Volconvo is a debate forum for the discussion of political, religious, and news-based topics.

Colonel Bill · May 28, 2005, 03:15 pm

Right and Wrong are in the background and ahead. Right and wrong before you. Can you jump?

Can you stop to continue what you finish?

Dadoo · May 29, 2005, 02:34 pm

Col. Bill,

"...Can you jump?"

No, You cannot. Yes, You can.
As long as Right and wrong are within your view,
the choice to jump is "available".
I do not mislabel generalized polarity with the scenario-based names.
(Unless I riddle?)

"...Can you stop"

Yes. The stopping itself is inevitable. No complimentary pairings allow for single-minded assuredness. When right and wrong are before you, you may then be right, or wrong. To "stop" implies motion. Duality springs forth. It cannot be corked. Stopping occurs moreso when the "agent" no longer holds this wish, nor the thought of seeking a peaceful state.

"...to continue what you finish?"

One must always bear in mind the freedom/ liberation of maintaining options. An option that requires "faith" is implied for me here.
I believe there is an end to the oscillation of these hemispheres of
"do"/ "not do".
Since what I do causes reaction,
peace must reside upon the "not do" path.

Since "not do" also causes reaction, by contrast,
peace must not reside upon either path.

The third option-
further division?

Or recombination of it's duelling "Ur" components?

Or "neither?"

So what was the question, Bill?

Dadoo

:eek:

May 28, 2005, 03:15 pm	#1 (permalink) (top)
Colonel Bill Molten Ash Posts: 35	If I Pay Thee Not Right and Wrong are in the background and ahead. Right and wrong before you. Can you jump? Can you stop to continue what you finish? Vanishing Hut http://vanishinghut.blogspot.com/

May 29, 2005, 02:34 pm	#2 (permalink) (top)
Dadoo Pure Energy Posts: 320	Col. Bill, "...Can you jump?" No, You cannot. Yes, You can. As long as Right and wrong are within your view, the choice to jump is "available". I do not mislabel generalized polarity with the scenario-based names. (Unless I riddle?) "...Can you stop" Yes. The stopping itself is inevitable. No complimentary pairings allow for single-minded assuredness. When right and wrong are before you, you may then be right, or wrong. To "stop" implies motion. Duality springs forth. It cannot be corked. Stopping occurs moreso when the "agent" no longer holds this wish, nor the thought of seeking a peaceful state. "...to continue what you finish?" One must always bear in mind the freedom/ liberation of maintaining options. An option that requires "faith" is implied for me here. I believe there is an end to the oscillation of these hemispheres of "do"/ "not do". Since what I do causes reaction, peace must reside upon the "not do" path. Since "not do" also causes reaction, by contrast, peace must not reside upon either path. The third option- further division? Or recombination of it's duelling "Ur" components? Or "neither?" So what was the question, Bill? Dadoo :eek: Leave both pain & pleasures behind you; Discover the treasures buried inside you!