![]() |
|
| The Debate Forums | Blogs | | | Donate | Register (it's free) | Chatroom | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||||
|
| | Thread Tools |
| | #1 (permalink) (top) |
| BANNED Posts: 5,021 | The upper class vs. the lower class It seems to me that there are some people here who think that the lower class have a right to use the government to make the upper class pay for the lower class' services. I think that's the biggest flaw of government. Anyone else? |
| | |
| | #2 (permalink) (top) | |
| Wyatts Torch Location: America Posts: 28 | Quote:
Cortez the killer | |
| | |
| | #3 (permalink) (top) |
| Principled Observer Location: Toledo, Ohio Posts: 13,873 | It seems to me that classism is another ism. If one group seeks and gains an unfair, unjust advantage in law to significantly affect the rights of the other group, it is a form of descrimination or favoritism, which goes against the concept that all men are viewed equal under the eyes of the law. I am not saying I support any type of socialist ideal. I think the people T-Man are referring to are people who embrace socialist principles. Petition of Redress of Grievances: http://www.givemeliberty.org/default.htm Canadian Lawsuit Against Their National Banks: http://www.freewebs.com/classaction/ Osborn F. Enready |
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) (top) | |
| BANNED-Warned multiple times about instigating. User then reported topics multiple times to mess with staff. Posts: 4,412 | Quote:
While they do that, I would agree that government has to attempt to correct the problems that ensue. | |
| | |
| | #5 (permalink) (top) | |
| Wyatts Torch Location: America Posts: 28 | Quote:
The government attempts to correct problems faced by the poor involve raising taxes on beer, cable teevee an cigarettes and transfering that revenue into payrolls; while at the same time screaming bloody blue murder about the rich getting richer. Thankfully for the Democratic party the poor are also not too bright, and are willing to pay more and more for their smokes and still vote in lockstep. Cortez the killer | |
| | |
| | #6 (permalink) (top) | |
| Look Stuff Up Posts: 810 | Quote:
Most wealth is not inherited in this country, but was mostly earned in the current generation. Most took great risks financially and work outrageous hours a week and employ people. I'm sure the wealthy don't mind paying a tax, but I think they also do mind the attituded of some that are jealous of their assets. They do mind the politics of class warfare. One of the Ten Commandments is "Thou shall not covet thy neighbor's goods", so in communism, socialism and class warfare where they covet another's goods, that is a sin! The poor pay no income tax. | |
| | |
| | #7 (permalink) (top) | |
| Look Stuff Up Posts: 810 | Quote:
In the United States, the wealthy by far pay the lion's share of all the taxes and the poor pay zero income tax. Most of the wealth in this country was earned in one generation by special individuals who worked their butt off and probably took risks in starting a business and going through the hell of employing people. The government has no business redistributing wealth, that is communism. I can't think of any upper class services the poor pay for. Please make a nice list for us please of examples, because it seems like a total fabrication that logic can't justify. I know the top 10% of earners pay some rediculous portion of all the income tax. Like some 75-90%. How the wealthy can be paying far more than they use and still have the poor paying for their serviced doesn't make sense to me. :-) | |
| | |
| | #8 (permalink) (top) | ||||
| technę Posts: 2,459 | Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
remember: 100k = 30% taxes 10k = 3%......so it is fairly even if you ask me.... Here is GodBlessAmericas logic in a nutshell:::::::: "God bless America and nobody else" | ||||
| | |
| | #10 (permalink) (top) |
| Igneous Magma Posts: 353 | I think there's no such thing as democracy so it doesn't matter what I think Australian Parliamentary Simulator Aussies: Welcome to the Rudd Regime Yanks: Welcome to Hell Now Purgatory. Others: G'day mate. |
| | |
| | #11 (permalink) (top) | |||
| Igneous Magma Posts: 563 | Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
| |||
| | |
| | #12 (permalink) (top) | |
| Igneous Magma Posts: 563 | Quote:
There is more upper class welfare than poor welfare in America these days. | |
| | |
| | #13 (permalink) (top) | |
| Beloved Truth-Dragon Location: Texas Posts: 1,299 | The upper class does account for the majority of the tax revenue. Quote:
![]() No whining about the fairness of the progressive income tax. If you're paying 30%, you can afford to. I don't know if I think there's a better way, but it'll suffice as far as I'm concerned. If only I could saith, so should I. | |
| | |
| | #14 (permalink) (top) |
| Redskins Rule Location: South-Western Virginia Posts: 2,451 | The lowest 20% make on average 14900.00 a year, pay about 5% of their incomes in taxes and therefore live off of 14155.00 a year. The middle 20%, 51500.00 a year, 20% in taxes, live off of 41200.00 a year and the top 20% average 182700.00 a year, pay 25% in taxes and live off of 137025.00 a year. Which group would you rather belong to, percentage difference in tax rates or no? Percentage of total tax burden is almost an irrelavant statistic. The question is who lives better. Who can afford to have their tax rates go up? Even if the top 20 paid twice as much in taxes as they do, they would still make more than more than 3 times as much as the bottom 20. That is the relavant issue here. All I see when I look down, something jumpin' on the ground, Scratchin' dirt, cluckin' in the barnyard - Tell me, could that be you? John Kay |
| | |
| | #15 (permalink) (top) |
| Redskins Rule Location: South-Western Virginia Posts: 2,451 | Oh, and the top 20% control 50 of the nations aggragate income as well, so their tax burden is not that skewed. All I see when I look down, something jumpin' on the ground, Scratchin' dirt, cluckin' in the barnyard - Tell me, could that be you? John Kay |
| | |
| | #16 (permalink) (top) |
| Redskins Rule Location: South-Western Virginia Posts: 2,451 | A progressive tax is not class warfare. Rich people drive on the roads, are protected by the same army, and often send their kids to the same schools. They get social security checks when they reach 65 or 62, depending on choice, have their bank deposits protected up to what FDIC covers, get the same police and fire protection, same water, same CIA, same Medicare,etc. So what if they don't get welfare payments. Neither does anyone in the top four fiths. Give me a friggin break, please. All I see when I look down, something jumpin' on the ground, Scratchin' dirt, cluckin' in the barnyard - Tell me, could that be you? John Kay |
| | |
| | #18 (permalink) (top) |
| Look Stuff Up Posts: 810 | Rez, here in CA if you make money, your tax between the Federal and State comes in close to 48%. If you earn a million, you pay maybe over $400,000 in taxes. If you earn $15,000, you maybe between the Federal and State you may pay at most 5% or $750. The person paying the $400,000 is paying a lot of tax, and though they mostly don't mind, they could do without the BS class warfare attitude. |
| | |
| | #19 (permalink) (top) |
| Principled Observer Location: Toledo, Ohio Posts: 13,873 | My opinion, abolish the IRS, cut down federal government to its bare essentials for national security WHICH MEANS DEFENSE, and not invasion money for pet wars like Iraq, remove all unconstitutional government agencies, and laws. Petition of Redress of Grievances: http://www.givemeliberty.org/default.htm Canadian Lawsuit Against Their National Banks: http://www.freewebs.com/classaction/ Osborn F. Enready |
| | |
| | #20 (permalink) (top) |
| BANNED Posts: 5,021 | LOL! I love how the liberal spinmasters of this board have done a flip flop on the topic and basically made up a complete lie that the upper class take money from the lower class! LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!! If these projects are so dispicable, THEN WHY NOT END TAXES?! Obviously you lower class morons are getting screwed over by these taxes, so why not end them?! |
| | |