Adam's Rib

[Pooeypants]

drdino is quite hilarious, run by Kent Hovind isn't it? A convicted tax fraud.

Here's his Records.

[Meatros]

</span><blockquote><span class="smallfont">Quote:</span><hr size="1" />Originally Posted by (StoneWT,)
Yeah, something done to Adam after he was created wouldn't be passed on to his descendants. Did the giraffe's neck grow over the generations because it was stretched? If you chop off the tale of mice, are subsequent mice born without tails?

terstorm,

According to Genesis, God could not have created homosexuals. Adam and Eve, not to be confused with the modern Adam and Steve, were the only specially created humans. If they were gay, we wouldn't be here.

Have you read all of Genesis or at least the portion dealing with Creation?

www.drdino.com is a good place to start. Answers in Genesis is another good one. Most evolutionists that make sweeping claims have never examined the creationist position or have, perhaps, purposely chosen a straw man as representing creationism.<hr size="1" /></blockquote><span class='postcolor'>

It's funny that you would list both "Dr" Dino and AiG, seeing as AiG disagrees with a lot of what Kent Hovind has to say.

Incidentally, do you know what and where Dr. Dino got his degree in?

I like your generalization about evolutionists generalizing creationists-makes you look a little silly.

[ThorfinnSS]

Did anyone actually count their own ribs? - Besides Marilyn Manson of course. I definitely have an odd number. After seeing my X-ray at a chiropractor's office I started to wonder. I suppose there must be some evolutionary advantage to having one rib of an attenuated length. Maybe it helped my early ancestors hurl a spear more effectively at a mammoth. But, pre-Darwin, the same folks who gave you the actual number of angels who could fit on the head of a pin, came up with the creation from a rib dogma. Just curious about how widespread this attenuated/atrophied rib syndrome is. Maybe there are males with a full set, I haven't been up to the surreptitious counting in the gym - it might be misconstrued. How about an online count?

[Samildanach]

God needed Adams rib for the stem cells it contained of course. Eve was a biological clone of Adam however he just removed the y chromosome and replicated the existing X. Adam in effect was sleeping with himself.

[shunyadragon]

</span><blockquote><span class="smallfont">Quote:</span><hr size="1" />Originally Posted by (StoneWT,)
Yeah, something done to Adam after he was created wouldn't be passed on to his descendants. Did the giraffe's neck grow over the generations because it was stretched? If you chop off the tale of mice, are subsequent mice born without tails?

terstorm,

According to Genesis, God could not have created homosexuals. Adam and Eve, not to be confused with the modern Adam and Steve, were the only specially created humans. If they were gay, we wouldn't be here.

Have you read all of Genesis or at least the portion dealing with Creation?

www.drdino.com is a good place to start. Answers in Genesis is another good one. Most evolutionists that make sweeping claims have never examined the creationist position or have, perhaps, purposely chosen a straw man as representing creationism.<hr size="1" /></blockquote><span class='postcolor'>

I have looked closely at both and I have not found a valid scientific arguement in either site.

[ruiner]

Um haven't any of you realised that even if God took one of Adams ribs, Adams children would still have all their ribs? The story says God took Adams rib out, it doesn't say he changed Adams DNA at the same time

[Samildanach]

They probably forgot to mention it....must have been an oversight by the author.