 10,437
Quote:
Quote by: Autolykos
I've started wondering if it could be possible for a private organization to build and launch a Daedalus-type spacecraft in the near future.
The question on the table would be how the builders could recoup their investment. Any ideas on what returns could be realized by such a project?


"Arms in the hands of the citizens may be used at individual discretion for the defense of the country, the overthrow of tyranny or private self-defense." -- John Adams
PatrickHenry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 3, 2005, 03:07 pm   #3 (permalink) (top)
Autolykos
Logical Phallussy
 
Autolykos's Avatar
 
Location: In your internets.
Posts: 2,991
Like I said in "Scrapping the Space Program" over in Politics, the organization could charge people for the information its probes gathered. The price wouldn't have to be much -- most people would be interested in the pictures, so charging a few cents per picture could be profitable. I'd figure *a lot* of people would want to see them, being another solar system and all, and there'd hopefully be a whole lot of pictures taken...

- Rob
Autolykos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 3, 2005, 03:08 pm   #4 (permalink) (top)
Starboy
BANNED: Repeated insults
 
Posts: 4,828
The funny thing about that is that at the rate improvements are being made on telescopes it is very likely that by the time Daedalus reached its targets most if not all discoveries it could make would be old news.

Starboy
Starboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 3, 2005, 03:13 pm   #5 (permalink) (top)
Autolykos
Logical Phallussy
 
Autolykos's Avatar
 
Location: In your internets.
Posts: 2,991
Quote:
Quote by: Starboy
The funny thing about that is that at the rate improvements are being made on telescopes it is very likely that by the time Daedalus reached its targets most if not all discoveries it could make would be old news.

Starboy
Somehow I doubt that Earth-orbiting telescopes would be able to see planets orbiting Alpha Centauri with as much detail as probes orbiting those planets would be able to.

- Rob
Autolykos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 3, 2005, 09:19 pm   #6 (permalink) (top)
Starboy
BANNED: Repeated insults
 
Posts: 4,828
Quote:
Quote by: Autolykos
Somehow I doubt that Earth-orbiting telescopes would be able to see planets orbiting Alpha Centauri with as much detail as probes orbiting those planets would be able to.

- Rob
Fifty years is a long time. When they launched Hubble they were saying that earth based telescopes would not be able to exceed Hubble’s resolution and it is already happening and that was only twenty years ago. And that is here on earth. They are planning some very big scopes and they are making good progress on synthetic apertures. Besides what would it hurt to wait? The scopes get better, planet detecting techniques get better. We then have a much better idea of what systems to aim for and what sort of equipment to put on board.

Starboy
Starboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 12, 2005, 08:33 am   #7 (permalink) (top)
Livemike
Anarcho-capitalist
 
Posts: 296
Quote:
Quote by: Autolykos
Somehow I doubt that Earth-orbiting telescopes would be able to see planets orbiting Alpha Centauri with as much detail as probes orbiting those planets would be able to.

- Rob

Well there is a limit on magnification/resolution that depends the distance between the edges of the array. Logically if you want really good resolution you should the array orbit the sun to get maximum effective mirror size. I call it the Bloody Huge Array concept.
Livemike is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:57 pm.

Sponsors (become a sponsor)
xango, UK Car Insurance, Beauty Salon, Coach Handbags, Miele Vacuums, Plus Size Bras, Gambling, Bullhorn, Horses for Sale, Ventrilo Server, liquid vitamins, weight loss, Smiley Central, Monetise your website, Ventrilo Server, Dyson Vacuums, Hydroponics & Grow Lights, Offshore banking, beauty salons, Offshore banking, Connecticut Electric Rate, Retail Electric Providers Cirro Energy, LasVegas Vacations, Web Design, homes in hudson, Affordable Web Hosting, Texas Electric Rate Cirro Energy, Security Audit, Guy Factor, Gun Forums, Cheap Loan Debt Loans Cheap Flights Debt Consolidation
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.7.1 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0

© 2003–2008 Volconvo.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9