![]() |
|
| The Debate Forums | Blogs | | | Donate | Register (it's free) | Chatroom | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||||
|
| | Thread Tools |
| | #21 (permalink) (top) | |||
![]() Aristotle Location: Chicago, IL Posts: 4,298 | Quote:
In other words they favor anarchy! Quote:
Quote:
| |||
| | |
| | #22 (permalink) (top) | ||
| Principled Observer Location: Toledo, Ohio Posts: 13,873 | Quote:
LOL.... you are either tragically misinformed, or have a very twisted filter of perception. Get in touch with the facts: Official Website of the Libertarian National Committee Quote:
As soon as I have the opprotunity to view it, I will post back my opinion of the event. As a sidenote, if one bad appearance sank a canidate, how would Bush have EVER been elected? Petition of Redress of Grievances: http://www.givemeliberty.org/default.htm Canadian Lawsuit Against Their National Banks: http://www.freewebs.com/classaction/ Osborn F. Enready | ||
| | |
| | #23 (permalink) (top) | |
| Iceberg Location: Connecticut Posts: 5,691 | Quote:
You see, it is more convenient for people to create their own perceived LP ideology the way the want it, so when it comes to arguing their points, it fits within their mistaken and self created ideas, rather than the truth. It is rather like debating with oneself. ![]() Brien the Iceberg If you tell the truth you don't have to remember anything. M.T. | |
| | |
| | #24 (permalink) (top) |
| pregnant with truth Posts: 2,244 | Why is it that Ron Paul couldn't raise a substantial amount of money from americans? He hasn't really tried. Votes are money if you have enough of them. I understand about the electoral college. or is it electoral collage? given the scenerio in the OP, it could be pulled off. I can see it and I'm sure others can. Vicchios summary just illuminates the glaring problems with us and the system. I haven't seen any reason to be discouraged or spend too much time answering to the strongly opposed. They have thier reasons. They will find dirt if it's there. That is their only positive function at this point. fingers crossed. The Decider's arguements could be a good way to bring Jimmy Carter on board. No doubt changes need to be made but may not be necessary immediately if enough people can believe in the candidate. Was not aware of Pauls position on this. I need to think about it I guess. If no one was opposed to carter's endorsement, there could be an open bi-partisan coalition like is talked about but never really amounts to anything meaningful. The 'terrorists'(whoever they are) will consider us weak because of the confusion created by shifting regimes(?) in our gov't. Paul would need a plan to deal with immenent reprisal for his success. no biggie. Maybe there's more allies out there. I'll bet. There's no reason he can't be a republican. Last edited by Clarence; Apr 18, 2007 at 03:39 pm. |
| | |
| | #25 (permalink) (top) | |
| Libertarian Location: Colorado Springs, CO Posts: 1,609 | Quote:
Unless a reform proposal can be forced upon the government from the outside there will be no way that any meaningful change will take place. Keith The great thread killer. | |
| | |
| | #26 (permalink) (top) | |
| Principled Observer Location: Toledo, Ohio Posts: 13,873 | Quote:
I can't believe the rest of the public isn't demanding this already. The two party-charade is wearing thin, and I think the longer the D&R's bungle this years goals, and fail to impeach Bushista and his henchman, the more and more people are waking up to what a scham this has been with 157 years of bi-partisan domination of politics. Petition of Redress of Grievances: http://www.givemeliberty.org/default.htm Canadian Lawsuit Against Their National Banks: http://www.freewebs.com/classaction/ Osborn F. Enready | |
| | |
| | #27 (permalink) (top) | |
| Iceberg Location: Connecticut Posts: 5,691 | Here is an edited chonological account of the success of the LP from 1984.: Official Website of the Libertarian National Committee Quote:
I think this is impressive growth considering the LP was only founded in 1971. Keep in mind, all of you skeptics, and you know who you are here, that the American Revolution really began before 1747 when the people of Boston rose up in "great anger" over the desertion of 50 British sailors from the HMS Lark whom were seeking a better life for themselves. Commodore Charles Knowles ordered a search along the Boston docks for these sailors, and upon failing to find them, impressed a number of colonists to replace them. This practice of impressment had been going in Boston since before 1741when colonists had beat and stoned a royal sheriff who supported impressment, and in 1742, a crowd attacked the commanding officer of the Astrea while destroying a barge belonging to the Royal Navy, over the issue. So if one realizes it took 48 years, up to 1789, to actually set up a new government in Amercia, the LP progress seems to me, to be acceptable. Brien the Iceberg If you tell the truth you don't have to remember anything. M.T. | |
| | |
| | #28 (permalink) (top) | ||
| Igneous Magma Location: Southwest desert - Valley of the Sun Posts: 597 | Quote:
Quote:
| ||
| | |