Register (it's free)
Volconvo Debate Forums
Advertise Here »
Browse ad-free by donating
The Debate Forums Blogs | Donate Register (it's free) Chatroom Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read  
  Volconvo / Debate Forums / Politics & Government


This topic in Politics & Government is about Will Bushs Church be Indicted?.

View Poll Results: Will Bushs' Church be Indicted?
YES 0 0%
NO 8 100.00%
Voters: 8. You may not vote

Reply  
 
Thread Tools
Old Oct 2, 2006, 08:31 pm   #21 (permalink) (top)
Milton Bradley
BANNED
 
Location: Ohio Province, Rep. of Comerica
Posts: 7,320
Quote:
Quote by: Cephus View Post
It has nothing to do with honesty, it has to do with reality. Murder is, indeed, a legal term and has no meaning outside of that. Now if someone wants to call Bush a fool and a loser, that's fine and dandy by me, I'd agree. But when you start comparing Bush to Manson and calling him a murderer, that's different. Unfortunately, you get far too many people who are happy to play linguistic hopscotch rather than understand that words have meanings.

I didn't say "honest", I said" intellectually honest", because I assumed you knew the difference.
Milton Bradley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 5, 2006, 05:04 pm   #22 (permalink) (top)
gr8fuldaniel
Fire the Liars
 
gr8fuldaniel's Avatar
 
Location: California
Posts: 7,090
Quote:
Quote by: Cephus View Post
It has nothing to do with honesty, it has to do with reality. Murder is, indeed, a legal term and has no meaning outside of that. Now if someone wants to call Bush a fool and a loser, that's fine and dandy by me, I'd agree. But when you start comparing Bush to Manson and calling him a murderer, that's different. Unfortunately, you get far too many people who are happy to play linguistic hopscotch rather than understand that words have meanings.
I think you are playing hopscotch, with 12 year old scotch.

You mean to tell me; I can do anything, and if there is no trial, it didnt really happen?
gr8fuldaniel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 5, 2006, 06:38 pm   #23 (permalink) (top)
gr8fuldaniel
Fire the Liars
 
gr8fuldaniel's Avatar
 
Location: California
Posts: 7,090
Quote:
Quote by: Cephus
It has nothing to do with honesty, it has to do with reality.
I almost put this in The Most Idiotic Statements thread, but thought I ought to give you a chance to explain.
How can you have one without the other?
gr8fuldaniel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 5, 2006, 07:36 pm   #24 (permalink) (top)
Milton Bradley
BANNED
 
Location: Ohio Province, Rep. of Comerica
Posts: 7,320
Quote:
Quote by: Cephus
It has nothing to do with honesty, it has to do with reality.

Quote:
Quote by: gr8fuldaniel View Post
I almost put this in The Most Idiotic Statements thread, but thought I ought to give you a chance to explain.
How can you have one without the other?

I would guess he is talking about the "reality" the mainstream media puts fourth every day. You know, the one where they still honor, and defend the constitution, and everything is OK in the world. That reality. John, and Jane SIixpacks reality. Rush Limbaughs reality. John Kerrys reality. The two partys lock on power reality. That one.
Milton Bradley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 6, 2006, 05:39 pm   #25 (permalink) (top)
Cephus
Hot Lava
 
Location: Redlands, CA
Posts: 2,258
Quote:
Quote by: gr8fuldaniel View Post
You mean to tell me; I can do anything, and if there is no trial, it didnt really happen?
Strictly legally speaking, yes. The term 'murder' is a legal term, it has a legal meaning. You're trying to take a legal term and apply it to a non-legal situation, simply because you're going for an emotional reaction.

Sheesh, go do some research already.


Jesus loves me? No thanks, I don't swing that way.

Blog Me! http://BitchSpot.JadeDragonOnline.com
Cephus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 6, 2006, 09:24 pm   #26 (permalink) (top)
Milton Bradley
BANNED
 
Location: Ohio Province, Rep. of Comerica
Posts: 7,320
Quote:
Quote by: Cephus View Post
Strictly legally speaking, yes. The term 'murder' is a legal term, it has a legal meaning. You're trying to take a legal term and apply it to a non-legal situation, simply because you're going for an emotional reaction.

Sheesh, go do some research already.

Are you saying Bush isn't sending people out to do his murdering for him?


I think you are missing the "much bigger fish" analogy, and perhaps you need to watch this video to see the relevance. YouTube - Pirates and Emperors - Schoolhouse Rock
Milton Bradley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 7, 2006, 10:17 pm   #27 (permalink) (top)
Cephus
Hot Lava
 
Location: Redlands, CA
Posts: 2,258
Quote:
Quote by: Milton Bradley View Post
Are you saying Bush isn't sending people out to do his murdering for him?
Got legal evidence to support it? And besides, that might make him an accessory to murder, or guilty of contracting a murder, but if he isn't doing it himself, he can't actually BE a murderer.


Jesus loves me? No thanks, I don't swing that way.

Blog Me! http://BitchSpot.JadeDragonOnline.com
Cephus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 7, 2006, 11:47 pm   #28 (permalink) (top)
tivodan1116
Juris Doctor
 
tivodan1116's Avatar
 
Location: Brockport, NY
Posts: 2,127
Quote:
Quote by: Cephus View Post
Got legal evidence to support it? And besides, that might make him an accessory to murder, or guilty of contracting a murder, but if he isn't doing it himself, he can't actually BE a murderer.
Speaking of people who need to do some legal research...
McKinney's Penal Law s.125.27
Murder in the First Degree

A person is guilty of murder in the first degree when:

1. With intent to cause the death of another person, he causes the death of such person or of a third person; and
(a) Either
...
(vi) the defendant committed the killing or procured commission of the killing pursuant to an agreement with a person other than the intended victim to commit the same for the receipt, or in expectation of the receipt, of anything of pecuniary value from a party to the agreement or from a person other than the intended victim acting at the direction of a party to such agreement;
...
and
(b) The defendant was more than eighteen years old at the time of the commission of the crime.
"Guilty of contracting a murder" = Murderer.


Don't forget... Lawyers were writing the Constitution while doctors were still bleeding people with leeches...
tivodan1116 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:01 pm.

Sponsors (become a sponsor)
Free Online Games, xango, UK Car Insurance, Beauty Salon, Coach Handbags, Miele Vacuums, Plus Size Bras, Gambling, Bullhorn, Horses for Sale, Ventrilo Server, liquid vitamins, weight loss, Smiley Central, Monetise your website, Ventrilo Server, Dyson Vacuums, Hydroponics & Grow Lights, Offshore banking, beauty salons, Offshore banking, Connecticut Electric Rate, Retail Electric Providers Cirro Energy, LasVegas Vacations, Web Design, homes in hudson, Affordable Web Hosting, Texas Electric Rate Cirro Energy, Security Audit, Guy Factor, Gun Forums, Debt Consolidation Loans Xecuter 3 Mod Chip Cheap Loan Loans
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.7.1 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0

© 2003–2008 Volconvo.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9