</span><blockquote><span class="smallfont">Quote:</span><hr size="1" />Originally Posted by (bayou)
The fallacy comes from the word: "free market". Nature in general is a highly integrated whole that is not a free system, it is a complex collection of regulating systems that create stability. A market on a small scale might seem free but as capitalism expands it will run into environmental barriers that cannot be exceeded: regulation is inneviteable in one form or another. Whether it is nature liquidating humanity or humanity regulating itself is what is the final question we must answer.<hr size="1" /></blockquote><span class='postcolor'>
What does that have to do with the fact that extortion is wrong? Would you mind breaking that paragraph down and translating it into something that doesn't sound like bullshit? "Whether it is nature liquidating humanity or humanity regulating itself is what is the final question we must answer." <---what the hell is that? We must answer? In order to...what?
</span><blockquote><span class="smallfont">Quote:</span><hr size="1" />Originally Posted by (Bayou,)
Sorry to break up that utopic dream of yours, regulations are inneviteable.<hr size="1" /></blockquote><span class='postcolor'>
Regulations imposed by what on who?
</span><blockquote><span class="smallfont">Quote:</span><hr size="1" />Originally Posted by (Bayou,)
Have you been reading the debate here, According to Apetberg and JacknBeans that is supposedly the nature of government.<hr size="1" /></blockquote><span class='postcolor'>
I don't believe in "government." Either does Jackney. Why would we go about ascribing characteristics to something that you haven't even proved exists yet?



Reply With Quote
Bookmarks