![]() |
|
| The Debate Forums | Blogs | | | Donate | Register (it's free) | Chatroom | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||||
|
| | Thread Tools |
| | #82 (permalink) (top) |
| Igneous Magma Posts: 370 | I don't know when the US constitution was codified and ratified but I do know the first few US Presidents weren't American born. I've made an issue of the 14th amendment before for all US Citizens to have equal rights. Anyone who is a US Citizen has the right to be president if they want. Otherwise everything is built on a false premise and the US is lying to itself anyway Australian Political Discussion Site Aussies: Welcome to the Rudd Regime Yanks: Welcome to Hell Now Purgatory. Others: G'day mate. |
| | |
| | #84 (permalink) (top) |
| Skeptical Patriot Posts: 7,836 | Then you are saying there should be NO restrictions or qualifiers for the presidency? Would your only requirement be citizenship and a pulse? How about age? We have a few 18 year-olds on this forum who are sharper than a lot of middle aged people I know. They can vote so by your logic they absolutely MUST have the right to be president too. Be careful what you wish for... |
| | |
| | #85 (permalink) (top) | |
![]() Volcanic Erupter Location: Los Angeles, CA Posts: 7,333 | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #86 (permalink) (top) |
| Skeptical Patriot Posts: 7,836 | Well, then why all the fuss about being natural born? Strictly following the equality argument the fact that you can vote should make you elegible to run for prez. You can join in deciding who runs the country, you can fight for your country, you can marry, start a business and do ANYTHING an older American can do so why can't you LEAD your country? That is equality, ain't it? |
| | |
| | #87 (permalink) (top) |
![]() Throbbing Member Location: Old Europe Posts: 7,444 | Any restrictions pertaining to age, place of birth, etc. will exclude some people unfit for office and exclude others who would be great. That's the nature of arbitrary rules. I'm not sure most 17-year-olds are mature enough to reponsibly drive a car, but then a lot of 50-year-olds aren't either. I figure if you're entitled to vote, you should be entitled to stand for office. Period. No matter how big a twit you may be. Hey tinybear, you going for a thousand posts in your first month? Not bad. "I wish I was as cocksure of anything as Tom Macaulay is of everything." -- Viscount Melbourne |
| | |
| | #88 (permalink) (top) | |
![]() Fire the Liars Location: California Posts: 7,090 | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #91 (permalink) (top) | |
![]() Fire the Liars Location: California Posts: 7,090 | Our current warlord is proof we need MORE restrictions on presidential candidates, not less. Honesty was an unwritten prerequisite. Since honesty has been vetoed, maybe its time to write it in. In the past the media called for resignation of liars. Those days are postponed or dead. Felons(see snippet below)[, Mentally retarded and Genetic defects should be disqualified from presidential consideration. Below is a clip from a letter to the pentagon from Buzzflash Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #92 (permalink) (top) |
| Igneous Magma Posts: 370 | I read it somewhere (NYT probably) , I don't know jack about american presidents and I don't particularly want to. Australian Political Discussion Site Aussies: Welcome to the Rudd Regime Yanks: Welcome to Hell Now Purgatory. Others: G'day mate. |
| | |