Palin insists Abortion Doctor Killer not terrorist

[isaone]

This is just plain ridiculous, what a lying idiot. Ayers is a terrorist but not Paul Hill. People who are this mentally deficient(dishonest) and warped (and I mean Palin) should be prohibited from holding any public office by law !

[Jack]

Interesting comments on this video. Perhaps not everyone buys into that rhetoric after all.

[isaone]

Actualy Jack I agree, I am overall impressed with the American pubic whie still being disgusted at very large segments of it like these idiots at a Palin rally.

Overall however the negative attacks and lies from the Republicans have not worked. The younger people in particular seem to get it and a change seems to be in the air .

[famousde]

Well, I think it might be better to vote into office one that is confused about the term "terrorist," than voting in one whom IS a terrorist.

What is your point? Those criminals that killed abortion doctors are not Palin. Palin doesn't murder abortion doctors. How does the criminal actions of these anti-abortion freaks, excuse the bombing and killing done by another individual? Typical illogical and underhanded tactic of the left - the video in question- as well as the OP, engage in.

[Jack]

Well, I think it might be better to vote into office one that is confused about the term "terrorist," than voting in one whom IS a terrorist.

I agree. And better yet to vote for someone who not only isn't a terrorist but does understand what the term means.

[isaone]

famousde, Huh ??? I say Huh ???

Did you actually read my post ? Here I will speak slowly so you can follow.

My .. point .... is .... that .....certainly ..... beyond .... any ..... doubt .... the ....actions .... of ..... each ...... are ......... those ...... of ..... terrorists. Anyone ....... who ..... is ...... not ...... a...... moron...... or ....... a .......lying .........dumbass...... must ...... agree...... on ......that .

Palin of course did not agree. You may choose which of the above options apply .

Quote by: famousde than voting in one whom IS a terrorist.

Do you say these things because your are an idiot or are you just not paying attention to what you are typing ?

We can argue over the exact nature of Obama's relationship with a person who was a terrorist 40 years ago but no one above the age of 4 or IQ of 50 actually thinks Obama himself has committed terroistic acts. Please apologize for making a statement so stupid that my cat leaped out my window because he did not want to even read the words.

[another day]

At least Ayers never killed anybody. Personally, Ayers is somewhat of a hero of mine. Anybody who risks himself so much and takes such strong direct action is worthy of praise, not criticism. They managed to evacuate all buildings they bombed and I'm sure they put a huge dent in the vietnam war support.

The other guy is just an executioner.

[gallo]

Quote by: famousde Well, I think it might be better to vote into office one ]b][who][/b]is confused about the term "terrorist," than voting in one who[m] IS a terrorist.

If there were a terrorist running, that would be true. But there aren't any terrorists running. Instead we have dishonest hysterics screaming about what they don't understand.

What is your point? Those criminals that killed abortion doctors are not Palin.

No, but those criminals who killed abortion doctors were terrorists and Palin supports their terristic acts.

Palin doesn't murder abortion doctors.

But she apporved of it.

How does the criminal actions of these anti-abortion freaks, excuse the bombing and killing done by another individual?

It doesn't. However, Ayers didn't kill anyone. The people that Palin supports did.

Typical illogical and underhanded tactic of the left

And your implication that Obama is a terrorist isn't illogical and underhanded?