User Tag List

View Poll Results: Does illegal immigration produce a positive or negative net value for the US?

Voters
41. You may not vote
  • Positive

    15 36.59%
  • Negative

    26 63.41%
Page 3 of 33 FirstFirst 123456713 ... LastLast
Results 25 to 36 of 386

Thread: Illegal Immigration: a fact-based cost/benefit analysis

  1. #25
    Hot Lava fushigi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Plainsboro, NJ
    Posts
    2,416
    Threads
    139
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Quote by: Century 25 View Post
    Then too.. the entire argument is illogical.. like saying Al Capone helped the economy.. he generated $100 million/year for himself alone..
    Wrong. He was a criminal. He acquired his money through criminal activities. Not all illegals are criminals. The overwhelming majority work in legal industries.


  2. #26
    Volcanic Erupter
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    7,949
    Threads
    133
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Quote by: fushigi View Post
    There are many laws on the books that go unenforced because they're either inapplicable to the current situation ........
    Gee, how exactly do you enforce a law when it's inapplicable??

    I upped my income, up yours.

  3. #27
    Hot Lava fushigi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Plainsboro, NJ
    Posts
    2,416
    Threads
    139
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    You don't. That's why it's not enforced. There's no need to enforce a law for something that doesn't ever occur.


  4. #28
    Volcanic Erupter tinybear's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    9,017
    Threads
    449
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Quote by: fushigi View Post
    Wrong. He was a criminal. He acquired his money through criminal activities. Not all illegals are criminals. The overwhelming majority work in legal industries.
    An illegal immigrant is, by definition, a criminal.


  5. #29
    Volcanic Erupter tinybear's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    9,017
    Threads
    449
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Quote by: Duke1985 View Post
    If the statement that failing to enforce one section of the undermines the entire rule of law, then our lack of enforcement of sodomy laws does the same thing.
    Its rare you hear someone clamoring for the enforcement of sodomy laws because they fear we're undermining the rule of law by not enforcing it.
    It's not only the lack of enforcement of the law. It's also the blatant flouting of the law and the highly publicized neglect in the enforcement of the law which undermines the rule of law.

    Show me one other country in the world which houses nearly 20 million illegal immigrants.


  6. #30
    Hot Lava fushigi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Plainsboro, NJ
    Posts
    2,416
    Threads
    139
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Quote by: tinybear View Post
    An illegal immigrant is, by definition, a criminal.
    Again, derailing the thread. Either prove that non-enforcement of illegal immigration laws is "undermining the rule of law" (as you said) to a significant degree AS TO OUTWEIGH THE OTHER BENEFITS of illegal immigration or take it to a different thread.


  7. #31
    Hot Lava fushigi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Plainsboro, NJ
    Posts
    2,416
    Threads
    139
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Quote by: tinybear View Post
    It's not only the lack of enforcement of the law. It's also the blatant flouting of the law and the highly publicized neglect in the enforcement of the law which undermines the rule of law.
    Can you please tell me, how do you measure the "undermining of the rule of law"?

    Please give me a metric, a way to evaluate that. A way you could test your theory.

    If you were really serious about your argument, you'd do that yourself without me having to ask you.


  8. #32
    Iceberg
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    5,792
    Threads
    24
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Sorry for the double post See below.

    Brien the Iceberg

    If you tell the truth you don't have to remember anything. M.T.

  9. #33
    Iceberg
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    5,792
    Threads
    24
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    But does not enforcing one section of the law - on illegal immigration - really mean undermining the ENTIRE rule of law?
    Absoulutely. Otherwise, why have the rule of law? Selective enforcement of the law leads discrimination and can be considered the first step toward anarchy.


    trust police chiefs where sanctuary laws are being enforced to decide for their constituencies what's best for them

    This is simply ludicrous. Think about the ramifications of this statement. First, the police are not charged with interpreting the law, they are charged with law enforcement. What if a police chief wakes up today and decides he isn't going to enforce traffic laws, or drug laws, or robbery and larceny laws? Or freedom of speech laws, or 1st, 2nd, or 4th Amendment laws? Where does it end?

    Brien the Iceberg

    If you tell the truth you don't have to remember anything. M.T.

  10. #34
    Volcanic Erupter tinybear's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    9,017
    Threads
    449
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Quote by: fushigi View Post
    Again, derailing the thread. Either prove that non-enforcement of illegal immigration laws is "undermining the rule of law" (as you said) to a significant degree AS TO OUTWEIGH THE OTHER BENEFITS of illegal immigration or take it to a different thread.
    One indication of the rule of law being undermined is people beginning to take the law into their own hands because they see that the government isn't enforcing it.

    Does the word 'minutemen' ring a bell?

    Such 'vigilantism' is bound to lead to chaos and anarchy once it spreads.


  11. #35
    Hot Lava Century 25's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Southwest desert - Valley of the Sun
    Posts
    1,750
    Threads
    26
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Quote by: fushigi View Post
    Wrong. He was a criminal. He acquired his money through criminal activities. Not all illegals are criminals. The overwhelming majority work in legal industries.
    Illegal: Unlawful; illegitimate; illicit; unlicensed. Illegal, unlawful, illegitimate, illicit, criminal can all describe actions not in accord with law.

    The favored term of the illegal alien activist/advocate is "undocumented immigrant" - quite a euphemism..

    What part of illegal alien is not criminal..? To enter this (or any other) country without permission.. is in itself.. illegal.. a crime.. Did you enter Beijing without proper authorization.. I think not.. China would not be amused by the euphemism "undocumented" lol.. or try to get an "undocumented" bank loan...

    Thus.. an illegal alien is committing a crime against all of us in America.. and makes folly of the blood sweat & tears of all who came here by the book.. worked hard and attained citizenship legally..

    That is a fact.. and I still need the monetary data on jobs.. careers.. lost due to the illegal aliens overrunning our country.. uninvited.. illegal..


  12. #36
    Hot Lava fushigi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Plainsboro, NJ
    Posts
    2,416
    Threads
    139
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Quote by: brien View Post
    First, the police are not charged with interpreting the law, they are charged with law enforcement. What if a police chief wakes up today and decides he isn't going to enforce traffic laws, or drug laws, or robbery and larceny laws? Or freedom of speech laws, or 1st, 2nd, or 4th Amendment laws? Where does it end?
    Slippery slope.

    The police chiefs aren't making the laws - the city officials are.

    They consider the advice of LEO when making laws. In that sense, they have some input into the lawmaking process, but don't control it.

    It's about triage - responding to and enforcing the worst crimes first. LEO simply don't have the time to give a full response to every crime that's committed. So yes, they have to prioritize.

    But no, they don't make the laws.


Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •