Register (it's free)
Volconvo Debate Forums
Advertise Here »
Browse ad-free by donating
The Debate Forums Blogs | Donate Register (it's free) Chatroom Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read  
  Volconvo / Debate Forums / Politics & Government


This topic in Politics & Government is about Please rate Diamond Party.

Reply  
 
Thread Tools
Old May 4, 2004, 09:09 am   #1 (permalink) (top)
BHD
Sedimentary Rock
 
Posts: 13
With a few friends we've been setting up an open source political platform. The Diamond Party is a new independent voters league, dedicated to promoting liberty, justice and logic and calls for an active and positive stance towards politics. We believe in streamlined government, freer markets and effective justice. Our site features a comprehensive platform, political strategy, think tanks, FAQ and more…

Anyway, we're still looking for people to read and criticize our platform and principles. The more feedback we get the better. So please, rate our platform! Thanks.


Source:
Diamond Party
BHD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 4, 2004, 09:15 am   #2 (permalink) (top)
Gorgo
BANNED-Warned multiple times about instigating. User then reported topics multiple times to mess with staff.
 
Posts: 4,412
What is a free market?
Gorgo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 4, 2004, 09:18 am   #3 (permalink) (top)
BHD
Sedimentary Rock
 
Posts: 13
Quote:
Originally posted by Gorgo,
What is a free market?
A setting for exchanging resources where prizes and conditions are set as result of free (no coercion) interaction between buyers and sellers?
BHD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 4, 2004, 09:24 am   #4 (permalink) (top)
Gorgo
BANNED-Warned multiple times about instigating. User then reported topics multiple times to mess with staff.
 
Posts: 4,412
How is that achieved? Without government?
Gorgo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 4, 2004, 09:25 am   #5 (permalink) (top)
BHD
Sedimentary Rock
 
Posts: 13
Quote:
Originally posted by Gorgo,
How is that achieved? Without government?
No. With smaller but more effective government.
BHD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 4, 2004, 09:41 am   #6 (permalink) (top)
Gorgo
BANNED-Warned multiple times about instigating. User then reported topics multiple times to mess with staff.
 
Posts: 4,412
So, not free from coercion, but the minimum of coercion.

Smaller government, meaning greatly reducing the size of the "Defense" Department?
Gorgo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 4, 2004, 09:46 am   #7 (permalink) (top)
BHD
Sedimentary Rock
 
Posts: 13
Quote:
Originally posted by Gorgo,+--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Gorgo,)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>So, not free from coercion, but the minimum of coercion.
[/b]


Anarchy is not feasible. And we'll always need a govt to enforce our individual (economical) rights.

<!--QuoteBegin-Gorgo,


Smaller government, meaning greatly reducing the size of the "Defense" Department?
[/quote]

Reducing it to at least a minimum level of efficiency.
BHD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 4, 2004, 09:57 am   #8 (permalink) (top)
Gorgo
BANNED-Warned multiple times about instigating. User then reported topics multiple times to mess with staff.
 
Posts: 4,412
You want to eliminate tyrants. How would you eliminate tyrants?
Gorgo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 4, 2004, 10:01 am   #9 (permalink) (top)
BHD
Sedimentary Rock
 
Posts: 13
Quote:
Originally posted by Gorgo,
You want to eliminate tyrants. How would you eliminate tyrants?
By isolating them. By supporting pro-democracy movements in dictatorial countries all over the world. By taking military action if necessary (see Iraq).
BHD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 4, 2004, 10:03 am   #10 (permalink) (top)
Gorgo
BANNED-Warned multiple times about instigating. User then reported topics multiple times to mess with staff.
 
Posts: 4,412
Iraq was necessary?

I don't see anything about NAFTA or the IMF. What is the position on those things?
Gorgo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 4, 2004, 10:07 am   #11 (permalink) (top)
BHD
Sedimentary Rock
 
Posts: 13
Quote:
Originally posted by Gorgo,
Iraq was necessary?
Not entirely. We should have worked harder for a solution within the UN framework. Or at least we should have looked for more support from other 'willing' countries before going in quasi-alone.
BHD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 4, 2004, 10:08 am   #12 (permalink) (top)
BHD
Sedimentary Rock
 
Posts: 13
Quote:
Originally posted by Gorgo,

I don't see anything about NAFTA or the IMF. What is the position on those things?
We support both NAFTA and the IMF. We believe in free markets and global economy.
BHD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 4, 2004, 10:23 am   #13 (permalink) (top)
Gorgo
BANNED-Warned multiple times about instigating. User then reported topics multiple times to mess with staff.
 
Posts: 4,412
Thanks.
Gorgo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 4, 2004, 11:18 am   #14 (permalink) (top)
Gorgo
BANNED-Warned multiple times about instigating. User then reported topics multiple times to mess with staff.
 
Posts: 4,412
So, would you say that is a major cut, a minor cut, a medium cut?

Quote:
Originally posted by BHD,

Reducing it to at least a minimum level of efficiency.
Gorgo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 4, 2004, 11:25 am   #15 (permalink) (top)
dotcoma
Volcanic Erupter
 
Posts: 3,154
Quote:
Originally posted by BHD,+--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (BHD,)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteBegin-Gorgo,

I don't see anything about NAFTA or the IMF.  What is the position on those things?
We support both NAFTA and the IMF. We believe in free markets and global economy.[/b][/quote]

And you think that NAFTA and the IMF have anything to do with free markets? I think your party needs to reevaluate it's platform...
dotcoma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 4, 2004, 11:51 am   #16 (permalink) (top)
Gorgo
BANNED-Warned multiple times about instigating. User then reported topics multiple times to mess with staff.
 
Posts: 4,412
Well, the platform says they're "centrist," which has come to mean right wing. Especially since the extreme criminal right wing has come to mean Conservative.
Gorgo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 4, 2004, 12:11 pm   #17 (permalink) (top)
BHD
Sedimentary Rock
 
Posts: 13
Quote:
Originally posted by Gorgo,+--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Gorgo,)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>So, would you say that is a major cut, a minor cut, a medium cut?

<!--QuoteBegin-BHD,


Reducing it to at least a minimum level of efficiency.
[/b][/quote]


Well it's hard to name an exact figure, especially since some of our stances on the military would actually cost money (better pay, more benefits,...), but cutting operational costs by 20% should be possible.
BHD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 4, 2004, 12:12 pm   #18 (permalink) (top)
BHD
Sedimentary Rock
 
Posts: 13
Quote:
Originally posted by roxdog,+--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (roxdog,)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Quote:
Originally posted by BHD,@
<!--QuoteBegin-Gorgo,
Quote:


I don't see anything about NAFTA or the IMF.  What is the position on those things?


We support both NAFTA and the IMF. We believe in free markets and global economy.
And you think that NAFTA and the IMF have anything to do with free markets? I think your party needs to reevaluate it's platform...[/b][/quote]

You don't think NAFTA makes markets more free?
BHD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 4, 2004, 12:14 pm   #19 (permalink) (top)
dotcoma
Volcanic Erupter
 
Posts: 3,154
Quote:
Originally posted by BHD,+--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (BHD,)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Quote:
Originally posted by roxdog,+--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (roxdog,)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteBegin-BHD,@
<!--QuoteBegin-Gorgo,
Quote:


I don't see anything about NAFTA or the IMF.  What is the position on those things?


We support both NAFTA and the IMF. We believe in free markets and global economy.
And you think that NAFTA and the IMF have anything to do with free markets? I think your party needs to reevaluate it's platform...[/b][/quote]

You don't think NAFTA makes markets more free?[/b][/quote]
It has nothing to do with what I think...
dotcoma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 4, 2004, 12:14 pm   #20 (permalink) (top)
PatrickHenry
9/11: Inside Job
 
PatrickHenry's Avatar
 
Location: Hawai'i, Big Island
Posts: 10,438
Is this a joke?


"Arms in the hands of the citizens may be used at individual discretion for the defense of the country, the overthrow of tyranny or private self-defense." -- John Adams
PatrickHenry is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:01 pm.

Sponsors (become a sponsor)
Free Online Games, xango, UK Car Insurance, Beauty Salon, Coach Handbags, Miele Vacuums, Plus Size Bras, Gambling, Bullhorn, Horses for Sale, Ventrilo Server, liquid vitamins, weight loss, Smiley Central, Monetise your website, Ventrilo Server, Dyson Vacuums, Hydroponics & Grow Lights, Offshore banking, beauty salons, Offshore banking, Connecticut Electric Rate, Retail Electric Providers Cirro Energy, LasVegas Vacations, Web Design, homes in hudson, Affordable Web Hosting, Texas Electric Rate Cirro Energy, Security Audit, Guy Factor, Gun Forums, Song Lyrics Mortgages Mobile Phones Loans Hotel Las Vegas
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.7.1 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0

© 2003–2008 Volconvo.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9