![]() |
|
| The Debate Forums | Blogs | | | Donate | Register (it's free) | Chatroom | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||||
|
| | Thread Tools |
| | #1 (permalink) (top) | |
![]() Mass'Debator Posts: 4,724 | China unveils Moon probe images ![]() BBC NEWS | Asia-Pacific | China unveils Moon probe images Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #3 (permalink) (top) |
![]() Mass'Debator Posts: 4,724 | Why is it so important? Because possibly because nobody else has bothered to check on the moon in a couple of decades now besides the old skool Soviet/US space race. I feel that perhaps they found there could be some benifits to the Moon which perhaps those in NASA gave up on, or don't see.... I'm just interested to see if their studies and results match up to existing reports and studies. |
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) (top) | |
| Volcanic Erupter Posts: 3,066 | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #5 (permalink) (top) |
![]() Mass'Debator Posts: 4,724 | I thought you guys were supposed to be settling the moon in the 80's-early 90's? I remember growing up hearing them say on TV "In 10-15 years.... in another 10-15 years" I think NASA just doesn't have enough resources to tackle the moon as well as the space station. |
| | |
| | #7 (permalink) (top) |
| Volcanic Erupter Posts: 3,066 | Yes, that is true that U.S. felt a little too comfortable with its top position. Additionally, NASA gave up some projects. However, George (Bush) has already assigned enough funds for scientific research in order to support that project. Guys have appx.10 years to materialize that project along with the initial process with installing the main orbital station in space, to be served for stocking purposes. Then, a shuttle (from Earth) would go to that station and stores required materials. Astronauts pick that up and head to Moon to start establishing new lunar bases. |
| | |
| | #8 (permalink) (top) | |
| Igneous Magma Location: Southwest desert - Valley of the Sun Posts: 610 | Quote:
I can understand why the in crowd bumped off Pres' Lincoln & Kennedy, plus JFK's bro & MLK. Here is what our country threw away under Nixon's term: Google Moon And.. as for space stations.. we had quite a good one started & also trashed by the same bunch: Google Image Result for http://icb.nasa.gov/2003_Annual_Report/skylab_II.jpg Skylab was the world's first space station.. it looks like it could have been roomy & a great beginning for add-ons. | |
| | |
| | #9 (permalink) (top) |
| R-CA Posts: 59 | Century25, you should understand that in the wake of the expensive and unpopular Vietnam War, Congress also cut funds for the space program, which was also perceived as expensive and unnecessary. Part of the rationale for the Space Shuttle program was to maintain supremacy in the space race at a much lower cost. Nonetheless, we have been contributing heavily to the ISS, and have been accelerating our efforts recently. NASA should always be well-funded, though I'm not sure that repeatedly landing on the moon is the best use of those funds. |
| | |