Register (it's free)
Volconvo Debate Forums
Advertise Here »
Browse ad-free by donating
The Debate Forums Blogs | Donate Register (it's free) Chatroom Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read  
  Volconvo / Debate Forums / Politics & Government


This topic in Politics & Government is about Should unlocking and re-selling a prepaid phone be a jailable offense?.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Jul 13, 2008, 09:17 pm   #1 (permalink)
kharvel
Greed is Good™
 
kharvel's Avatar
 
Location: Seattle
Posts: 151
Should unlocking and re-selling a prepaid phone be a jailable offense?

Cell phone companies scramble to halt trafficking - Yahoo! News
Quote:
Cell phone companies scramble to halt trafficking
By CURT ANDERSON, AP Legal Affairs WriterSun Jul 13, 3:22 PM ET

For less than $15, you can buy a cell phone loaded with minutes. You can buy more as you go whenever those minutes run out. Best of all, you aren't locked into a long-term contract.

But in South Florida, New York, California, Georgia, Texas and elsewhere, traffickers have figured out they can make big profits by purchasing thousands of these low-cost phones and tweaking the software so that calls can be made on any cell network. The altered phones are then sold all over the world — costing the phone companies tens of millions of dollars.

Some traffickers employ dozens of people full-time as "runners" to buy the phones at retail stores so they can later be hacked into and resold. The problem for the phone companies is that they often sell the phones at a loss, instead making their money when customers have to buy additional minutes from them — a guaranteed profit once the phone is sold. But the phone companies have no guarantee that customers will buy minutes from them after the phones are hacked or shipped to a far-off country.

It's technically not illegal to unlock the software on your personal cell phone — but the companies are hoping to put a stop to traffickers that they say are siphoning away profits. Led by Miami-based TracFone Wireless Inc., makers of the low-cost prepaid cell phones are suing traffickers in federal courts around the country. One such lawsuit resulted in a criminal conviction in Houston when a man disobeyed a court order by refusing to stop selling the phones.

"There is a lot of profit in it," said James Baldinger, a West Palm Beach attorney with the Carlton Fields firm who represents TracFone. "Even as we continue to shut people down, we do find there are people still engaged in it. TracFone is going to keep going after them."

These phones are typically sold by traffickers for between $40 and $60 above the discounted TracFone price — and they are frequently marketed in lots of 10,000 or more. Web sites catering to these dealers boast about having huge numbers of unlocked cell phones.

TracFone has filed 39 lawsuits in recent months — more than half of them in South Florida — seeking to stop companies and individuals from trafficking in its phones. Similar lawsuits have been filed by AT&T, Nokia Corp., Virgin Mobile USA Inc. and Motorola Inc.

TracFone and the others argue that federal laws protect their trademarks and copyrighted software. They say the phones must be used with minutes bought from the company that sold the phones. TracFone and other companies lose customers — and therefore profits — when people buy minutes from other cell phone companies.

Not everyone involved believes it is wrong. A company called Incomtel that bills itself as "cellular suppliers to the world" was among those recently sued by TracFone. Its lawyers argued in court that it's perfectly legal to buy phones from stores such as Wal-Mart, CVS and Target and modify them to work on any cell phone system.

The company contended in court documents that because the phones made by firms such as Motorola and Nokia are purchased on the open market and are repackaged for resale, Incomtel is under no obligations to TracFone.

"If the phone is a Motorola phone, it is operated by Motorola software," the company said. "The fact that TracFone, on its phones, may lock the code and making some minor branding modifications does not render the Motorola or Nokia software a property of TracFone."

So far, TracFone and the other companies have been winning more than losing. Tracfone has obtained more than 15 court orders halting the unlocking and resale of its phones, and has been awarded more than $4 million in damages.

One man could be headed to prison in the first case nationally of its kind.

Muhammed Mubashir, 27, pleaded guilty in May to criminal contempt charges for disobeying a federal judge's order in Houston that he stop trafficking in Virgin Mobile phones. A separate order against Mubashir involved the seizure in 2007 of 1,300 TracFones he was sending to Hong Kong. It was later learned that he sold at least 9,000 TracFones in this way.

It's up to a federal judge to decide if Mubashir should do prison time, but it's clear that TracFone wants an example set. Sentencing is set for Aug. 22.
Hints: First Sale Doctrine, DMCA, trademarks.


Kharvel's First Law: Greed is Good™

Kharvel's Second Law: If it is good for the goose, it must always be good for the gander.
kharvel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 13, 2008, 10:26 pm   #2 (permalink)
Jack
Inquisitor
 
Jack's Avatar
 
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 17,904
Blog Entries: 71
Send a message via ICQ to Jack
It appears the guy might go to jail for contempt, not for his activities with the phones. This sounds like a "theft of services" case. Not that I'm very sympathetic with the telcos.



The Forum Rules

Radical Atheist
Jeber's
If we're all God's children, what's so special about Jesus?
Jack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 14, 2008, 12:11 am   #3 (permalink)
ThoughtCriminal
Hot Lava
 
Posts: 1,372
Quote:
Quote by: Jack View Post
It appears the guy might go to jail for contempt, not for his activities with the phones. This sounds like a "theft of services" case. Not that I'm very sympathetic with the telcos.
Notice the hints. First, there's the DMCA, which tries to enforce stupid business models at gunpoint. Then there's the first sale doctrine, which is what lets me give away or sell my books. One of the things that these stupid business models always seem to depend on is that you can't transfer any license you purchase, forcing people to pay again and again for what they already own.

TC
ThoughtCriminal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 14, 2008, 04:17 am   #4 (permalink)
another day
slipping sand
 
another day's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,002
Good. Phone companies make their money, and BIG money, by selling the phones super cheap. Then they lock you into a 3 year plan worth thousands of dollars. Should people be so stupid as to fall for it? No. I don't. It is enslavement, just like a credit card. I have never and will never run up a debt of any kind, mortgage, credit, phone bill, anything I do not have to. But if people are SMART enough to get around it? F*** the phone companies. They have been screwing people for a long time. Time to screw them. I suspect no one on their side will be starving anytime soon. Maybe they won't be able to chop down their nightly dish of caviar with a silver spoon. Wah wah wah.

And yes, I understand the possible effects on employees. It's there job to fix the problem.


Look out kid, they keep it all hid.
another day is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2008, 01:32 am   #5 (permalink)
jose
Volcanic Burper
 
Location: España
Posts: 2,836
If a store has on offer, a product, lets say frozen pizza @ 50 cents as a ¨loss leader¨ something they make a loss on to get you into the store, and you then sold the frozen pizza to other people for a profit would that be a crime? NO
(it would be up to the store to decide how many you can buy)

If on the other hand a Judge orders you not to do something, and you carry on doing it jail time is in order
jose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2008, 01:41 am   #6 (permalink)
kharvel
Greed is Good™
 
kharvel's Avatar
 
Location: Seattle
Posts: 151
Quote:
Quote by: jose View Post
If a store has on offer, a product, lets say frozen pizza @ 50 cents as a ¨loss leader¨ something they make a loss on to get you into the store, and you then sold the frozen pizza to other people for a profit would that be a crime? NO
(it would be up to the store to decide how many you can buy)

If on the other hand a Judge orders you not to do something, and you carry on doing it jail time is in order
Yeah, but in this case, the Judge was ordering the guy to do something that was perfectly legal and that was probably giving him a living.


Kharvel's First Law: Greed is Good™

Kharvel's Second Law: If it is good for the goose, it must always be good for the gander.
kharvel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2008, 07:48 am   #7 (permalink)
Kamehameha34
BANNED
 
Posts: 4,817
Send a message via AIM to Kamehameha34
It wouldn't be against the law to buy thousands of prepaid phones simply without buying minutes for them - useless, but not illegal. This has the same effect.
Kamehameha34 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:08 pm.

Sponsors (become a sponsor)
Coach Purses, Conference Calling, Laser Hair Removal Offices, Beauty Supplies, Gambling Online, xango, Miele Vacuums, Plus Size Bras, liquid vitamins, weight loss, Smiley Central, Monetise your website, Vacuum-Direct.com, Hydroponics & Grow Lights, Offshore banking, beauty salons, Retail Electric Providers Cirro Energy, LasVegas Vacations, homes in hudson, Affordable Web Hosting, Security Audit, Guy Factor, Gun Forums
Credit Counseling - Renegade Motorhomes - Debt Consolidation - Phoenix Landscaping
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.2 Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0

© 2003–12/21/2012 Jason Siegel

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10