Volconvo is a debate forum for the discussion of political, religious, and news-based topics.

GHook93 · Jul 31, 2007, 04:41 pm

When asked if he would speak, without preconditions, to countries that are hostile to America, such as: Iran (Alamdouchebag), Syria (Assad-Hole), NK (Little Kim), Cuba (Castro) or Venezuela (Chavez), he said YES!!!

I applaud him for this! What does not talking do? It creates further isolation, further tension and increases the chances for armed conflicts. Can dialog lead to nothing? YES, but with talks the chances are still a hell of a lot better something positive will happen.

What was the robot's Clinton's response,"No, I wouldn't want to be used as propaganda." What propaganda could dialog or discussion have? Why would talking be a bad thing?

Honestly I could careless about Obama experience. In all retrospect Bush was the experience choice and look were the fuck-nut has lead us. The President is going to come out of the Democratic party, even if you are going to vote Republican in the generals, please vote against the useless Clinton on the primaries.

another day · Jul 31, 2007, 08:37 pm

anyone who says obama is a bad choice because he is inexperienced is completely lost.

experience in politics is nothing more then experience in deceit, propaganda, and manipulation.

shawmutt · Jul 31, 2007, 08:43 pm

Unfortunately it's not the answer Joe USA wants to hear. We want to maintain our f 'em all mentality while remaining ignorant of real world events.

In other words, if we can't bomb 'em, f 'em.

GHook93 · Jul 31, 2007, 09:28 pm

Quote:

Quote by: another day

anyone who says obama is a bad choice because he is inexperienced is completely lost.

experience in politics is nothing more then experience in deceit, propaganda, and manipulation.

BS, experience means something in whatever you do. If someone falls to fraud, they will do it whether they are experience or not. Either way you lost the message, which is about speaking to hostile leaders.

Jul 31, 2007, 04:41 pm	#1 (permalink) (top)
GHook93 SUSPENDED Location: Chicago, IL Posts: 4,875	Obama's Youtube Foreign Policy Response - 2 thumbs UP When asked if he would speak, without preconditions, to countries that are hostile to America, such as: Iran (Alamdouchebag), Syria (Assad-Hole), NK (Little Kim), Cuba (Castro) or Venezuela (Chavez), he said YES!!! I applaud him for this! What does not talking do? It creates further isolation, further tension and increases the chances for armed conflicts. Can dialog lead to nothing? YES, but with talks the chances are still a hell of a lot better something positive will happen. What was the robot's Clinton's response,"No, I wouldn't want to be used as propaganda." What propaganda could dialog or discussion have? Why would talking be a bad thing? Honestly I could careless about Obama experience. In all retrospect Bush was the experience choice and look were the fuck-nut has lead us. The President is going to come out of the Democratic party, even if you are going to vote Republican in the generals, please vote against the useless Clinton on the primaries.

Jul 31, 2007, 08:43 pm	#3 (permalink) (top)
shawmutt Slightly Dangerous Location: Greencastle, PA Posts: 1,334	Unfortunately it's not the answer Joe USA wants to hear. We want to maintain our f 'em all mentality while remaining ignorant of real world events. In other words, if we can't bomb 'em, f 'em. I don't believe in polls, and 62% of Americans agree with me ~Steven Colbert

Jul 31, 2007, 08:37 pm	#2 (permalink) (top)
another day slipping sand Posts: 1,996	anyone who says obama is a bad choice because he is inexperienced is completely lost. experience in politics is nothing more then experience in deceit, propaganda, and manipulation.