![]() |
|
| The Debate Forums | Blogs | | | Donate | Register (it's free) | Chatroom | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||||
|
| | Thread Tools |
| | #21 (permalink) (top) |
| The Electric Messiah Location: California Posts: 145 | If civil unions became the option that offered equality to all families, my wife and I would get a divorce in a heartbeat! It would actually be a very romantic ordeal... (technicly marriage has been altered to prevent gay marriage. For or against - both options involved altering "marriage". I love that conservatism so often mean preserving things the way they never were,,, Anyhow, if the meaning of mariage has to evolve, I'd much rather see it take the loving path, then be altered out of spite...) Economic Left/Right: -3.75 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.72 Never trust anything that can think for itself if you can't see where it keeps its brain. J. K. Rowling Last edited by Savant; Jul 5, 2005 at 10:11 pm. |
| | |
| | #22 (permalink) (top) |
| Navy Veteran Location: Texas Posts: 6,031 | Sigh. What inequality Belverrone? In a name? Gvie me a break would ya? Civili Union = Marriage sans the word "marriage" for legal intents and purposes. So there is no inequality. Next. As for the word game Prometheus... why did Gay Marriage fail in ever state it's been tried via refferendum? Oh because the majority of Americans have an affinity for "marriage" and don't want it messed with. So your plan of removing the name wouldn't fly either. So your solution is a non-solution. I am offering a reasonable comprimise that give both sides what they want. Homosexuals want the rights and legal status of Marriage, most Americans want "Marriage" to mean a man and a woman. Damn, why is that so freaking hard for people to understand? There is no inequality if both Civil Unions and Marriage confer the same Rights and Legal Standing. If you try and alter "Marriage" the public has shown time and again they won't stand for it. So QUIT mucking with marriage and comprimise. You WON'T get people to accept Gay Marriage, and you WON'T get them to remove the term either. Get it? You're both pushing losing causes for.. what? A word? Why? Einstein's "Theory of Relativity" is still being challenged to this day, but by consensus Global Warming is a fact... that's REAL science at work, why didn't Albert just go that route? |
| | |
| | #23 (permalink) (top) | |
| Igneous Magma Location: Northeastern, USA Posts: 606 | Quote:
Isn't is YOUR side that wants to amend the Constitution to define marriage? | |
| | |
| | #24 (permalink) (top) |
| Navy Veteran Location: Texas Posts: 6,031 | Yep. They want Marriage to be defined as a "Man and a Woman" Kinda proves my point about how strongly the sentiment is to leave the definition alone. Don't get rid of it, don't add more to it, leave it alone. Fine. Homosexuals want the legal status and rights of marriage. Great. Call it civil Unions, ignore the term marriage, and you win an inroad. Gay Marriage will happen one day, but I think we are 10-15 years off. At the least. the more the Gay Activist slam Gay Marriage the more likely that amendment has of passing. Einstein's "Theory of Relativity" is still being challenged to this day, but by consensus Global Warming is a fact... that's REAL science at work, why didn't Albert just go that route? |
| | |
| | #25 (permalink) (top) |
| formerly Isherwood Location: San Diego, CA Posts: 13,364 | And the far right's desire to ban gay marriage, it has little if anything to do with the word "marriage". That's just a side issue to distract from the homophobic and ignorant fear many of them feel toward gays in general. Many legislators may make speeches praising the nuclear family, the Waltons and the Cleavers, but they have often had divorces and bad relationships of their own. They're no fools. They know they can't openly proclaim prejudice, so they make a big deal out of preserving the idealistic concept of marriage...all the while really just trying to make sure gays are kept out of sight and quiet. The Forum Rules Radical Atheist Heathen Queer Let's agree to respect each others views, no matter how wrong yours may be. (Ashleigh Brilliant) |
| | |
| | #26 (permalink) (top) | |
| Glad to be back! Location: Vernal, UT Posts: 1,725 | Quote:
Fixed ideas are like a cramp in the foot - the best remedy against it is to tread on it. -Søren Kierkegaard | |
| | |
| | #27 (permalink) (top) | |
| Navy Veteran Location: Texas Posts: 6,031 | Quote:
I would be 100% behind Civil Unions, I am agains the gay marriage amendment, and I support TG persons and rights 100%. That being said I also find myself against homosexuality based on principle, and morals. But that doesn't mean I hate, or fear them. Einstein's "Theory of Relativity" is still being challenged to this day, but by consensus Global Warming is a fact... that's REAL science at work, why didn't Albert just go that route? | |
| | |
| | #28 (permalink) (top) |
| formerly Isherwood Location: San Diego, CA Posts: 13,364 | But you want me to believe there's a push to amend the constitution of the United States for no better reason, and with no more motive, than to preserve the meaning of a word? I'm not that big of a fool. The Forum Rules Radical Atheist Heathen Queer Let's agree to respect each others views, no matter how wrong yours may be. (Ashleigh Brilliant) |
| | |
| | #29 (permalink) (top) | ||
| Beloved Truth-Dragon Location: Texas Posts: 1,299 | Quote:
Quote:
And well said, Isher. If only I could saith, so should I. | ||
| | |
| | #30 (permalink) (top) | ||
| Hot Lava Location: Redlands, CA Posts: 2,258 | Quote:
Quote:
| ||
| | |
| | #31 (permalink) (top) | |
| BANNED: Repeated insults Posts: 4,828 | Quote:
Starboy Last edited by Starboy; Jul 7, 2005 at 01:28 pm. | |
| | |
| | #32 (permalink) (top) |
| Sedimentary Rock Posts: 7 | What church do you attend, starboy? None? Probably. Anywise, Any church that endorses Gay marriage should have their head examined, although there are apparently a lot of them. I know I live in the Bible belt, but Gee Whiz! Endorsing Gay marriage, or even Homosexuality on any level is Biblically the same as endorsing murder, and nobody does that nowadays except extremist muslims, and we're droppin bombs on them. before long we'll end up firing cruise missiles at your local church because they feel like endorsing murder. Anything else Ya'll wanna endorse? Teen pregnancy? Hey, it feels good, who cares about the bible. Praise God! No wonder people call us Hypocrites, because we are. We need a mass ethical reform or we're gonna end up as left wing as the New York Times by gosh!!! |
| | |
| | #33 (permalink) (top) |
| formerly Isherwood Location: San Diego, CA Posts: 13,364 | I presume then, if a murderer got out of prison and wanted to get married in your church, you'd refuse him? The Forum Rules Radical Atheist Heathen Queer Let's agree to respect each others views, no matter how wrong yours may be. (Ashleigh Brilliant) |
| | |
| | #34 (permalink) (top) | |
| Beloved Truth-Dragon Location: Texas Posts: 1,299 | Quote:
How would you feel if Jews tried to legislate a kosher diet? Cue Inquisitor with the "Jews are heretics" line. If only I could saith, so should I. Last edited by belverron; Jul 8, 2005 at 10:55 pm. Reason: Comic relief. | |
| | |
| | #35 (permalink) (top) | |
| BANNED: Repeated insults Posts: 4,828 | Quote:
Starboy | |
| | |