![]() |
|
| The Debate Forums | Blogs | | | Donate | Register (it's free) | Chatroom | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||||
![]() |
| | Thread Tools |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Amateur stripper | Palestinians blast Clinton for Israel praise Palestinians blast Clinton for Israel praise - CNN.com They all wan to settle down, and as soon as this settlement story is resolved they will be making progress. What needs to be done, as land is supposed to be inherited, as legally binding in a will of course, they cannot simply go in there and steal land from people that live there. That is a bad move indeed. If they were to buy the houses from the people then smash them down, no problem. If they were to build new houses - far cheaper than buying those houses - elsewhere in the country then that would also be a good idea. The problem here is emotion, that the Palestinians get emotional about their land. This is incredible, they should not be dependant on historty when it comes to making money - you can't eat history. This means they should sell their land to the Isrealis and then move, no problem I can see. If Palestine says that they take offence, what are they offended about? The world was open until people started placing fances all over the place, and if they were to forget their roots - which lead to problems - they would be better off. Is this some sort of gangbanging zone? Are they going to stand around marking houses with spray paint and becoming like a territorial animal? That is signs of ignorance, not reason. The logic comes in where there is good land with bad houses. Thier compensation would let them get a good house in the city, surely? Maybe it is a beautiful area, but that is nothing legally inciting at all. If you were to take this to court the judge would surely ask whether it will harm them, and if not, then tough luck. There is nothing wrong with being relocated in this way and I hope that all relevant parties agree with me. As a means to peace this clears up a lot. It makes money for a start, and brings minorites into touch with the rest of the country, joining with them of course. It is harmful to have clans of people livnig together and rejecting the rest of the country, there is no rejection in the cities is there? This is of course also not illegal, but nither is breaking up a community of certain people. So the outposts will dissapear and complaints will cease, there will be money for all, and the Palestinians won;t have to worry about their people being treated as a rejected community any more. This seems all pretty cut and dried to me, kill three problems with a bit of reason. Going to my destruction! |
| | |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Socialist | Yes, he's backtracked on US policy against the "natural growth" of the illegal settlements. http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2.../socialism.jpg Political Compass Position: Economic Left/Right:-9.50 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian:-7.13 |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| |