![]() |
|
| The Debate Forums | Blogs | | | Donate | Register (it's free) | Chatroom | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||||
|
| | Thread Tools |
| | #1 (permalink) (top) |
![]() Throbbing Member Location: Old Europe Posts: 6,690 | I found there were a lot better reasons for invading Afghanistan than Iraq, if, that is, there were some sort of follow-through. But that operation also stands as a screw-up by Bush and his team (including Condi "We-don't-do-nation-building" Rice). Warlordism is rampant, the Taliban resurgent, and opium production way up. As for the "liberated" people, here's a little update. "I wish I was as cocksure of anything as Tom Macaulay is of everything." -- Viscount Melbourne |
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) (top) |
| Igneous Magma Posts: 353 | on afghanistan who have had their votes now what style of voting was it, the american first past the post style or the british style with preferential voting? Australian Parliamentary Simulator Aussies: Welcome to the Rudd Regime Yanks: Welcome to Hell Now Purgatory. Others: G'day mate. |
| | |