Volconvo is a debate forum for the discussion of political, religious, and news-based topics.

MerlinsByte · Apr 22, 2005, 07:35 am

I would ask any reader of my posts realize that most of my beliefs up to and including my religious beliefs are subject to change in the face of overwhelming logical evidence. Also some of my ideas theories, hypothetical, and beliefs are just that and are not complete. Below is some more rough draft any constructive comments would be appreciated pro or con

In an earlier post I put forth the idea that we as individuals have separate realities and separate universes that were nearly identical and were connected casually (1) by some sort of quantum interaction. A simple way to visualize this is foam of soap bubbles the bubbles being universes of each person on earth. (2) The foam taken as a clump is encased in a super universe that the creator, for lack of a better word observes. (3)

Each individual has a different space-time line (4) and therefore I argue there is a universe for each time line (5) our personal time line IS the domain of our reality.

If all motion could be stopped in the universe (6) our time lines would converge and we would be one again (7). That is with god. This would happen because according to the theory of general relativity (8) any body in motion and separated by distance experiences time differently (such as time dilation for example).

notes

(1) Casually connected is this: A extreme example…you and I may live in exactly similar universes except for one atom one being a ion and the other not, everything else we would say is the same. The same earth the same history the same everything. However your reality nonetheless would demand a separate universe. We can interact with each other because of a quantum connection that allows us to experience each other’s universe as the illusion that it is our own universe, when in reality it is a mirror universe that is nearly the same.

(2) This is similar to the membrane theory (M theory) of mainstream quantum theory

(3) We have a separate time line because of the position of our flesh and blood body occupies different vectors in space. Just because we happen to be on a planet the laws of general relativity apply to us also, that is that tow bodies in movement and separated by distance experience time differently. I feel some quantum events come into play also but that is a different chapter.

(4&5) The time line is our reality without a time line we could not exist in a physical law universe.

(6) If motion stopped feel we all would merge because the laws of physics i.e. general relativity would not apply because our time lines would then be indicial and become one.

(7&8) see 6 also see chapter 3

mb

tman_ndsu08 · Apr 22, 2005, 11:00 am

I have bad news for you.

Time dialation applies only to bodies that are accelerating, not simply in motion.

MerlinsByte · Apr 25, 2005, 06:49 am

By Tman_ndsu08........(how do yaall' up with these names?)

Quote:

I have bad news for you
Time dialation applies only to bodies that are accelerating, not simply in motion.

No, I have bad news for you fellow time traveler...

If I accelerate away from you by moving one millimeter, I have accelerated away from you, no? If you happen to accelerate away from me even for a fraction of a nanosecond (one-thousand-millionth of a second) you have just encountered the effects of time dilation.

mb

tman_ndsu08 · Apr 25, 2005, 09:15 am

Accelration only happens when the derivative of velocity is greater than zero.

Trotsky · Apr 25, 2005, 09:38 am

That would be when the velocity of the object increases with respect to time

x = distance
dx/dt = velocity
d2x/dt2 = accelaration

That is if I haven't forgotten my leaving cert maths

tman_ndsu08 · Apr 25, 2005, 11:16 am

Yes, that's right.

MerlinsByte · Apr 25, 2005, 11:30 am

Quote:

from tman_ndsu08...Accelration only happens when the derivative of velocity is greater than zero.

from...Trotsky

That would be when the velocity of the object increases with respect to time

I stand still you move away from me at one millimeter pre SEC increasing to 1.999999 mill. Per sec, you are accelerating. Also the acceleration needn't be linear. If you move a billionth of a millimeter in any direction relative to anything else and you accelerate away from what you are comparing it to. In this example that would be me.

Your acceleration in both examples are relative to time unless move instantaneously which would put you back where you started. Time dilation is a fact not a theory, and happens at non-relativistic speeds. This has been proven using two atomic clocks moving rather slowly relative to each other. Substitute these clocks and you have time traveling humans.

mb

tman_ndsu08 · Apr 25, 2005, 05:59 pm

That's not true. If you're moving at 1 billionith of a meter per second for the whole second, then you're not accelerating.

MerlinsByte · Apr 25, 2005, 10:06 pm

Merlin writes...I said from rest. (1) Or if you must I mil per sec. per sec. for 1 trillionth of a sec. more or less.

mb

(1) nothing is actually at rest in the universe but I also said relative (to the measurement object(s)

tman_ndsu08 · Apr 25, 2005, 11:52 pm

If you're going 1 mm per second^2 for for any amount of time, then you're accelerating.

Starboy · Apr 26, 2005, 12:21 am

Give it up tman_ndsu08. In order to understand mechanics you must understand calculus. Based on Merlin's comments it is clear he understands neither. I am sure that he does not grasp the idea of a derivative. You are wasting your time anyway because all Merlin can do is piss on it. That is his best argument.

Starboy

Apr 22, 2005, 07:35 am	#1 (permalink) (top)
MerlinsByte BANNED Posts: 1,267	You and your personal space time line I would ask any reader of my posts realize that most of my beliefs up to and including my religious beliefs are subject to change in the face of overwhelming logical evidence. Also some of my ideas theories, hypothetical, and beliefs are just that and are not complete. Below is some more rough draft any constructive comments would be appreciated pro or con In an earlier post I put forth the idea that we as individuals have separate realities and separate universes that were nearly identical and were connected casually (1) by some sort of quantum interaction. A simple way to visualize this is foam of soap bubbles the bubbles being universes of each person on earth. (2) The foam taken as a clump is encased in a super universe that the creator, for lack of a better word observes. (3) Each individual has a different space-time line (4) and therefore I argue there is a universe for each time line (5) our personal time line IS the domain of our reality. If all motion could be stopped in the universe (6) our time lines would converge and we would be one again (7). That is with god. This would happen because according to the theory of general relativity (8) any body in motion and separated by distance experiences time differently (such as time dilation for example). notes (1) Casually connected is this: A extreme example…you and I may live in exactly similar universes except for one atom one being a ion and the other not, everything else we would say is the same. The same earth the same history the same everything. However your reality nonetheless would demand a separate universe. We can interact with each other because of a quantum connection that allows us to experience each other’s universe as the illusion that it is our own universe, when in reality it is a mirror universe that is nearly the same. (2) This is similar to the membrane theory (M theory) of mainstream quantum theory (3) We have a separate time line because of the position of our flesh and blood body occupies different vectors in space. Just because we happen to be on a planet the laws of general relativity apply to us also, that is that tow bodies in movement and separated by distance experience time differently. I feel some quantum events come into play also but that is a different chapter. (4&5) The time line is our reality without a time line we could not exist in a physical law universe. (6) If motion stopped feel we all would merge because the laws of physics i.e. general relativity would not apply because our time lines would then be indicial and become one. (7&8) see 6 also see chapter 3 mb Last edited by MerlinsByte; Apr 22, 2005 at 07:57 am.

Apr 25, 2005, 09:38 am	#5 (permalink) (top)
Trotsky Stront vir breins Location: Buckinghamshire, UK Posts: 540	That would be when the velocity of the object increases with respect to time x = distance dx/dt = velocity d2x/dt2 = accelaration That is if I haven't forgotten my leaving cert maths " UKIP -- the United Kingdom Independence Party, the golf club version of the BNP, British National Party. " Middle East.. "The vile leading the stupid to kill the decent in the name of the holy."

Apr 25, 2005, 10:06 pm	#9 (permalink) (top)
MerlinsByte BANNED Posts: 1,267	Merlin writes...I said from rest. (1) Or if you must I mil per sec. per sec. for 1 trillionth of a sec. more or less. mb (1) nothing is actually at rest in the universe but I also said relative (to the measurement object(s) Last edited by MerlinsByte; Apr 25, 2005 at 10:10 pm.

Apr 22, 2005, 11:00 am	#2 (permalink) (top)
tman_ndsu08 BANNED Posts: 5,021	I have bad news for you. Time dialation applies only to bodies that are accelerating, not simply in motion.

Apr 25, 2005, 09:15 am	#4 (permalink) (top)
tman_ndsu08 BANNED Posts: 5,021	Accelration only happens when the derivative of velocity is greater than zero.

Apr 25, 2005, 11:16 am	#6 (permalink) (top)
tman_ndsu08 BANNED Posts: 5,021	Yes, that's right.

Apr 25, 2005, 05:59 pm	#8 (permalink) (top)
tman_ndsu08 BANNED Posts: 5,021	That's not true. If you're moving at 1 billionith of a meter per second for the whole second, then you're not accelerating.

Apr 25, 2005, 11:52 pm	#10 (permalink) (top)
tman_ndsu08 BANNED Posts: 5,021	If you're going 1 mm per second^2 for for any amount of time, then you're accelerating.

Apr 26, 2005, 12:21 am	#11 (permalink) (top)
Starboy BANNED: Repeated insults Posts: 4,828	Give it up tman_ndsu08. In order to understand mechanics you must understand calculus. Based on Merlin's comments it is clear he understands neither. I am sure that he does not grasp the idea of a derivative. You are wasting your time anyway because all Merlin can do is piss on it. That is his best argument. Starboy