![]() |
|
| The Debate Forums | Blogs | | | Donate | Register (it's free) | Chatroom | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||||
|
| | Thread Tools |
| | #1 (permalink) (top) |
| Pure Energy Posts: 438 | In the shadow. The phrase, "Beyond a shadow of a doubt", has always seemed like a very malleable term for serious courtroom proceedings. There seems so many ways to translate it. My question is 2-part: 1) What does the phrase actually mean in laymen's terms? 2) Could a better phrase be used, what is it, and why? Curious in "Philogia", Dadoo Heartbeat, the only song you will not hear until it's gone. |
| | |
| | #2 (permalink) (top) | ||
![]() Right of Center Location: San Diego, CA Posts: 3,007 | Quote:
Quote:
"You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life." -- Winston Churchill | ||
| | |
| | #5 (permalink) (top) |
![]() Throbbing Member Location: Old Europe Posts: 7,444 | "Beyond a reasonable doubt" always seemed better to me since doubt is always possible. Of course, the problem then is what is reasonable. "I wish I was as cocksure of anything as Tom Macaulay is of everything." -- Viscount Melbourne |
| | |
| | #6 (permalink) (top) |
| I'm the camel Location: Maryland Posts: 657 | One person's criteria for 'beyond a shadow of a doubt' certainly differs very much from another's, based on my infrequent experiences as a juror. And people also differ in what they consider to be reasonable. A lot of arm twisting goes on in juries, that does not serve well to promote either the cause of truth or justice. |
| | |