![]() |
|
| The Debate Forums | Blogs | | | Donate | Register (it's free) | Chatroom | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||||
|
| | Thread Tools |
| | #1 (permalink) (top) |
| Volcanic Erupter Posts: 8,663 | Stripper poles show it all - they support Ron Paul. Ha! But true. here are the u-tube top 10 stores including one on P.P. and one from MoveOn, and other investigative reports from the snoopers. YouTube - TOP 10: Transvestites for Larry Craig & Strippers 4 Ron Paul More stemulating news about canidates and current news events. Monitors - it used 'poles' instead of the word "polls" in title on purpose. |
| | |
| | #2 (permalink) (top) |
| Principled Observer Location: Toledo, Ohio Posts: 13,873 | Another great thread by Techno. (sarcasm) What percentage of the voting population is strippers or transvestites Techno? What percentage of strippers and transvestites vote Techno? What bearing does this have on national, or for that matter, state politics Techno? What is your debate in this thread Techno? Petition of Redress of Grievances: http://www.givemeliberty.org/default.htm Canadian Lawsuit Against Their National Banks: http://www.freewebs.com/classaction/ Osborn F. Enready |
| | |
| | #3 (permalink) (top) |
![]() BANNED Location: Ohio Province, Rep. of Comerica Posts: 7,320 | Besides, where is the surprise in a story that informs us about how informed working people, the tax base, prefer a candidate that doesn't want all thier money. Talk about a no brainer. I don't like to catch fire either. Is that news? |
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) (top) | |
| Volcanic Erupter Posts: 8,663 | Quote:
DaytonDailyNews: Dayton, Ohio, news and information This poll does not provide absolutes for the nation in total, but it does show that half of the men were interested enough to attend those performances by strippers. That would suggest ( in my estimation ) that at about 75 % of half the male population would support a cannadate that supports that occupation's rights. Of course most people often do not vote for a canadate based on one minor issue, but some do, and they all can add up. What the one transvestite has to do with that Congressman charged with immorality is beyond me... I could not seperate or isolate any one topic from the 10 shown. Sometimes I make a post and allow viewers to select what to debate about the topic presented, rather then personally directing the direction for which the debate should unfold, on the assumption they can think for their self without being told what to do. But now I will do that at your suggestion. 1. I would suggest a debate about how much 'silly stuff' and comedy can influence an election. 2. Which also brings up the topic of a 'well informed voter population' and what effect that has. If this is the kind of information that u-tube viewers are getting then I would debate that such is hampering the election such that we might not get the best person elected based on such foolishness, compared to u-tube people getting more 'realistic' information based on the actural topics of importance. As that group could become an important 'voting block'. Not positive whom that voting block now supports in their majority. Or what effect such information has in directing to support a particular canidate. As that would be "the debate' advocated here. | |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| |