| 121 Democrats vote against safety.
Quote:
Rep. Steve Pearce (R-N.M.), who'd offered an earlier bill to protect good Samaritans who alert officials, rose to speak after King. "If we allow these suits to go forward," he warned the House, "it will have a chilling effect on the future of American security . . . If we are serious about fighting terrorism, if we are serious about protecting Americans and asking them to help protect each other, then we must pass this motion."
This is the kind of no-brainer legislation that every member of Congress should vigorously support. Yet House Democrats reacted to King's proposal as if he'd thrown a bomb into the House chamber itself.
| LIBS: LAWSUITS 1ST, SAFETY 2ND By DEBRA BURLINGAME - Opedcolumnists - New York Post Online Edition
I think this entire article is a perfect example of why the Dems may be in bi trouble in '08 in the house and senate. American's understand how dangerous this idiot lawsuit by the 6 "flying Imam's" is and realize what the democrat party said by trying to fight the amendment put forth.
Einstein's "Theory of Relativity" is still being challenged to this day, but by consensus Global Warming is a fact... that's REAL science at work, why didn't Albert just go that route? | 
Apr 3, 2007, 01:15 pm
