M-theory.

[Charlatan]

M-theory - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This theory could lead to a great unification of vectors, as i see it, then we will understand the universe better. Basically, it takes each ingredient of the universe and puts them together into a 'cell' with eleven dimensions. This would lead us to understand the whole atom or whatever in all it's complexity. The problem is we cannot test it yet...

Now, if you want to teast this theory, you need to observe that there are actually eleven ingredients in the atomic structure, and that these only lie on the surface of our universe. If we were to keep looking downwards, we would keep seeing more little things in the mix of the atom. The thing now is to ask if what we work with is relevant. We think it is, what we work with gets us results, and basically we could not see it any other way than how we use it, basically.

Having eleven dimensions means it is could rather have eleven sides, like a dice. Each side would have a value on it, and then we could basically write our information onto each side, relating to gravity and the like. Seeing as how gravity is based on magnetism, we could say the graviton is polarised against that of the earth. That means that the earth has one pole and the mater has the other pole, or another pole. This means the magnetism comes from the centre of the earth, as if you pick up some earth and let go of it, it will be polarised to go back to the earth's surface.

Now, if you were to go into the earth and then observe how it is held together, you will see that the earth is held in place by the energy inside the earth, all coming towards the centre of the earth, so it is pulled there, holding earth together. How else could it work? All the earth would simply fly off and drift in space as the earth's core does not hold it together. But the heat is not the ingredient that holds the earth together, it is something else. On pluto the ice is held together by non heat based stuff, as it would be incredibly cold there. So, the earth is held together by a force where it pulls in towards itself and then means there is actually a pull force in the earth.

Observing the sun we can see that is pulls stuff inwards by gravitational pull, and exploded at some point leaving a reversed pull force. If something must explode first before it pulls, i call it an elastic force - imagine you pull the elastic as far apart as you can, then let go. The thing is, it is still pulling in, so these factors must be massive.

So, how does the earth pull the rock towards it? It would surely be bits of star that have also decided to pull inwards. these little bits of rock and gas are the planets we know today. That is just clearing up the graviton dilemma as best i can, but that is not essential to this thread.

Now, we have eleven instances of dimensions we work with. Seeing as how they can all be placed onto sides of a dice, we could roll the dice around to see what is on each side. But, there are not eleven dimensions! There are eleven sides. If we were to think of how many dimensions the dice has, there are only three, being relative to our world. If we were to then place these eleven dimensions into the dice, so that they overlap, then there are still only three dimensions, yet many strings inside the dice carrying information to opposite sides, adjacent sides, and the like.

[Medensis]

M-theory - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This theory could lead to a great unification of vectors, as i see it, then we will understand the universe better. Basically, it takes each ingredient of the universe and puts them together into a 'cell' with eleven dimensions. This would lead us to understand the whole atom or whatever in all it's complexity. The problem is we cannot test it yet...

Now, if you want to teast this theory, you need to observe that there are actually eleven ingredients in the atomic structure, and that these only lie on the surface of our universe. If we were to keep looking downwards, we would keep seeing more little things in the mix of the atom. The thing now is to ask if what we work with is relevant. We think it is, what we work with gets us results, and basically we could not see it any other way than how we use it, basically.

Having eleven dimensions means it is could rather have eleven sides, like a dice. Each side would have a value on it, and then we could basically write our information onto each side, relating to gravity and the like. Seeing as how gravity is based on magnetism, we could say the graviton is polarised against that of the earth. That means that the earth has one pole and the mater has the other pole, or another pole. This means the magnetism comes from the centre of the earth, as if you pick up some earth and let go of it, it will be polarised to go back to the earth's surface.

Now, if you were to go into the earth and then observe how it is held together, you will see that the earth is held in place by the energy inside the earth, all coming towards the centre of the earth, so it is pulled there, holding earth together. How else could it work? All the earth would simply fly off and drift in space as the earth's core does not hold it together. But the heat is not the ingredient that holds the earth together, it is something else. On pluto the ice is held together by non heat based stuff, as it would be incredibly cold there. So, the earth is held together by a force where it pulls in towards itself and then means there is actually a pull force in the earth.

Observing the sun we can see that is pulls stuff inwards by gravitational pull, and exploded at some point leaving a reversed pull force. If something must explode first before it pulls, i call it an elastic force - imagine you pull the elastic as far apart as you can, then let go. The thing is, it is still pulling in, so these factors must be massive.

So, how does the earth pull the rock towards it? It would surely be bits of star that have also decided to pull inwards. these little bits of rock and gas are the planets we know today. That is just clearing up the graviton dilemma as best i can, but that is not essential to this thread.

Now, we have eleven instances of dimensions we work with. Seeing as how they can all be placed onto sides of a dice, we could roll the dice around to see what is on each side. But, there are not eleven dimensions! There are eleven sides. If we were to think of how many dimensions the dice has, there are only three, being relative to our world. If we were to then place these eleven dimensions into the dice, so that they overlap, then there are still only three dimensions, yet many strings inside the dice carrying information to opposite sides, adjacent sides, and the like.

I suggest you read "The Grand Design" by Hawking. Very educational and very interesting. After walking the reader through the progression of science and physics over hundreds of years it eventually explains the basics of M-Theory. Hawking has a great sense of humor and articulates his points well. He presents both a layman explanation and an informed so you never miss out on understanding.

[Charlatan]

I suggest you read "The Grand Design" by Hawking. Very educational and very interesting. After walking the reader through the progression of science and physics over hundreds of years it eventually explains the basics of M-Theory. Hawking has a great sense of humor and articulates his points well. He presents both a layman explanation and an informed so you never miss out on understanding.

I was hoping you could debate me and tell me where i may be lacking understanding...

[Medensis]

I was hoping you could debate me and tell me where i may be lacking understanding...

On just about every level.

Before debating it I suggest you read the book. It's not too long and you can find it at about any book store. If you've got a burning desire to learn about physics and the logic behind it, I think you should also check out the Feynman Lectures from 1964. Look them up and buy them or find them for rent. It's great for novice understanding and Feynman is a master at layman explanation.

[Senor Hoint]

I suggest you read "The Grand Design" by Hawking. Very educational and very interesting.

That was a great book.

[truthreality]

Basically, it takes each ingredient of the universe and puts them together into a 'cell' with eleven dimensions.

Membranes in string theory are not the same as cells in biology.

Having eleven dimensions means it is could rather have eleven sides, like a dice.

Actually a dice is not a good example of the 11 dimensions in string theory. A dice only requires the first three dimensions: height, width and length. There are still 8 other dimensions.

[Charlatan]

Actually a dice is not a good example of the 11 dimensions in string theory. A dice only requires the first three dimensions: height, width and length. There are still 8 other dimensions.

This thread is supposed to suggest a way to test the m theory, as there is a problem testing it. So, if there are eleven dimenensions, and each dimension is three dimensional, then maybe there should be thirty three vectors with eleven values?

If you want to test it, you need to take two or three or more of these membranes or whatever, and compare them. If you find that they all share the same characteristics - in the case they are all the same thing values too - then you have seen first hand that they all are compatible.

Testing the m theory would mean taking them and subjecting them to change of the same type. If you get the same values again, considering you have done the same values of change to them, then you should see similarities again.

If you were to subject them to different values of tests, you should compare thse values to the similar types of tests on other things. If there is emerging a pattern, you have gotten that out of the way. Actually, if it resembles a pattern in any way, then you have tested and verified the thoery, yes?

My example of a dice is just to show the values of the membrane.

[Charlatan]

Have i said something good or is everyone just ignoring this thread now?

[Charlatan]

My theory of everything is that all matter is energy in the form of mass. this is because the energy is inside the mass, and energy itself is mass. i find it hard to see the higgs without mass, as then it would not be matter, yes?

Now, if energy, as i claim, is mass, is all matter potential, kinetic or whatever energy? without reactions you cannot have further reactions, and something must exist to react, and all things that react exist, but, do all things that exist have mass?

If they do, then you may as well throw out the complicated stuff you study and embrace my 'theory.' if not, well, please tell me where i am wrong...

[minorwork]

I'd shoot for a definition of time. Then work from there.

[Charlatan]

I'd shoot for a definition of time. Then work from there.

Isn't time a measurement of reactions between points?

[minorwork]

Reactions? I don't know about that. Time is something we measure. Motion, distance of one movement measured against a different movement. Nice that one is a regular change in distance like a pendulum or second hand, or sunup to sunup movement. http://milesmathis.com/time.html