![]() |
|
| The Debate Forums | Blogs | | | Donate | Register (it's free) | Chatroom | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||||
|
| | Thread Tools |
| | #41 (permalink) (top) | |||
| Hot Lava Posts: 817 | Quote:
Quote:
And I made the comment that we are in a bear market for stocks because that's what it is. You can wait for another few months for all the pundits to put their stamp of approval on the "Bear" word, but they will only be doing so after the fact. They never get it right while it is actually happening. They only tell you what happened later. Oh... And more evidence of not only a slowdown but a rise in inflation. Can you say "stagflation?" Quote:
Upward revisions for each of the past three years! LOL. Makes ya wonder 'bout them gubmint statistics, huh? ;-) The stock market is having a good day so far this morning. Looks like people are expecting the economic slowdown to make the FR stop raising the federal funds rate. But what about that inflation? Bernanke is of the school that says you raise rates to stop inflation. We'll see how all this plays out between now and the elections. ~ zynner | |||
| | |
| | #42 (permalink) (top) |
| moderat-e/o-r Location: boston Posts: 11,184 | good to see that there's someone else here who frequents yahoo finance.. inflation seems almost entirely due to pass-through inflation on input prices (namely oil).. the other bit was that worker wages and benefits has seen a steep increase in recent weeks.. the latter should eventually stabilize as employers gain leverage over labor, and can dampen wages.. the former is out of the fed's hands - and i hope they realize that. but, stagflation has been on my mind for several years now (i used to post about it on another forum all the time before joining volconvo).. imo, the fed held rates too low for too long a time - and the government's inexcusable recklessness in spending is another big reason why we are where we are. |
| | |
| | #43 (permalink) (top) | |
| Pragmatist Location: UK London Posts: 1,979 | Quote:
I wouldn't recommend sex, drugs and insanity for everyone, but its always worked for me. Never think that war, no matter how necessary, nor how justified, is not a crime." (Ernest Hemingway) | |
| | |
| | #44 (permalink) (top) |
| Hot Lava Posts: 817 | Bernanke just got hit with the worst possible scenario on economic reports: inflation up but economy down. Damned if you do and damned if you don't. Also heard on the radio yesterday that foreclosures were up 67% last month (not sure if that was nationwide or a particular region). ~ zynner |
| | |
| | #45 (permalink) (top) |
| moderat-e/o-r Location: boston Posts: 11,184 | and to add insult to injury, this investigation over stock options is a minor enron in the making.. apple, for example, is going to take it hard in the ass tomorrow.. http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/060803/apple...ons.html?.v=11 my state was the one with that foreclosure figure... of course, it should also be noted that foreclosures have been increasing across the board since 2004.. i've been doing a lot of fundamental analysis on certain tech companies.. companies like intel have been decimated by the market for purely emotional reasons... the company's cash flows are all supremely strong, profits continuously grow, etc.. in questionable times like this, it's a good bet to go with companies with solid fundamentals. speculative investing is best done during times of decreasing interest rates imo.. i've been closing out certain positions i was long in over the past 2 weeks. got out of energy, which is way overvalued.. i'm still long in gold and india though. those are more long-term investments though, so i'm not so concerned about any volatility they experience over the next decade or so. |
| | |
| | #46 (permalink) (top) |
| Hot Lava Posts: 817 | Seems most people think the Fed will not raise rates this time around, I will go out on a bit of a limb and say they will raise 0.25%, but will attempt to calm the markets with a change in their accompanying statement that indicates they think they are done. (They're not.) Other central banks have just raised their rates. If the FR does not, the USD tanks. Plus, the recent jobs report was weak in terms of job growth, but incomes were up 0.4% for the month (almost a 5% annual rate). That's why I think Bernanke will want to raise (12 members get to vote, but he heads the parade) -- but they will have to issue a neutralizing statement with it to keep the US stock market from tanking. Of course, the best of all worlds would be to abolish the Federal Reserve once and for all. If we do get an economic disaster coming, I hope people will see the FR and Alan Greenspan for what they are: leeches. ~ zynner |
| | |
| | #47 (permalink) (top) |
| Pragmatist Location: UK London Posts: 1,979 | I am as close to certain as I get they will not raise rates, it would basically be economic suicide at this point. You have a housing market that has cooled already and you are beginning to see the flow on effects in terms of low job creation. If Bernanke raises rates again you can pretty much say goodbye to the housing market and a lot of people in that industry which accounts for a good deal of your jobs in the nation. The USD is going to tank, its just a matter of when more than anything else. Its possible that in the near future there is going to be a HUGE amount of money to be made when the dollar really starts to lose stability although that may well not happen for a few years yet but its definitely being factored into long term estimates by a lot of banks that are slowly diversifying out of the dollar now and trying to give it a soft landing so as not to destabilise the world economy. I wouldn't recommend sex, drugs and insanity for everyone, but its always worked for me. Never think that war, no matter how necessary, nor how justified, is not a crime." (Ernest Hemingway) |
| | |
| | #48 (permalink) (top) | ||
| Hot Lava Posts: 817 | Quote:
Quote:
Consider this scenario: The Fed does NOT raise, the US dollar weakens, foreigners sell US treasuries (not tomorrow, but over several months or years) and that drives longer-term rates UP. That, in turn, drives fixed mortgage rates up, which kills off the housing market DESPITE NO FED RAISES. Interesting, huh? See the Fed dilema? The one thing they might try that few are talking about is monitizing the debt. Basically, they would give all outward appearances of fighting recession by not raising rates, but then buy up stocks, bonds, and US dollar if they tank. This would be done behind the scenes, secretly. Some people suggest that this is the very reason they stopped publishing M3, the broadest measure of the Money Supply. They could only do this by inflating the Money Supply -- ramping up the printing presses -- and guess what? Ben Bernanke is a BIG TIME believer in this idea. When you combine his appointment with the announcement to stop publishing M3, along with the odd Caribbean buying of US assets, it seems like a real possibility. ~ zynner | ||
| | |
| | #49 (permalink) (top) |
| moderat-e/o-r Location: boston Posts: 11,184 | i'm definitely betting on another rate hike... there's a lot more to the economy than the real estate market - and in particular, speculators who decided to get variable rate mortgages believing that they would flip their investment for some absurd profit. fixed rate mortgages are still reasonable, which is why we are once again flirting with an inverted yield curve. but besides real estate, we're seeing a significant drop in productivity and an increase in wages.. under greenspan, that scenario would certainly result in a rate hike - question is, how similar are bernanke's views to greenspan's? diminishing productivity and increased wages are both a perfect recipe for inflation as well as mass layoffs, drops in consumer confidence and spending, etc... http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/060808/economy.html?.v=4 imo, there is still strong growth across the aggregate - but there clearly seems to be big problems looming on the horizon. i'm not yet of the opinion that they are insurmountable, but i'm beginning to lean that way. |
| | |
| | #51 (permalink) (top) | |
| moderat-e/o-r Location: boston Posts: 11,184 | nope, i already posted about that: Quote:
that said, it looked like eslr's price drop following bernanke's announcement was just a bunch of hysteria.. could represent a good short-term buying opportunity, even though i'm not going to take the bait. the only two that i'm holding on to right now are GG and IFN.. gold's a decent thing to hold on to right now imo, and i'm going to hold on to IFN for decades, so i don't care so much about whatever happens in the market right now (plus it pays very healthy dividends). i was surprised that the fed did decide to stop hiking rates this time around... but, i still think that we're going to see future rate hikes in the future.. it's going to happen until the fed induces another round of mass layoffs in the country. | |
| | |
| | #52 (permalink) (top) |
| Hot Lava Posts: 817 | Did you see what the home builder Toll Brothers (TOL) said today? Terrible earnings, slowdown in building going forward, and the worst slowdown in 40 years on the horizon. Not that I believe them -- CEO is a liar. But they're not the only one seeing a slowdown in new home construction. I know someone in that industry and they are giving all sorts of incentives to unload properties. Those incentives do not show up in statistics of selling prices. So, prices are dropping more than statistics show. Mortgage companies also taking a beating. Since 40% of all new job growth in the USA over the past 5 years was in the real estate industry, this is worse than just housing price drops. Also, credit card usage up 10% last month. Not good. Bear market. ~ zynner |
| | |