Volconvo is a debate forum for the discussion of political, religious, and news-based topics.

Charlatan · Nov 10, 2009, 05:56 pm

New jihad code threatens al Qaeda - CNN.com

Now this code is very precise and took two years to create, but still targets men, in fact focuses on men. It is a good idea to protect all the other people, but in fact it would be better to have no Jihad at all wouldn't it? Four hundered and seventeen pages must be devoted to the reasons behind their exclusion of those parties, but what about the men? Granted if it didn;t target men there would be no Jihad left, or, if there was no Jihad there would be no danger towards men at all. Either is beneficial, so I will try to prove that they are both better that way.

Why have a Jihad? To fight in the name of God is wrong, as if God wanted us to fight He would have put up monuments towards war. If Allah wants people to hate in His name He is empowering one over another, making life hard for one under the other. If these wars were bloodless then they would be more pleasing to a moral God, as if they were instead political rallies or something, then it would be even beneficial to the people that it is supposed to portect. Wars are fought to protect people, not to vanquish an enemy, so, if you need to fight to live, but you can live without fighting, and by fighting you jeaopardise the well being of the other community, where is the love in fighting?

If you have land stolen from you, land is replaceable, life is not. To strike someone because they have 'stolen' your home, but you find yourself not homeless, then there is no problem. If you were to see your countrymen left homeless offer them a home, do not fight the system where there will be war. The system, in Isreal for example, is that the land was bought, not stolen. If anyone is to blame then it is the state that sold the land, not the people that move in. If a landlord sends you off your home, do you blame the landlord or do yuo blame the new tenants? In all fairness you should blame the money that changed hands, but you cannot blame that, so the landlord is to blame, and they are the state.

If Al queda wants to strike out at a community building societal body like the US, and then bomb their own market places to show their power over the people, they must be bad, replacing all avenues with war in the place of reason and community building, as war is supposed to protect people remember. Where is the toxic stinging tail venom fangs of the west? There is no threat! They come in and create jobs and places for things to get exported to, therby bringing food to the tables of the people they are bombing. If they are an enemy of America then they are an enemy of their own people. If their own state is fighting them then that must tell you something - it is not like they are the only people that want a better life, but where sometry to build other destroy claiming that Allah is endorsing them and the people should back them.

Let's speak about it like this; if all the people were militants who would grow the crops? Who would tend the markets? If all of them were to go to war with the west what would it accomplish? They would kill a lot of innocent people and have a poorer state to live in, less food on the table.

These people get food on their tables at the expense of the people, while they prevent others getting food into their mouths. I may be concentrating on food, but if it were not for the hard working people trying their hardest to make do, like they should be doing, these 'militants', then there would be nothing. It is easy to pick up a gun and start shooting all over the place under false pretenses, but these people have no place on earth, they should do something else or at least have their weapons taken away.

So why have Jihads? If land is stolen look on the bright side and try to help those you claim to care about. I see people protesting to this, but I do not see people donating a single currency for them each, which would help loads. Why have a Jihad against another country for your people when they are not threatened? Jihads no doubt are there to protect people. How does a Jihad make Allah happy? I can't see someone shooting another and saying, "Hey, Allah, this one's for you!" I really don't think that would go down well with Him.

Love, cerish, build and share should be the new Jihad code. Doing the opposite is not required - there is no enemey to protect against.

Nov 10, 2009, 05:56 pm	#1 (permalink)
Charlatan Amateur stripper Location: Cape Town South Africa Posts: 1,574 Blog Entries: 5	New jihad code threatens al Qaeda New jihad code threatens al Qaeda - CNN.com Now this code is very precise and took two years to create, but still targets men, in fact focuses on men. It is a good idea to protect all the other people, but in fact it would be better to have no Jihad at all wouldn't it? Four hundered and seventeen pages must be devoted to the reasons behind their exclusion of those parties, but what about the men? Granted if it didn;t target men there would be no Jihad left, or, if there was no Jihad there would be no danger towards men at all. Either is beneficial, so I will try to prove that they are both better that way. Why have a Jihad? To fight in the name of God is wrong, as if God wanted us to fight He would have put up monuments towards war. If Allah wants people to hate in His name He is empowering one over another, making life hard for one under the other. If these wars were bloodless then they would be more pleasing to a moral God, as if they were instead political rallies or something, then it would be even beneficial to the people that it is supposed to portect. Wars are fought to protect people, not to vanquish an enemy, so, if you need to fight to live, but you can live without fighting, and by fighting you jeaopardise the well being of the other community, where is the love in fighting? If you have land stolen from you, land is replaceable, life is not. To strike someone because they have 'stolen' your home, but you find yourself not homeless, then there is no problem. If you were to see your countrymen left homeless offer them a home, do not fight the system where there will be war. The system, in Isreal for example, is that the land was bought, not stolen. If anyone is to blame then it is the state that sold the land, not the people that move in. If a landlord sends you off your home, do you blame the landlord or do yuo blame the new tenants? In all fairness you should blame the money that changed hands, but you cannot blame that, so the landlord is to blame, and they are the state. If Al queda wants to strike out at a community building societal body like the US, and then bomb their own market places to show their power over the people, they must be bad, replacing all avenues with war in the place of reason and community building, as war is supposed to protect people remember. Where is the toxic stinging tail venom fangs of the west? There is no threat! They come in and create jobs and places for things to get exported to, therby bringing food to the tables of the people they are bombing. If they are an enemy of America then they are an enemy of their own people. If their own state is fighting them then that must tell you something - it is not like they are the only people that want a better life, but where sometry to build other destroy claiming that Allah is endorsing them and the people should back them. Let's speak about it like this; if all the people were militants who would grow the crops? Who would tend the markets? If all of them were to go to war with the west what would it accomplish? They would kill a lot of innocent people and have a poorer state to live in, less food on the table. These people get food on their tables at the expense of the people, while they prevent others getting food into their mouths. I may be concentrating on food, but if it were not for the hard working people trying their hardest to make do, like they should be doing, these 'militants', then there would be nothing. It is easy to pick up a gun and start shooting all over the place under false pretenses, but these people have no place on earth, they should do something else or at least have their weapons taken away. So why have Jihads? If land is stolen look on the bright side and try to help those you claim to care about. I see people protesting to this, but I do not see people donating a single currency for them each, which would help loads. Why have a Jihad against another country for your people when they are not threatened? Jihads no doubt are there to protect people. How does a Jihad make Allah happy? I can't see someone shooting another and saying, "Hey, Allah, this one's for you!" I really don't think that would go down well with Him. Love, cerish, build and share should be the new Jihad code. Doing the opposite is not required - there is no enemey to protect against. Going to my destruction!