![]() |
|
| The Debate Forums | Blogs | | | Donate | Register (it's free) | Chatroom | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||||
|
| | Thread Tools |
| | #1 (permalink) (top) | |
| The dingos! Posts: 4,459 | US Tax Code I'm replying to an off-topic post of Helio's in the Phil&Relig forum. Didn't think I should further derail the thread. Quote:
You have to admit there's at least an inconsistency in the constitution after the 16th amendment (which, fyi, was enacted to cover the costs of the civil was - which I believe is over)... "Your life, liberty, and property are yours and you have sole individual rights to them all.. Oh, except for about half of that last one, we can take that whenever we want." | |
| | |
| | #2 (permalink) (top) | |
| Molten Ash Posts: 140 | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #8 (permalink) (top) | |
| blasphemer Location: Michigan Posts: 7,973 | Quote:
Grandpa h. Do unto others as you would have them do unto you (unless it costs something). | |
| | |
| | #10 (permalink) (top) |
| blasphemer Location: Michigan Posts: 7,973 | Many are not understanding the function of money. It is both a legal and extralegal thing, much like the government itself. So the question needn't be "does such and such a law" exist. It could actually be about some very basic principles. In this case, it could be whether the federal reserve and taxation are absolutely necessary. No one needs a law to ask such simple questions, yet basic critical thinking is typically seen as an ultimate crime. Grandpa h. Do unto others as you would have them do unto you (unless it costs something). |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| |