What I seen is that civilized and advanced nations (secular) are pro-choice, for womans rights, against racism and so on, whiles backwards nations (highly religious people) are against abortion and womans right, racism, for oppression and hatred as well as warmongers.
Western Europe, Japan(?), Oceania etc is a good example of civilized whiles the Middle East and, in many ways, U.S an example of uncivilized still not reached the educated point of getting rid of religious power.
Are immunizations propaganda? Toying with life? What are you a Christian Scientist? A conception is not a science experiment? What are you afraid of? Being dead or just dying? Maybe everyone should suffer and do nothing to stop it. That being the way God intends it. Bullshit. I'd bet you go to doctors who toy with your life.
I'll tell you why I will NOT stop "toying" with life. It's because of complacent do nothings that slobber over the natural order undisturbed by human endeavors. Those that can only get up when playing "God" is advocated to eliminate polio, genetic illness, and war from the memories of mankind. Those simpletons fear that man's abilities will exceed that of their God, as if imagining such foolish vanity would make it so.
If the terrain and the map do not agree, follow the terrain.
When motherhood becomes the fruit of a deep yearning, not the result of ignorance or accident, its children will become a new race.
Any pro-choice person that makes this argument is either nonsensical themselves or is arguing such in the light of an pro-life point of view. Because if a pro-choice person does not believe they are killing anything when it comes to an implanted fetus. Then why would it matter whether it was born in a good or a bad environment? Would or wouldn't it be a life from the start is the real issue. If it is then its genocide to belive in abortion of any group. If its not then all is fair. So it really just leads us back to that main topic doesn't it? Is an implanted fetus a life?
Using statistics to prevent activities based on the perceived notion of future criminal or epidemic incidence is far too authoritarian. This includes this particular topic, drug use, laws targeting AIDS among gays, laws targeting muslims at airports, laws targeting fake child pornography among pedophiles, laws targeting black youth in urban areas, laws targeting political philosophies, etc...
Your inconsistency in this area gives me the inability to defend you in this case.
Why believe abortion is right but then hide it behind fear and other mess? If abortion is right it shouldn't matter whether you are aborting a rich persons fetus or a poor persons. Because to the pro-choice no wrong has been commited. But to the pro-life a wrong has. So the whole notion is Non-sensical!!!
The iuployment stands at ten percent for every country. This means thatone in ten people will be unemployed, maybe two will be criminals, one policeperson, three corporate persons and maybe three in industry and then the rest in other jobs. The point remains that for every criminal born there is a police person born, yes?
Now, when it comes to abortion you need to understand that it is not wrong nor right to abort, it is a choice. If you count all your sperms and eggs getting wasted each month, then there are a lot more children. If you think of a baby that is capable of feeling things being harmed, then that is wrong. If you were to think of murder as if it were when you kill someone that is living, is that wrong?
When it comes to society people feel it is wrong to abort off the bat. This is reflex. That means it is anti societal and wrong - to abort. Doing something wrong for a good reason is still wrong.
!! Don't fear the reaper !!
Well that depends on who you are talking to. Are you the Universal standard dictionary to declare such a thing? And I think deciding when its a viable life is the real discussion! Otherwise you win and confusion and fightings still persist. Maybe some on your end prefer that.