Mainstream media reports Obama's birth certificate a fraudulent document

[linda_mary_13]

The mainstream media has reported the findings of a special task force that the long form birth certificate of Barak Obama, presented by the White House, is a fraud.

Why then, is this revelation not being discussed by the mainstream media, especially in this election year. Are we to assume the American press, the watch "dogs" accept fraudulent documents, lawlessness, feloneous behavior in order to advance "their" ideology aka "vomit"?

This is not put forth to debate whether Obama is a citizen, but rather is the mainstream media relevant today? Was and is their only purpose to dance with the devil and spin the facts?

I might add, the silence comes from both sides of the political spectrum, and the revelation of the fraud comes from "the people". Dems and Repubs are two wings of the same bird!

Before commenting, ask yourself why you didn't know for certain this document was a fraud, especially if you think of yourself as "informed", and why haven't you screamed to the high heaven that this is unacceptable!

[Maryjane]

Source?

[Yarn]

Source?

I think it has something to do with a discredited ex-law enforcement official and a group of tea partiers conducting an "investigation" into a case that has already been thoroughly reviewed by the courts, including ones controlled by conservative judges, and found lacking in any real merit.
Arpaio to Santorum: No endorsement until my probe of Obama complete - National Law Enforcement | Examiner.com

[Maryjane]

Thanks. Did a little detective work of my own.

"Despite the mainstream media’s absence"...

(snip)

"SUN CITY WEST – As the media blackout continues,"

Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse | April 4, 2012 | Sonoran News

As per the OP

The mainstream media has reported the findings of a special task force

I'm confused. The media is or isn't reporting this?

[linda_mary_13]

I think it has something to do with a discredited ex-law enforcement official and a group of tea partiers conducting an "investigation" into a case that has already been thoroughly reviewed by the courts, including ones controlled by conservative judges, and found lacking in any real merit.
Arpaio to Santorum: No endorsement until my probe of Obama complete - National Law Enforcement | Examiner.com

So are you saying you accept the fraudulent document because it has been brought to your attention by a group you disagree with?

What is your source that THIS issue has been thoroughly reviewed by the courts? It is just being introduced and has not been brought to the courts as of yet. The issue is not Obama, it is WHO is responsible for putting out this fraudulent document to the American people FROM the White House. Forgery is the issue, not Obama's birthplace.

[linda_mary_13]

Maryjane, do you hear any discussion of the forgery that has occurred? Are you confused by the lack of reporting? Is it news worthy that forged documents are coming from the White House for your consumption?

Or maybe, you're supposed to be confused!

[Yarn]

So are you saying you accept the fraudulent document because it has been brought to your attention by a group you disagree with?

I am saying I don't trust the group as an authority.

What is your source that THIS issue has been thoroughly reviewed by the courts?

This claim has, for one reason or another, been dismissed or ruled against by all 20 courts with which it has been filed, including conservative courts.
Barack Obama presidential eligibility litigation - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[linda_mary_13]

Again, this is NOT a question of presidential eligibility, it IS a question of FORGED documents being offered to the American people by this White House.

Lack of trust of our governmental system is universal, which is why WE need to look at the individual facts before us.

[Yarn]

it IS a question of FORGED documents.

It is an allegation of forged documents advanced by those who stereotypically can't tell the difference between public health care and Hitler, and it has been rejected by the courts on a bipartisan basis.

Lack of trust of our governmental system is universal,

Speak for yourself. I have my concerns, but the ability of government courts to deliver generally accurate verdicts and dismissals on issues of forensics isn't one of them.

[linda_mary_13]

It is an allegation being made by professionals in law enforcement. It is these same law enforcement professionals that the court relys on to assist them in delivering their generally accurate verdicts. These professionals have consulted with EXPERTS in the field of photo shopping and they along with frankly, amateurs, have concluded that the long form birth certificate is a FORGERY

By the way, this has nothing to do with healthcare, Hitler, democrat or republican.
This is ALL about what is being fed to the American people by a corrupt forgerer.
They do have a person of interest by the way. Why would you want to confuse this issue with healthcare?

[Yarn]

It is an allegation being made by professionals in law enforcement. It is these same law enforcement professionals that the court relys on to assist them in delivering their generally accurate verdicts. These professionals have consulted with EXPERTS in the field of photo shopping and they along with frankly, amateurs, have concluded that the long form birth certificate is a FORGERY

The same "photoshop experts" who have already been irrefutably identified as quacks on this issue.

The release of the certificate in 2008 resulted in a fresh round of questions. It was asserted that the certificate had been digitally forged with Adobe Photoshop and lacked a stamped seal of the state, which led them to demand that Obama release his "original" 1961 birth certificate.[25] Jerome Corsi, author of the book The Obama Nation: Leftist Politics and the Cult of Personality, told Fox News that "the campaign has a false, fake birth certificate posted on their website... it's been shown to have watermarks from Photoshop. It's a fake document that's on the Web site right now, and the original birth certificate the campaign refuses to produce."[7] This view was rejected by FactCheck.org, which viewed the Obama campaign's hard copy of the Certification of Live Birth and reported that:


FactCheck.org staffers have now seen, touched, examined and photographed the original birth certificate. We conclude that it meets all of the requirements from the State Department for proving U.S. citizenship. Claims that the document lacks a raised seal or a signature are false. We have posted high-resolution photographs of the document as "supporting documents" to this article. Our conclusion: Obama was born in the U.S.A. just as he has always said.[7]

Barack Obama citizenship conspiracy theories - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"Smart people believe weird things because they are skilled at defending beliefs they arrived at for nonsmart reasons."
Michael Shermer » Smart People Believe Weird Things

By the way, this has nothing to do with healthcare, Hitler, democrat or republican.

Of course bias is relevant. Numerous sources I trust say this forgery claim is a hoax. Yet I am supposed to ignore their word and their findings, and instead trust people whom lack any established history or profile of objectivity?

[linda_mary_13]

Say no more Yarn, your bias to accept factcheck.org over current findings of law enforcement professionals says it all!

The findings of the investigation show the misssing stamps/seals in question in 2008, that now appear on the long form birth certificate were brought into the document and NOT part of the original document. You're using old data to argue the current findings.