Register (it's free)
Volconvo Debate Forums
Advertise Here »
Browse ad-free by donating
The Debate Forums Blogs | Donate Register (it's free) Chatroom Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read  
  Volconvo / Debate Forums / Philosophy & Religion


This topic in Philosophy & Religion is about Links on abolishing money:.

Reply  
 
Thread Tools
Old Jul 6, 2006, 12:01 pm   #281 (permalink) (top)
grandpa
blasphemer
 
grandpa's Avatar
 
Location: Michigan
Posts: 7,973
Quote:
Quote by: tman_ndsu08
Nope.
You always have to pay to get something.
There is no free lunch.
People can do things freely, and have. I've given you personal examples.
They don't do it as often as they'd like--but they are compelled to obey the status quo.

Quote:
Quote by: tman_ndsu08
Not paying rent = stealing.
The social arrengement you are defending creates thieves. Both tenants and landlords are made into thieves under your vicious scheme.


Quote:
Quote by: tman_ndsu08
They should be forced.
Otherwise you're letting them get away with stealing.
And the people paying rent agreed to pay it in
the first place.
Stealing and fraud is inherently a part of this arrangement. It is set up so everybody is stealing all the time. The landlord uses force against the tenant just so someone can occupy a space (legal stealing), the tenant does not always make payments (the illegal kind of stealing).
Such forceful arrangements are actually the reason people go bankrupt and live in poverty. Nobody would choose this arrengement unless they were compelled into it. Then you justify this extortion by calling it a choice. Well, anything is a choice, but it doesn't mean it's the right one. The rational alternative is to let people live outside of this system of exploitation.


Quote:
Quote by: tman_ndsu08
Nope.
Someone owns that house.
Pay rent to them or get out.
Someone claims to own it, but they do not live there.
No house needs to be registered in order to exist and have people living in it.
As usual, your arguments are the same any protection racket would use. At the surface, they appear moral--using language about "theft" and protective service, but it is actually the opposite of what is moral.
I suggest people stop paying rent/property taxes and stay where they have lived. NOTHING will change outside of what the landlord/government will do. That is very revealing of what problems rent addresses---none. It IS the problem. It involves a forceful, irrational scheme designed to maintain class division (to the point of maintaining a caste system).
It is designed to create conflict, which is probably another reason you support it. You seem tolove the idea that you are better than everyone else--everybody else who you feel you must be in conflict with.


Quote:
Quote by: tman_ndsu08
Such choices don't exists.
That's called stealing and you should be punished for it.
Choices always exist. But this shows how remarkably inconsistent you are. Just a few sentences ago you were telling me how people have a choice (which I agree with, though it's a very limited choice, to the point of almost being false), and now you say no choice exists. This logic that someone should claim something they do not use ought to be ignored as nonsense. Once again, we see the status quo defended by nonsense.

Quote:
Quote by: tman_ndsu08
Paying property taxes != the government owning my property.
The government owns your property. It owns land and buildings, which is the basis of landlordism. When you pay property taxes, you are purchasing your property. When you rent that property out to someone else, you are merely extending the fraud. In fact, landlords mimick the behavior of government--which is claiming ownership of things they do not use.

Quote:
Quote by: tman_ndsu08
A private government can't exist because a government can only exist if taxes exist.
Not necessarily true. Government is "The agency or apparatus through which a governing individual or body functions and exercises authority." Nowhere in the definition are taxes even mentioned--that's because taxes needn't exist in order for people to have institutions.

Quote:
Quote by: tman_ndsu08
An airplane falling from the sky and destroying your house is completely within the realm of possibility.
Doesn't need to be considered when writing a contract.
If it happens, it ought to be considered, regardless of whether it's in the contract or not.

Grandpa h.


Do unto others as you would have them do unto you (unless it costs
something).
grandpa is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:44 pm.

Sponsors (become a sponsor)
Online Gambling, KFUPM ePrints, Double Glazing UK, Free Online Games, xango, UK Car Insurance, Beauty Salon, Beauty Salons, Coach Handbags, Miele Vacuums, Plus Size Bras, Horses for Sale, Ventrilo Server, liquid vitamins, weight loss, Smiley Central, Monetise your website, Ventrilo Server, Dyson Vacuums, Hydroponics & Grow Lights, Offshore banking, beauty salons, Offshore banking, Connecticut Electric Rate, Retail Electric Providers Cirro Energy, LasVegas Vacations, Web Design, homes in hudson, Affordable Web Hosting, Texas Electric Rate Cirro Energy, Security Audit, Guy Factor, Gun Forums, Ringtone Loan Online Advertising 100% Cars Mobile Phones
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.7.3 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0

© 2003–2008 Volconvo.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10