Quite A Humurous Little Dialogue

[Dislogic]

ok well i must say i found this very amusing... not sure if anyone else has seen this but i would love to be the one to bring it here. Its very true for the most part too, if you think about it logically!

click here - http://asdfg.mine.nu/\

all in all some very funny stuff going on.

[Paavo]

yeah, I read that. It's great.

Also, click the "another one" link.

[Dislogic]

Originally posted by Paavo@Sep 1 2003, 07:56 PM
yeah, I read that. It's great.

Also, click the "another one" link.

lol yeah i did click that. its funny... and fairly true for that matter.

[Sodfather]

Haha, good article, good article, I'll give you that. Personally I liked the Saudi Arabia part. :)

[GreatWyrm of Babylon]

Lame, making up a story where you are the good guy does not require talent because you control all the dialog, and can simply leave out anything that points at weak logic...

[Dislogic]

true but it still carries some of the more obvious truths to light that the current US administration does not acknowledge and decides to ignore if they are ever questioned about them.

[GreatWyrm of Babylon]

I ignore ignorant personal attacks as well, what is your point. Some of the bible thummpers here think that failure to argue with them in scripture invalidates my logic that God does not exist.

This circular reasoning that America attacked Iraq because of WMD, and then claiming that failure to find them somehow validates that point is simply to ignorant an opinion to dispute. Failure to see the inherent contradiction is proof that reason is not something that will be grasped by these people.

[indierockboy]

so, if failure to find weapons of mass destruction does not invalidate the argument that they existed, what, pretell, would?

[GreatWyrm of Babylon]

You have as yet to demonstrat that the war was over WMD, giving money to suicide bombers families, supporting terrorists in general, giving visa's to terrorists, training terrorists, laundering money for terrorists, all played a part I am sure...

[Dislogic]

maybe but i think more of it had to do with George Bush's greed for personal wealth and the wealth of his family, friends, and collegues... not that there is anything wrong with that in general however there is something wrong with that when you send a nation to war for that reason when you are its representitive.

Also i do seem to recall that George Bush stated many times before the war that he was going to go to war because of WMD and that he did not believe that Suddam was telling the truth about this. That was his main arguement to go to war although i believe as i stated before that he had alterior motives for personal benifit. Besides like stated in an other thread somewhere... (forget which one) other countries are in the same and in some cases in more violation of what president bush seems to think is appropriate behavior for a nation other then the US but he is not going to war with them. I think we all know hes in it for the money, the facts just add up. i mean for instance, we have WMDs and whos to say considering president bushes outlandish behaviors in foriegn policy thus far he might not use WMDs to solve a problem that he is hell bent on having his way? And another thing... why is it ok for us to have WMDs and not others who is to judged us? us? that just doesent make sense because we will always side with ourselves on that one.

oh and i think i had something else to say that supported my poiint but i forgot it so i will post it later when i remember it.

[The Fyrdman]

Or perhaps it could be to do with 'Project for the New American Century' now running the administration, as Cheney, Rummy, Wolf, Perle (out supposedly but I do wonder) and Bush's brother all being founding members. As this group explicitly states its goal is for the USA to gain full spectrum military dominance of the world by 2020. Taking out the only military power in the middle east, besides Israel, is a big step towards this.

[fedfem]

I was just going to post that. G. Adams. Good point and the real reason.