![]() |
|
| The Debate Forums | Blogs | | | Donate | Register (it's free) | Chatroom | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||||
![]() |
| | Thread Tools |
| | #63 (permalink) | |
| Throbbing Member Location: Old Europe
Posts: 10,011
| Quote:
"I wish I was as cocksure of anything as Tom Macaulay is of everything." -- Viscount Melbourne | |
| | |
| | #64 (permalink) |
| BANNED
Posts: 4,976
| No sure if he is an idiot, but whoever gave him advice on his world tour is a GENIUS He crowds of people around the world faling into Obammania is going to do a lot from him in the eyes of many Americans who do not like the degeneration of American's name that occurred under the Bush administration. |
| | |
| | #65 (permalink) | |
| Hot Lava
Posts: 2,368
| Quote:
His claim to fame is probably his action to end the struggle between the Orange and Green crowds in Ireland. His Bosnia efforts, which he promised would last only a year are still in place. His bombing of that place killed innocents and no enemy, least none that we know of. His actions, that he promised against the terrorists after they bombed the USS Cole never came to pass. None of his actions against the terrorists ever came to pass, except for a few Tomahawk missiles shot from far away, that did nothing. It was during Clinton's tenure in office that Ben Laden was able to plan his attacks upon the WTC. It was under Clinton that the FBI and the CIA were required to not share information. It was under Bill Clinton that BJ's became table talk. He lowered us to that level. He was, in my humble opinion, a scumbag. He was also a poor president. | |
| | |
| | #66 (permalink) | |
| weary pragmatist Location: Canada
Posts: 659
| Quote:
I don't have any use for him, myself, but this blaming him for 9/11 which you imply has got to stop. It wasn't his fault and is wasn't Bush's fault either. What, exactly, do you think Clinton could have done to prevent Bin Laden from planning an attack? Blowjobs only became table talk under Clinton because he was persecuted for getting one. All that proves is there are a lot of hysterical prudes in America. You can't blame Clinton for that. Be that as it may, I can't stand him. He showed his true colors when he played the race card against Obama. He's as ruthless and unprincipled as they come. | |
| | |
| | #68 (permalink) | ||
| Liberated thinker Location: New Mexican Alps
Posts: 2,465
| Quote:
Here is a good one? Quote:
I repeat his Swift Boat fellow sailors told the world that he was liar. He even communed with the enemy while still in a naval reserve status late in the war.Is this treason? Nor did he ever release access to his records as he promised. Thus I suspect there was some blot on his record that caused his Silver Star to have to be re issued much later when he had been elected to Congress and could exert influence on the Secreatary of the Navy?? His true military record is murky and I feel may have been corrected through the Board for the Correction of Naval Records. Obviously these accusations are mine and I don't have the inclination or time to follow up on them. Can you prove they are illogical or wrong? Thus we play the fools with the time, and the spirits of the wise sit in the clouds and mock us. | ||
| | |
| | #69 (permalink) | ||
| Liberated thinker Location: New Mexican Alps
Posts: 2,465
| Pay attention oades. Quote:
I didn't think Iraq was such a direct threat and I didn't think Clintons bombing foreign countries was kosher either? Is that avoidance of your war justification question, or is it you just don't understand? My statement was self explanatory, or at least I thought it would suffice for a normaly informed person. If you still don't understand, Google it! Quote:
Thus we play the fools with the time, and the spirits of the wise sit in the clouds and mock us. | ||
| | |
| | #70 (permalink) | |
| Hot Lava
Posts: 2,368
| Quote:
Of course, Clinton was not responsble for 9/11; Ben Laden and his cronies were. But the fact is Ben Laden and his boys did find security condition here lax enough for them to plan and train for their mission. Was Clinton response for that laxness? Maybe...at least to some degree. Concerning the Clinton economy; it boomed, and then bombed. Clinton's administration didn't do much to cause the good times however. (They did enact some advantageous tax wrinkles w/t investment). Rather it was the Dot Com bubble that injected huge amounts of capital into our system that gave us prosperity. That bubble also burst which sent us into an economic tailspin which caused 401K's to lose money in the last year of Clinton's administration. Then 9/11 hit and this added to the crashing stock market drove us even deeper into recession. This recession happened, of course during the early Bush administration. His tax cuts helped to soften and eventually end that down turn, which lead to relative boom again. Then came a Democrat congress and the oil crisis and we are headed down again...if Obama wins and the tax cuts are removed, the on coming recession will be long, deep and hard felt. Ahhhh...what were we supposed to be talking about anyway? | |
| | |
| | #71 (permalink) |
| Liberated thinker Location: New Mexican Alps
Posts: 2,465
| You can talk all you want to deadeye. You make sense. I lost many thousands of investmment dollars in the economic recession that occurred towards the end of Clintons term. The recession that he and Gore vehementally denied. I too noticed the Enron and other Dot Com scandals that the Dems made so much of occurred during the Clinton administration. Though Bush was blamed because they were revealed by his administration? I also noticed the whopping draw down of our Military (near 1/3) that resulted frome the Clinton/Gore re-invention of government years? A reductuion in defensive capability in the midst of mounting terrorist attacks? Great guy Clinton? Quite farshighted and attentive to his executive role. Thus we play the fools with the time, and the spirits of the wise sit in the clouds and mock us. |
| | |
| | #72 (permalink) | |
| Hot Lava
Posts: 2,368
| Quote:
I actually saw him. I could not speak with him, or shake his hand. He doesn't allow himself to be spoken to or approached by the meer masses. He was stumping for his wife......(I think they are married, but I'm not sure they are "together".) Clinton is a huge man. He stands about 6'4" and he has a head as big as a 55 gallon barrel. His hair is a glowing white and his skin is bright pink. He paces about the stage as he speaks. He looks down at his hands as he caresses the hand held micophone. He drones on and on, mostly talking about himself...and how wonderful he was a president, and how much he enjoyed the job, and the fame and the acclaim. He is, in short, a self centered jerk, thinking of little else than himself. Historians will treat his presidency with a hoe hum. They will treat Bush's as an attempt at true American Greatness. I read today that the "surge" just might be one of the most successful military strategies in the history of American warefare. Bill Clinton will be, and is know, for "I didn't have sex with that women". | |
| | |
| | #75 (permalink) | |
| Throbbing Member Location: Old Europe
Posts: 10,011
| Quote:
I asked you whether you have a credible source to substantiate them. If not, I'll be obliged to view your claims -- like those of the Flat Earth Society -- as garbage. "I wish I was as cocksure of anything as Tom Macaulay is of everything." -- Viscount Melbourne | |
| | |
| | #76 (permalink) | |
| Guest
Posts: n/a
| Quote:
As for the "surge", its alleged success is more hype than reality. See A Social History of the Surge. I think you'll agree that the notion that the surge is a success is, in fact, a misrepresentation of the facts on the ground. | |
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| |