Register (it's free)
Volconvo Debate Forums
Advertise Here »
Browse ad-free by donating
The Debate Forums Blogs | Donate Register (it's free) Chatroom Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read  
  Volconvo / Debate Forums / Politics & Government


This topic in Politics & Government is about The European Dream.

Reply  
 
Thread Tools
Old Nov 13, 2004, 09:49 am   #41 (permalink) (top)
Nono
Throbbing Member
 
Nono's Avatar
 
Location: Old Europe
Posts: 7,134
Quote:
Originally posted by tusaki
The fun about the EU is that it's new. Supposidly, in the future, there are huge benefits of becoming one entity. However, the main benefit of the EU, and the only one in mind when it was formed, was to change the mode of thinking.
The British writer Tim Parks thinks that the greatest benefit is being in that psychological groove and building for the future. Whether Europe ever actually gets built is secondary, as long as the building process keeps us from trying to castrate each other.

Quote:
You might now see yourself as british, while just a while ago, you might have seen yourself as a "south-wales-er" or "londoner".
Another of Rifkin's points in the interview is that young people today -- well, maybe not braying young British Tories, but most young people -- already think of themselves as European, just as many more Swiss young people think of themselves first and foremost as Swiss (rather than Graubündner or Vaudois, say) than a generation ago.

The test of the pudding is in the eating.


"I wish I was as cocksure of anything as Tom Macaulay is of everything."
-- Viscount Melbourne
Nono is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 13, 2004, 01:10 pm   #42 (permalink) (top)
Suburbanite
BANNED
 
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 3,203
It is amazing to me that Europe still has not saught out to institute any kind of American styled federal government. Minus the Sen. everything else would be of huge benefit to the average European. In terms of trade and such I think they are on the right track and have come to realize the importance of unity, but still seem to underestimate the United States, a country with citizens who would kill a man for their shoes is bound to have leaders who would take over a country for power and money. The struggle is something I look forward to though, it should be a tough battle.
Suburbanite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 13, 2004, 02:09 pm   #43 (permalink) (top)
Scribbler1
Skeptical Patriot
 
Scribbler1's Avatar
 
Posts: 7,746
Sub,
I agree. On paper, it would seem an easy transition to a United Europe as there is a United States.
What I am getting a sense of here is a fear of losing one's national identity. I don't see that s an issue as time goes on, as you see the same thing here in the U.S..
Many states have their own identity. "Don't mess with Texas" is a nice slogan but it doesn't mean they are afraid they'll be invaded by New Mexico. We all speak english but there are identifiable regional dialects. We have states governments and we can freely travel interstate. European nations could just as easily become states in a U.E. and , as you said, enjoy the benefits of a single entity without sacrifying too much.

As far as it actually happening, I feel this is inevitable, but it won't happen overnight. I think the strongest and most time-tested analogy I can think of is the "camel's nose under the tent" example of inevitability. It starts small but, once begun it usually does NOT stop.
If the prevailing attitude is "the E.U. is fine, but that's as far as we will allow it to go", just give it a generation or so and then talk to an 80 year-old and ask how it was back in the early 2000's.


Not a day goes by that I don't see something that reinforces my belief that people are idiots.
Scribbler1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 13, 2004, 02:17 pm   #44 (permalink) (top)
Nono
Throbbing Member
 
Nono's Avatar
 
Location: Old Europe
Posts: 7,134
Right, a loose loose federation is all that's necessary. (Something like Switzerland as a matter of fact.) Then let people identify with it at their own speed.

The really tought part is foreign policy. Nobody's going to take you seriously as a United States of Anything until you have a joint foreign policy. But imagine asking the French or the British -- to name but two -- to give that up.


"I wish I was as cocksure of anything as Tom Macaulay is of everything."
-- Viscount Melbourne
Nono is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 13, 2004, 05:07 pm   #45 (permalink) (top)
Scribbler1
Skeptical Patriot
 
Scribbler1's Avatar
 
Posts: 7,746
Quote:
Originally posted by Nono,
   
The really tought part is foreign policy. Nobody's going to take you seriously as a United States of Anything until you have a joint foreign policy. But imagine asking the French or the British -- to name but two -- to give that up.
That's why I always stress these things will take time. The French and British is a good example. They were enemies, then they were friends, then they were enemies, etc.. and without some kind of joint, unifying power they could go that route again.

Interesting side note: There could have been a Channel Tunnel a bit less than 100 years ago. They had a workable design and felt it could be accomplished. It was proposed and approved by England and France, but the idea was killed by the British military who, although they were friends at the time saw the possibility of that changing and didn't want a tunnel built that would allow the French army to just walk over to England.


Not a day goes by that I don't see something that reinforces my belief that people are idiots.
Scribbler1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 13, 2004, 08:35 pm   #46 (permalink) (top)
Lava
Igneous Magma
 
Posts: 716
Actually they did start building it. The descent shafts are still in place.

Lava
Lava is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 13, 2004, 08:37 pm   #47 (permalink) (top)
Lava
Igneous Magma
 
Posts: 716
Well, I'll duck out of the euro question because I dont think you guys are really applying yourselves on this. Have fun,

Lava
Lava is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 14, 2004, 03:44 pm   #48 (permalink) (top)
Nono
Throbbing Member
 
Nono's Avatar
 
Location: Old Europe
Posts: 7,134
Lava, one thing that has made this difficult is the sheer difficulty of deciphering your replies. I don't know what sort of web program you have, but it apparently denies you use of the clarity afforded by the vaious tools on Volconvo.

And what seemed to me wilful refusal to see the point about railway gauges.

Also your tenacious claim that words like "sclerotic" rendered debate impossible. Jeez, no debate then.


"I wish I was as cocksure of anything as Tom Macaulay is of everything."
-- Viscount Melbourne
Nono is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 14, 2004, 03:55 pm   #49 (permalink) (top)
Lava
Igneous Magma
 
Posts: 716
[QUOTE Nono

> Lava, one thing that has made this difficult is the sheer difficulty of deciphering your replies. I don't know what sort of web program you have, but it apparently denies you use of the clarity afforded by the vaious tools on Volconvo.

I dont follow you there. The V quote system is a total pain ime.


> And what seemed to me wilful refusal to see the point about railway gauges.

I dont recall you making one. Remind me?


> Also your tenacious claim that words like "sclerotic" rendered debate impossible. Jeez, no debate then.

my claim there was rather that your inability to tell us what it meant made the use of that word meaningless. It is by definition only meaningful if you can give us a meaning for it, since the dictionaries I looked in all failed to deliver any definition relevant to our discussion

But I dont think any of this is the problem with this thread,


Lava
Lava is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 16, 2004, 01:53 am   #50 (permalink) (top)
rmnunez
Volcanic Erupter
 
rmnunez's Avatar
 
Location: Mexico City
Posts: 4,772
Sclerotic as in anorexically thin, weakened, lacking in any substance whatsoever?


Et semel emissum volat irrevocabile verbum.
Raúl M. Núñez Sheriff
rmnunez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 16, 2004, 08:50 am   #51 (permalink) (top)
Lava
Igneous Magma
 
Posts: 716
OK, so far Ive had think skinned, stiff, thin, weakened, lacking any substance... these are all precise descriptions of SKIN but not of an economy. Apply those words to an economy and they could be interpreted to mean almost anything.

No-one has yet been willing or able to tell us exactly what aspects of the euro economy 'sclerotic' means are amiss in what way. With no such definition, I say it remains meaningless.


Lava
Lava is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 16, 2004, 02:58 pm   #52 (permalink) (top)
Nono
Throbbing Member
 
Nono's Avatar
 
Location: Old Europe
Posts: 7,134
Man, I've been trying to tell you: means rigid and refers to perceived lack of the much-ballyhooed "flexibility" of neo-liberal/utopian markets: hired today, fired tomorrow (cause labour is suddenly cheaper in Ruritania, whatever).


"I wish I was as cocksure of anything as Tom Macaulay is of everything."
-- Viscount Melbourne
Nono is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 16, 2004, 03:15 pm   #53 (permalink) (top)
Texans 4 Furors
BANNED
 
Posts: 179
The European Dream is the American Nightmare. Europe is the problem, not the solution.
Texans 4 Furors is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 16, 2004, 03:25 pm   #54 (permalink) (top)
Nono
Throbbing Member
 
Nono's Avatar
 
Location: Old Europe
Posts: 7,134
Quote:
Originally posted by Texans 4 Furors
Europe is the problem, not the solution.
Another one-liner. How about backing it up with a little something resembling argument?


"I wish I was as cocksure of anything as Tom Macaulay is of everything."
-- Viscount Melbourne
Nono is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 16, 2004, 03:41 pm   #55 (permalink) (top)
Lava
Igneous Magma
 
Posts: 716
[quote=Nono,]

> Man, I've been trying to tell you: means rigid

I know you have. Not stoopid ya know :)


> and refers to perceived lack of the much-ballyhooed "flexibility" of neo-liberal/utopian markets: hired today, fired tomorrow (cause labour is suddenly cheaper in Ruritania, whatever).

ah, finally, a relevant meaning: the inability to hire and fire at whim.


Lava
Lava is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 16, 2004, 03:43 pm   #56 (permalink) (top)
Sonart
It's simply logical
 
Sonart's Avatar
 
Location: San Diego
Posts: 4,551
Google -- "united Europe" superpower

Read anything. Europeans are increasingly disenchanted with America's belligerent hegemony and are talking more and more, especially with the success of the Euro and Union, about a united Europe as a new economic and political superpower to oppose U.S. dominance.


I don't suffer from insanity... I thoroughly enjoy it
Sonart is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 16, 2004, 03:55 pm   #57 (permalink) (top)
Nono
Throbbing Member
 
Nono's Avatar
 
Location: Old Europe
Posts: 7,134
Yes, ideally I would not want to see more than a very loose European federation. But when I look at the US these days and see how free it feels to do whatever it pleases, tighter somehow starts looking more attractive.


"I wish I was as cocksure of anything as Tom Macaulay is of everything."
-- Viscount Melbourne
Nono is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 16, 2004, 03:59 pm   #58 (permalink) (top)
Texans 4 Furors
BANNED
 
Posts: 179
Quote:
Originally posted by Nono,+--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='0' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Nono,)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteBegin-Texans 4 Furors
Europe is the problem, not the solution.
Another one-liner. How about backing it up with a little something resembling argument?[/b][/quote]
What's to argue?
Texans 4 Furors is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 16, 2004, 09:31 pm   #59 (permalink) (top)
Sonart
It's simply logical
 
Sonart's Avatar
 
Location: San Diego
Posts: 4,551
Quote:
What's to argue?
Well first, who are the Europeans a problem for? Europe? Nah. Uncontested American global hegemony. There ya go.


I don't suffer from insanity... I thoroughly enjoy it
Sonart is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 17, 2004, 08:52 pm   #60 (permalink) (top)
castille
Citizen #21521
 
Posts: 2,599
What's the difference between a united Europe and an aggressive American superpower?

Nothing.

They're both a threat to world harmony and peace. Europe is not a lovey dovey peacelover (just as the French why they sold weapons to the Hutu Power government in their extermination of 1 million Rwandans), and neither is the US.

Just because Europeans love each other won't mean they'll love any non-European races.


Ideological loyalty is the act of giving your soul to a vague concept, to be manipulated by people smarter than you.
castille is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:28 pm.

Sponsors (become a sponsor)
Online Gambling, KFUPM ePrints, Double Glazing UK, Free Online Games, xango, UK Car Insurance, Beauty Salon, Beauty Salons, Coach Handbags, Miele Vacuums, Plus Size Bras, Horses for Sale, Ventrilo Server, liquid vitamins, weight loss, Smiley Central, Monetise your website, Ventrilo Server, Dyson Vacuums, Hydroponics & Grow Lights, Offshore banking, beauty salons, Offshore banking, Connecticut Electric Rate, Retail Electric Providers Cirro Energy, LasVegas Vacations, Web Design, homes in hudson, Affordable Web Hosting, Texas Electric Rate Cirro Energy, Security Audit, Guy Factor, Gun Forums, Mortgage Fast Loans Dish Network Debt Help Freelance
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.7.3 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0

© 2003–2008 Volconvo.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10