![]() |
|
| The Debate Forums | Blogs | | | Donate | Register (it's free) | Chatroom | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||||
| | Thread Tools |
| | #21 (permalink) (top) |
![]() Fyrdman Location: Middlesbrough UK Posts: 4,152 | A just society requires arms to keep it so. The moment you take your pressure off, the moment government starts taking liberties. For instance, if you look at social policies up to the 1970's, social policy was very slowly moving left wing. But by then everyone was 'hey, i'm not doing too badly. your gonna tax me labour/democrat? i've voting tory/republican'. And then the government starts going right wing........and tada, we are right were we were in the 1900's. Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery. Winston Churchill |
| |
| | #22 (permalink) (top) | |
| Molten Ash Location: university of iowa, iowa Posts: 26 | Quote:
| |
| |
| | #23 (permalink) (top) |
| Igneous Magma Location: New York City Posts: 739 | Your model, G, is actually cyclical in nature. We democrats here in the US only get leftists in power right after hardline republicans mess up royally, and we get hardline republicans when complacency breeds moderate dems. I count Clinton as the fourth cycle since the depression. Why, if you want to reform the system, don't you do it at the top of the cycle, not the bottom? After all, if the only problem is a lack of judgement on the behalf of the people involved in terms of where their tax dollars are being spent, then isn't education the key? My grandfather worked for the CCC - it's plain to see that taxes aren't inherently bad. . . . whenever any government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute a new government, laying its foundations on such principles and organizing its powers in such forms as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. |
| |
| | #24 (permalink) (top) |
![]() Fyrdman Location: Middlesbrough UK Posts: 4,152 | Yes I've seen Trainspotting. Now if you combine it with Human Traffic, you know how everyone in Middlesbrough. If your not a smack head, your a pill popper or a thursday night binger. I know its cyclical. I havn't studied countries in much depth other than the US and the UK, and both systems go left when the right screws it up, when people are okay again they vote right wing, who then screw it up.... For gods sake people can you not see a pattern emerging? Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery. Winston Churchill |
| |
| | #25 (permalink) (top) |
![]() Fyrdman Location: Middlesbrough UK Posts: 4,152 | Although I don't see education as the key, if everybody was just as well educated they would still pay the street sweeper shit wages despite the PhD in physics, I see it as entirely neccesary for democracy. For example, the US 2000 election. You gotta see past charisma here, Gore may be boring but he isn't an idiot either. Actually, US elections in general. Now I was looking at some past platforms for US political parties and my god it's depressingly funny. You have planks like 'We're going to make America great again!". .... OMG! You would be laughed off the stage in the UK for that crap. We have "We will raise income tax by 1% across the board to raise £8billion to be spent on the NHS" Thats a fucking plank dammit. It just shows how much goes on charisma in the US that people can get away with such unspecific information. In the UK our parties produce manifestos with core pledges, that if the government don't do they will be pissed on by the press, and rightfully so since they were elected on them. It could also be because of gridlock. Anything you promise in the elections will be shot down by the opposition in the US anyway, while if any government actually lost a vote there would be an election a week later in the UK. Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery. Winston Churchill |
| |
| | #26 (permalink) (top) |
| Location: Finland Posts: 712 | Wow, a nice and working democracy you got in the US... Elect him because he spends the most money on blingbling in his election campaign, then if you don't like him, you can always shoot him. Come on, how come every other democratic country can live without guns (in the sense of everyone having the legal right to own one? That's the lamest excuse I've heard in a while. The only reason I can think of is that the government loves the money that comes from selling weapons, and the manifested firearm - mentality in the US. Now I do understand that - "everyone else's got one, I'm in a worse position if I don't have one" - thing. But that doesn't make it right. It has to start somewhere. It won't though...they're just such a damn good mean of income. *rolls eyes and pukes* |
| |
| | #27 (permalink) (top) | |
| Igneous Magma Location: New York City Posts: 739 | Quote:
. . . whenever any government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute a new government, laying its foundations on such principles and organizing its powers in such forms as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. | |
| |
| | #29 (permalink) (top) | |
| Molten Ash Posts: 143 | Quote:
In Thailand everyone knows kung fu so I think guns arnt all that necessary anyway. | |
| |
| | #30 (permalink) (top) | |
| Molten Ash Location: ontario canada Posts: 104 | Quote:
In Thailand everyone knows kung fu so I think guns arnt all that necessary anyway. [/b][/quote] every azn totally knows kung fu lol wtf??111@ | |
| |