Register (it's free)
Volconvo Debate Forums
Advertise Here »
Browse ad-free by donating
The Debate Forums Blogs | Donate Register (it's free) Chatroom Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read  
  Volconvo / Debate Forums / Politics & Government


This topic in Politics & Government is about Should the US boycott the Olympic opening ceremonies?.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Apr 14, 2008, 08:48 am   #1 (permalink) (top)
prejudged_Fire
Hmmmm.......
 
prejudged_Fire's Avatar
 
Location: Auburn, Maine
Posts: 809
Should the US boycott the Olympic opening ceremonies?

We're discussing this in World Issues class right now. Here's a blog I found on it:
Quote:
Interesting debate on NPR between a human rights activist and an official of the International Olympic Committee about whether U.S. government officials, and perhaps even athletes, should boycott the opening ceremony of the Beijing Olympic games this August.

Listen to it HERE.

Human rights attorney David Kilgour, a former Canadian member of parliament, originally had supported a complete boycott because of China's abysmal record on human rights. But now he feels that the games are bringing greater scrutiny to that record -- in Tibet, Darfur, with the Falun Gong and more generally -- so he's instead calling for a boycott of the opening ceremony by government officials.

Now is the time to exert some pressure, he says.

Former U.S. rower and IOC member Anita DeFrantz — who missed the 1980 Moscow games after then-President Jimmy Carter pulled out the U.S. to protest the USSR invasion of Afghanistan — says such a boycott wouldn't work.

It got heated. The IOC "doesn't have a single scruple when it comes to totalitarian governments," Kilgour said.

What do you think?
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpu...-the-us-b.html

While I don't support China's actions towards Tibet, I don't think the Olympics should be mixed with politics, and I don't think it should be used as a means to show political support for a particular country/region/government.
What do you think?


"I'd rather spend my life close to the birds than waste it wishing I had wings."
-- Patient from House MD
prejudged_Fire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 14, 2008, 09:48 am   #2 (permalink) (top)
Matt W
Moderator
 
Matt W's Avatar
 
Location: Reading, UK.
Posts: 6,759
This is a blog, an op-ed spot, not Breaking News. Moving.


I spent a lot of money on booze, birds and fast cars. The rest I just squandered.

-George Best, on being asked what he did with his footballing fortunes.
Matt W is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 14, 2008, 10:10 am   #3 (permalink) (top)
nomad-town
Sedimentary Rock
 
Posts: 2
Quote:
Quote by: prejudged_Fire View Post
We're discussing this in World Issues class right now. Here's a blog I found on it:

Political Punch

While I don't support China's actions towards Tibet, I don't think the Olympics should be mixed with politics, and I don't think it should be used as a means to show political support for a particular country/region/government.
What do you think?
I agree with your view. Olympics shoud not be used to show pressure to one government,and support one political group.
nomad-town is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 14, 2008, 11:11 am   #4 (permalink) (top)
Anmon
BANNED
 
Location: between the good and the bad
Posts: 1,330
All politics should be left out of sport, it should be a neutral zone like it was intended.
Anmon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 14, 2008, 11:35 am   #5 (permalink) (top)
grandpa
blasphemer
 
grandpa's Avatar
 
Location: Michigan
Posts: 7,936
Quote:
Quote by: Anmon View Post
All politics should be left out of sport, it should
be a neutral zone like it was intended.
That's how life should be, not just the Olympics. However, the olympics are little other than nationalist showboating. It therefore makes little sense to think it immune from nationalist politics.

Grandpa h.


Do unto others as you would have them do unto you (unless it costs
something).
grandpa is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 14, 2008, 12:05 pm   #6 (permalink) (top)
Technosoul
Volcanic Erupter
 
Posts: 8,663
I think this is more a boycott of Bush for attending the games rather then a real boycott of the Oylimpics. It is about bashing Bush for not making a statement about the tibet situation.

Hey, is anyone upset because we did not allow all the protesters a chance to protest the Oylimpic Torch run here in the USA? When we went out of our way to subdue that protest which was also targeting China?

And we did it in the captial of the protester movemment. S.F.
Technosoul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 14, 2008, 08:15 pm   #7 (permalink) (top)
Gods_Mercenary
Altruism Assassin
 
Gods_Mercenary's Avatar
 
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 5,286
I'd remind everyone that the running of the Olympic torch was started by Adolf Hitler, as was much of the showing off, so lets not delude ourselves as to the nobility of the ceremonies.


“Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.”
-Albert Einstein
Gods_Mercenary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 15, 2008, 04:24 pm   #8 (permalink) (top)
WearetheWorld
Sedimentary Rock
 
Posts: 11
China can do whatever they want as long as they aren't bothering me or bombing me, the US aren't the world police, and the Olympics shouldnt be a place to make a political stand.
WearetheWorld is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 15, 2008, 06:28 pm   #9 (permalink) (top)
Gods_Mercenary
Altruism Assassin
 
Gods_Mercenary's Avatar
 
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 5,286
The U.S. isn't being particularly nosy about this issue, for reasons I stated above, but there's minding your own business and taking part in a Red China propoganda lovefest while women and bhuddist monks get beat up in the street.


“Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.”
-Albert Einstein
Gods_Mercenary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 15, 2008, 08:25 pm   #10 (permalink) (top)
grandpa
blasphemer
 
grandpa's Avatar
 
Location: Michigan
Posts: 7,936
Quote:
Quote by: Gods_Mercenary View Post
The U.S. isn't being particularly nosy about this issue, for
reasons I stated above, but there's minding your own business
and taking part in a Red China propoganda lovefest while
women and bhuddist monks get beat up in the street.
True, and the Olympics are as good a place as any to highlight the
right of self-determination, a hallmark of reasonable society. The question is: Which is more important, a bunch of silly games or having human rights? Like many issues, concerns over rights abuses are not intrinsic to everyone's understanding, so such concerns should be publicized.

Grandpa h.


Do unto others as you would have them do unto you (unless it costs
something).
grandpa is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 16, 2008, 09:24 am   #11 (permalink) (top)
Anmon
BANNED
 
Location: between the good and the bad
Posts: 1,330
So who wants to take bets on some athlete who wins a gold medal, will unfurl a banner hidden in his tracksuit, raise it over his head on live TV that reads 'Free Tibet' ?
This will then put said athlete into the halls of protester fame up along with the guys doing the Black Panther salute at the Mexico Olympics in 68.
Not to mention all the money offers after the games(if he or she makes it out of China that is) from popular chat shows world wide and magazines focusing on 'take us through that moment why just did you do that?
Athlete thinks about 100,000 dollar cheque deposited in account to come on Oprah briefly..
Anmon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 16, 2008, 09:52 am   #12 (permalink) (top)
grandpa
blasphemer
 
grandpa's Avatar
 
Location: Michigan
Posts: 7,936
Quote:
Quote by: Anmon View Post
So who wants to take bets on some athlete who
wins a gold medal, will unfurl a banner hidden in
his tracksuit, raise it over his head on live TV
that reads 'Free Tibet'?
This will then put said athlete into the halls of
protester fame up along with the guys doing the Black
Panther salute at the Mexico Olympics in 68.
It could happen. It'd be just as likely for an athlete to come out in solidarity with the world's poor.
In China, "Free Tibet or Free Taiwan" are fighting words.

Grandpa h.


Do unto others as you would have them do unto you (unless it costs
something).
grandpa is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 16, 2008, 12:38 pm   #13 (permalink) (top)
Anmon
BANNED
 
Location: between the good and the bad
Posts: 1,330
It will happen, care for a friendly bet?

Last edited by Anmon; Apr 16, 2008 at 04:06 pm.
Anmon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 16, 2008, 01:34 pm   #14 (permalink) (top)
Fangrim
Hot Lava
 
Fangrim's Avatar
 
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 927
Regardless of whether China's current policies are favorable or unfavorable, it's China's issue and prerogative, not America's.

Though we may have our own views on the issue, we shouldn't place any coercion or urge for any action. China needs to deal with this on its own; given that the favorable option would be to free Tibet, China needs to come to that realization and implement it, not the United States.

No, we need not boycott any part of the Olympics.
Fangrim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 17, 2008, 07:40 am   #15 (permalink) (top)
Trotsky
Stront vir breins
 
Trotsky's Avatar
 
Location: Buckinghamshire, UK
Posts: 540
Quote:
Quote by: nomad-town View Post
I agree with your view. Olympics shoud not be used to show pressure to one government,and support one political group.
Why was it acceptable to throw South Africa out of international sport during the Apartheid era?

And before you say anything, I'm of the opinion that was the correct decision?


" UKIP -- the United Kingdom Independence Party, the golf club version of the BNP, British National Party.
"
Middle East.. "The vile leading the stupid to kill the decent in the name of the holy."
Trotsky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 17, 2008, 07:41 am   #16 (permalink) (top)
Anmon
BANNED
 
Location: between the good and the bad
Posts: 1,330
China is too important economically to throw out of anything.
They can do whatever they want.
Anmon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 17, 2008, 07:47 am   #17 (permalink) (top)
Trotsky
Stront vir breins
 
Trotsky's Avatar
 
Location: Buckinghamshire, UK
Posts: 540
Fair enough, an honest answer, not something that you get very often.


" UKIP -- the United Kingdom Independence Party, the golf club version of the BNP, British National Party.
"
Middle East.. "The vile leading the stupid to kill the decent in the name of the holy."
Trotsky is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:05 am.

Sponsors (become a sponsor)
Online Gambling, KFUPM ePrints, Double Glazing UK, Free Online Games, xango, UK Car Insurance, Beauty Salon, Beauty Salons, Coach Handbags, Miele Vacuums, Plus Size Bras, Horses for Sale, Ventrilo Server, liquid vitamins, weight loss, Smiley Central, Monetise your website, Ventrilo Server, Dyson Vacuums, Hydroponics & Grow Lights, Offshore banking, beauty salons, Offshore banking, Connecticut Electric Rate, Retail Electric Providers Cirro Energy, LasVegas Vacations, Web Design, homes in hudson, Affordable Web Hosting, Texas Electric Rate Cirro Energy, Security Audit, Guy Factor, Gun Forums, MPAA CreditCards Mortgage Calculator eHarmony Promotional Code Bad Credit Loan
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.7.3 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0

© 2003–2008 Volconvo.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10