![]() |
|
| The Debate Forums | Blogs | | | Donate | Register (it's free) | Chatroom | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||||
|
| | Thread Tools |
| | #41 (permalink) (top) |
| Principled Observer Location: Toledo, Ohio Posts: 13,873 | That is why more people need to start LEARNING how OUR GOVERNMENT is supposed to operate, and that is aimed at ALL people reading, REGARDLESS of where you are from. Ignorant people are led, educated citizens are governed. Petition of Redress of Grievances: http://www.givemeliberty.org/default.htm Canadian Lawsuit Against Their National Banks: http://www.freewebs.com/classaction/ Osborn F. Enready |
| | |
| | #42 (permalink) (top) | |
| Reaganomics Location: In the Southwest, Baby! Yeeepah! Posts: 740 | Quote:
People need to register to vote -- only half of the American population can vote. If there are some who don't trust our politicians.........*ahem....they should form PACS or special interest groups and take advantage of their right to do so. Regardless......Congressman, Senators and public servant officials are voted positions. They have been voted by those who took the time to register and vote -- it's called democracy. Iraqi's Celebrate! I know in my heart that man is good. That what is right will always eventually triumph. And there's purpose and worth to each and every life. -Ronald Reagan | |
| | |
| | #43 (permalink) (top) | |
| Molten Ash Posts: 34 | Quote:
Those with power are those with money. They're almost always men and almost always white. Anyone else has to struggle long and hard in the court of public opinion (Martin Luther King, Jr. for example) to make his or her mark as a leader (usually, there have been exceptions). The guys currently calling the shots bought their way there. Even if John Jojammer dared to speak out against the establishment, he'd soon go broke defending the defamation suit. That's the way things work. The wealthy call all the shots and control free speech - and "free" speech can get pretty expensive if you tick off the wrong person. Chill | |
| | |
| | #44 (permalink) (top) | |
| Iceberg Location: Connecticut Posts: 5,703 | Quote:
It has caused countless deaths and countless wars, all in the name of a God who people can't even agree on to define. Talk about hypocrites, religious fanatics are even worse than politicians. And one has to go quite far to top them. Organized religion ![]() Brien the Iceberg If you tell the truth you don't have to remember anything. M.T. Last edited by brien; Feb 27, 2006 at 03:55 pm. | |
| | |
| | #45 (permalink) (top) | ||
| Principled Observer Location: Toledo, Ohio Posts: 13,873 | Quote:
Why become another tentacle of the problem? The problem is PACS and special intrest groups, lobbyists, pork, earmarks, lies, lack of accountability and an absolute ignorance of the role of the Constitution. Until there is more than two parties to choose from officially, it is counter productive to be a part of the problem. That money could be spent in better ways, to do more good. I am helping an Ohio canidate right now, trying to get him on the ballot. You want a challenge, try getting a third party recognized against the bi-partisan monopoly enforced in local, state and federal laws!!!!! What am I saying though, you are part of the Neo-Con movement aren't you? (acknowledging ahead of time I may be wrong in my conclusion.) Quote:
I agree, but your answer is too vague. I challenge you to be more accurate in your assesment. I think it would more appropriately be called a rigged, or fixed democracy, since the bi-partisan monopoly has effectively wrangled all support in laws that only apply to them. I would also say your little democracy rieks of coruption from corporate influence, and pork peddlers in the form of lobbyists and the groups you speak of. This U.S. resembles nothing like the Constitutionally Limited, Democratic Representative Republic it was designed as, and the neo-cons have been brainwashed into buying the story that we are a "democracy". How much more vague could you have been? Scham democracy, maybe? Petition of Redress of Grievances: http://www.givemeliberty.org/default.htm Canadian Lawsuit Against Their National Banks: http://www.freewebs.com/classaction/ Osborn F. Enready | ||
| | |
| | #46 (permalink) (top) | |
| Principled Observer Location: Toledo, Ohio Posts: 13,873 | Quote:
I agree 100%. A mans beliefs are between man and God of his beleifs. There is no need for external validation through focus groups, and organized cultism. If you need external validation as an individual, it should extend as far as the family, if they will tolerate it and accept it. The old saying comes to mind...... "you just don't talk about religion with people you like, if you want to keep like'n em." There are some differences carved in stone in the individuals core. That is why it is best to focus on the common threads, and not the vast amount of differences in law. Petition of Redress of Grievances: http://www.givemeliberty.org/default.htm Canadian Lawsuit Against Their National Banks: http://www.freewebs.com/classaction/ Osborn F. Enready | |
| | |
| | #47 (permalink) (top) | |
| Principled Observer Location: Toledo, Ohio Posts: 13,873 | Quote:
Now ask the hard question. How did it get this way? It is not that hard to figure out using your own voiced logic. Follow the money trail, uncover the truths buried under reams of lies and propaganda, follow the names to their jobs and connections, notice the dates of new laws being passed and who pushed and supported them, and VOILA! Answers become much clearer. I know the answers, and they all involve the strays AWAY from Constitutional law, mainly concerning size of government, scope of government, banking and finance and everybodies favorite topic, TAXATION. If we operated according to the designs of the system, the system would yield back what it was designed to provide, liberty and justice for all. We live in a world of absolute controlled information, minus of course the internet, which is short lived, and exclusive already. WE are limited by money because WE the people can't compete on an individual level with CORPORATIONS who are bands of few individuals, granted the rights of one individual, but with NO RESPONSIBILITIES, at least accountable by law. Give the power over the right to incorporate back to the people, ban all corporations from using the 14th amendment for legal purposes, and we will be well on our way back to being able to restore constitutional law, representative government, REASONABLE taxation based on necessity and not pork, less military aggression, and more defense building and training and of course less involving foreign policies focusing on our nation and the nations that respect the rights of the individuals that make them up, so we can truly once again, encourage a free trade market between right recognizing nations. Petition of Redress of Grievances: http://www.givemeliberty.org/default.htm Canadian Lawsuit Against Their National Banks: http://www.freewebs.com/classaction/ Osborn F. Enready | |
| | |
| | #48 (permalink) (top) | |
| BANNED: Troll Posts: 165 | Incorrect Statement Quote:
The Muslims lost their Empire (Ottman Empire which was once one of the largest on earth) when they were stupid enough to pick a fight with the much-larger British Empire. As a result the British destroyed that Muslim Empire. Perhaps the Muslims are none to happy about this yes? They need to be told they brought the end to their Empire upon themselves. Rather a stupid move attacking an Empire that was far more powerful than they were. It is my contention that the individuals of earth should be thanking my British ancestors for ensuring the destruction of the Ottoman Empire for if the Muslims could cause this much trouble without any power can one imagine what the Muslims could do with a powerful Empire backing them up? You are all welcome. Christianity never sought out the destruction of other religions. At worst it only sought to convert others to worship their religion. This is to be expected since religions desire to increase the number of their followers. Islam does this through force (see the Balkans for proof as one would be hard-pressed to believe blue-eyed blonde individuals sought to become Muslim). The world should be thankful to the European empires for keeping the expansion of the Ottoman Empire in check which is why Islam only got as far as Bosnia etc. Could one imagine an Europe ruled by Arab leaders? You people have no idea of the things that could have happened had the Muslims succeeded with their expansion into Europe. Christianity stopped the Muslims cold. This was pure DEFENCE just as it is in Nigeria where Christians are fighting Muslims as they should. Let us never forget the Muslims attacked first. You would the Christians should simply sit there and allow themselves to be overcome? Rather a stupid view I daresay. It is my contention that when the British crushed the Ottoman Empire it should have sought out further destruction of Islam. This would simply be an act of self-defence for jihad seeks an end to the lives of all infidels (read the Qu'ran people). Destroy others before they destroy you. Simple. The Soviets entered Afghanistan (they never invaded people, they were invited by the ruling Communist Party of Afghanistan to defend them from the nutcase Mujahadeen who are today's Taliban). Read a little history people. Islam is a danger that needs to be crushed. AGAIN. SaintLucifer The Dark Saint | |
| | |
| | #49 (permalink) (top) | |
| Skeptical Patriot Posts: 7,746 | Quote:
| |
| | |