| Advertise Here » Browse ad-free by donating | |
|
|
| The Debate Forums | Blogs | | | Donate | Register (it's free) | Chatroom | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||||
 |
| | Thread Tools |
Apr 29, 2004, 02:12 pm
| #1 (permalink) (top) |
| Navy Veteran  Location: Texas Posts: 6,031 | They met with the 9/11 committee. Bush sounded up beat. I found the questions of the reporters afterwards... expecially the one implying that Bush needed Cheney there to "keep his story striaght to be the most.. ignorant question. I wonder if this same reporter asked that of Clinton when he and his TWO aides met with the 9/11 commission. Did he ask Clinton if he needed Bruce Lindsey and Sandy Berger? That would be intersting to find out. http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2004/4/...28/112633.shtml Einstein's "Theory of Relativity" is still being challenged to this day, but by consensus Global Warming is a fact... that's REAL science at work, why didn't Albert just go that route? |
|  |
|
Apr 29, 2004, 02:32 pm
| #2 (permalink) (top) |
| Location: Finland Posts: 712 | "But wait. When ex-President Clinton testified before the Commission three weeks ago, he wasn't alone either." <---- from the article. Is this "newsmax" some "easy and biased news for children and the like" - thing? I don't know much about clinton, I don't care who's in what party etc etc - but cannot educated, thinking, adult people talk about politics without the "but you did that too!" - game? How can anything evolve if people keep this party vs party mentality? I seriously don't know if I'd be a democrat or a republican, was I American. I don't care. Who cares about Clinton? He's not in charge anymore, is he? Is America really this childish and divided on these things? Rantgear off. (EDIT: I was speaking in general, not that much at this exact issue) |
|
| |
|
Apr 29, 2004, 03:11 pm
| #3 (permalink) (top) |
| Playful  Location: Groningen, the Netherlands Posts: 805 | Paavo, I think it has to do with the fact that before an election both candidates and their parties are throwing so much dirt on each other that both sides become unbelievable at best. Another cognitive reaction could be to reject all evidence which doesn't fit your current believes. So once someone is a vivid republican or democrat, it becomes quite hard for that person to accept that the other side isn't all-"evil" and their side isn't all-"good". |
|
| |
|
Apr 29, 2004, 03:23 pm
| #4 (permalink) (top) |
| Location: Finland Posts: 712 | I know, I just think it's so pathetic somehow. It's like a "gang" where people who are sad because they've never "belonged" take part in to feel at home or something. I mean, nobody can seriously think that one party is all good and the other all bad. Not even a newborn kid is that naive. *leaves mumbling on about idiots*  |
|
| |
|
Apr 29, 2004, 07:15 pm
| #5 (permalink) (top) |
| Navy Veteran Location: Texas Posts: 6,031 | I just found that funny thats all. Bush, according to some in the media, a bumbling baffoon who needed the VP with him to talk to the commission. Clinton, considered widely, one of the most intelligent presidents... had to have two people with him.... the hypocracy and irony is just... too funny Einstein's "Theory of Relativity" is still being challenged to this day, but by consensus Global Warming is a fact... that's REAL science at work, why didn't Albert just go that route? |
|
| |
|
Apr 30, 2004, 03:52 pm
| #6 (permalink) (top) |
| Principled Observer  Location: Toledo, Ohio Posts: 13,873 | Ugh.... sad is more like it.... Petition of Redress of Grievances: http://www.givemeliberty.org/default.htm Canadian Lawsuit Against Their National Banks: http://www.freewebs.com/classaction/ Osborn F. Enready |
|
| |
