Volconvo is a debate forum for the discussion of political, religious, and news-based topics.

PatrickHenry · Apr 16, 2004, 04:19 am

<blockquote>Quote:<hr size="1" />Originally Posted by (Suburbanite,)
InfoWars? Is this the real Alex Jones?<hr size="1" /></blockquote>
Get real. Alex is having hot dogs and cold beer, not sharpening his debating skills. I was just mining the forums. Alex's video "911: Road to Tyranny" seriously pushed me over the edge a couple years ago, though. I've never been the same since.

And Gian, "Infowars" started the thread, "cobain" is el profane-o.

Suburbanite · Apr 16, 2004, 05:24 am

I love to read conspiracy websites.

glenn_w_l · Apr 16, 2004, 09:03 am

<blockquote>Quote:<hr size="1" />Originally Posted by (Infowars,)

<blockquote>Quote:<hr size="1" />Originally Posted by
WASHINGTON (AP) — In what the government describes as a bizarre coincidence, one U.S. intelligence agency was planning an exercise last Sept. 11 in which an errant aircraft would crash into one of its buildings. But the cause wasn't terrorism — it was to be a simulated accident.
<hr size="1" /></blockquote>

Ah yes a bizarre coincidence I really believe that, HONEST

OK why would the CIA do something so transparently obvious?
Because maybe that was the only way to make NORAD stand down on the morning of 911 to allow the hijacked airliners to fly for a long time without being intercepted.
<hr size="1" /></blockquote>

Norad had there own way of making themselves 'stand down':
On 9/11, NORAD was in the middle of another periodic war game, this one called Vigilant Guardian. Details are vague, except that the scenario tested "an imaginary crisis to North American Air Defence outposts nationwide" [Newhouse News, 1/25/02], and according to one NORAD employee, "everybody" at NORAD initially thought the real hijackings were part of the exercise. [Aviation Week and Space Technology, 6/3/02, Newhouse News, 1/25/02, ABC News, 9/11/02]

This was how the executive disabled the multi-trillion dollar defence system.
The 'simulations' caused the defence forces to think the 'hijacked planes' were part of a simulated exercise. No doubt, they immediately ordered (simulated) fighters to intercept the 'hijackers'. By the time anyone realised what was really happening, the structurally unsound and economically embarrassing twin towers had been demolished.
Kissinger and Rockefeller think they’re clever, but I think they must both be becoming senile.

Apr 16, 2004, 02:07 pm

<blockquote>Quote:<hr size="1" />Originally Posted by (PatrickHenry,)
<blockquote>Quote:<hr size="1" />Originally Posted by (Suburbanite,)
InfoWars? Is this the real Alex Jones?<hr size="1" /></blockquote>
And Gian, "Infowars" started the thread, "cobain" is el profane-o.<hr size="1" /></blockquote>

Yeah read my post. I made two statements there. Infowars doesn't have too much brain power, and cobain's language was over the line.

dotcoma · Apr 16, 2004, 02:14 pm

PatrickHenry · Apr 17, 2004, 09:37 pm

<blockquote>Quote:<hr size="1" />Originally Posted by (roxdog,)
User Posted Image<hr size="1" /></blockquote>
WTF?

dotcoma · Apr 18, 2004, 12:02 pm

Just wanted to see how people reacted to it. If someone told you that without you seeing it in the front page of the news, what would you think? If the front page told you in 20 years that people/agents/moles within the US infustructure...had a hand in 9/11, would you believe it? How would you react?

PatrickHenry · Apr 18, 2004, 09:45 pm

I am afraid the official story has quite a head start, no matter how ridiculous...

Apr 16, 2004, 04:19 am	#41 (permalink) (top)
PatrickHenry 9/11: Inside Job Location: Hawai'i, Big Island Posts: 10,438	</span><blockquote><span class="smallfont">Quote:</span><hr size="1" />Originally Posted by (Suburbanite,) InfoWars? Is this the real Alex Jones?<hr size="1" /></blockquote><span class='postcolor'> Get real. Alex is having hot dogs and cold beer, not sharpening his debating skills. I was just mining the forums. Alex's video "911: Road to Tyranny" seriously pushed me over the edge a couple years ago, though. I've never been the same since. And Gian, "Infowars" started the thread, "cobain" is el profane-o. "Arms in the hands of the citizens may be used at individual discretion for the defense of the country, the overthrow of tyranny or private self-defense." -- John Adams

Apr 16, 2004, 09:03 am	#43 (permalink) (top)
glenn_w_l Molten Ash Location: 34.25 S 150.54 E Posts: 39	</span><blockquote><span class="smallfont">Quote:</span><hr size="1" />Originally Posted by (Infowars,) </span><blockquote><span class="smallfont">Quote:</span><hr size="1" />Originally Posted by WASHINGTON (AP) — In what the government describes as a bizarre coincidence, one U.S. intelligence agency was planning an exercise last Sept. 11 in which an errant aircraft would crash into one of its buildings. But the cause wasn't terrorism — it was to be a simulated accident. <hr size="1" /></blockquote><span class='postcolor'> Ah yes a bizarre coincidence I really believe that, HONEST OK why would the CIA do something so transparently obvious? Because maybe that was the only way to make NORAD stand down on the morning of 911 to allow the hijacked airliners to fly for a long time without being intercepted. <hr size="1" /></blockquote><span class='postcolor'> Norad had there own way of making themselves 'stand down': On 9/11, NORAD was in the middle of another periodic war game, this one called Vigilant Guardian. Details are vague, except that the scenario tested "an imaginary crisis to North American Air Defence outposts nationwide" [Newhouse News, 1/25/02], and according to one NORAD employee, "everybody" at NORAD initially thought the real hijackings were part of the exercise. [Aviation Week and Space Technology, 6/3/02, Newhouse News, 1/25/02, ABC News, 9/11/02] This was how the executive disabled the multi-trillion dollar defence system. The 'simulations' caused the defence forces to think the 'hijacked planes' were part of a simulated exercise. No doubt, they immediately ordered (simulated) fighters to intercept the 'hijackers'. By the time anyone realised what was really happening, the structurally unsound and economically embarrassing twin towers had been demolished. Kissinger and Rockefeller think they’re clever, but I think they must both be becoming senile.

Apr 16, 2004, 02:07 pm	#44 (permalink) (top)
Giancarlo Guest Posts: n/a	</span><blockquote><span class="smallfont">Quote:</span><hr size="1" />Originally Posted by (PatrickHenry,) </span><blockquote><span class="smallfont">Quote:</span><hr size="1" />Originally Posted by (Suburbanite,) InfoWars? Is this the real Alex Jones?<hr size="1" /></blockquote><span class='postcolor'> And Gian, "Infowars" started the thread, "cobain" is el profane-o.<hr size="1" /></blockquote><span class='postcolor'> Yeah read my post. I made two statements there. Infowars doesn't have too much brain power, and cobain's language was over the line.

Apr 17, 2004, 09:37 pm	#46 (permalink) (top)
PatrickHenry 9/11: Inside Job Location: Hawai'i, Big Island Posts: 10,438	</span><blockquote><span class="smallfont">Quote:</span><hr size="1" />Originally Posted by (roxdog,) User Posted Image<hr size="1" /></blockquote><span class='postcolor'> WTF? "Arms in the hands of the citizens may be used at individual discretion for the defense of the country, the overthrow of tyranny or private self-defense." -- John Adams

Apr 18, 2004, 09:45 pm	#48 (permalink) (top)
PatrickHenry 9/11: Inside Job Location: Hawai'i, Big Island Posts: 10,438	I am afraid the official story has quite a head start, no matter how ridiculous... "Arms in the hands of the citizens may be used at individual discretion for the defense of the country, the overthrow of tyranny or private self-defense." -- John Adams

Apr 16, 2004, 05:24 am	#42 (permalink) (top)
Suburbanite BANNED Location: Los Angeles Posts: 3,203	I love to read conspiracy websites.

Apr 16, 2004, 02:14 pm	#45 (permalink) (top)
dotcoma Volcanic Erupter Posts: 3,154

Apr 18, 2004, 12:02 pm	#47 (permalink) (top)
dotcoma Volcanic Erupter Posts: 3,154	Just wanted to see how people reacted to it. If someone told you that without you seeing it in the front page of the news, what would you think? If the front page told you in 20 years that people/agents/moles within the US infustructure...had a hand in 9/11, would you believe it? How would you react?