![]() |
|
| The Debate Forums | Blogs | | | Donate | Register (it's free) | Chatroom | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||||
|
| | Thread Tools |
| | #1 (permalink) (top) |
![]() Ready to Rok Location: Oklahoma Posts: 1,930 | Homosexuality in the View of a Christian I am a Catholic Christian. I am from Oklahoma. These two truths being stated, I consider this little incident to be a personal insult to me when I read the top stories in the morning... Tulsa World: Oklahoma legislator's anti-gay comments stir hostile reaction What was even more distrubing was that Kerns recieved a standing ovation from many in the room and many thankful emails telling her to keep sharing the truth. What truth does she share with us? That homosexuality is a greater threat to this nation than terrorism. This act, while making me yell WHAT THE F**K? loudly in my house has sent me off on a rant about how inconsiderate many Christians are towards homosexuality and how wrong this is. People such as Representative Kerns should not be speaking this bullshit in Congress. I am disgusted by her acts and realize how negatively this impacts outsiders views of Oklahoma and impacts an overall view of Christians. So let me clarify the position I hold about homosexuality in relation to Christianity. First, if you are a homosexual it is NOT A SIN. I don't care how many quotes some one produces from the Bible to try and "proove" the opposite. Notice that Bible-Thumpers only produce CERTAIN quotes from the Bible based on what suits them but will IGNORE the rest. Many quotes will be read from Leviticus or Deuteronomy about how it is sinful for one man to lay with another YET no one wants to bring up how sinful it is to work on the Sabbath. I believe the penalty is being stoned to death. Inconsistency abounds which is why the Bible is not PROOF against homosexuality's acceptance. Those who advocate it as such advocate a MASSIVE double standard. Second, God LOVES all persons NO MATTER what sexual orientation. As a Christian I believe that man was created in God's IMAGE and LIKENESS. Persons with homosexual preference were created no differently than those with heterosexual ones. And if Christians claim that God loves all, how can they say that God does not love homosexual persons? Are homosexuals not humans? Or did God mess up? NO! It instead means that we are all TRULY loved by God no matter what sexual preference and those who think otherwise do not TRULY love God because they ignore His Divine purpose. Gays are not the ones without love, haters are the ones who choose not to have love. Third, as to the ACTS of homosexuals...we as Christians DO NOT KNOW beyond a doubt what goes and does not go for God. We have not personally heard from God that all gays will go to hell but instead many Christians FALSELY ASSUME they will. This is the greatest dissappointment to me as a Christian. When other Christians try to tell the word of God to others when they don't know it. They can claim one thing or another, but who are they to tell us what God does and does not want? They can't. Therefore when reguarding the ACTS of homosexuals condemnation is a stupid idea. It lacks any theological foundation and does not solve any problems, but rather creates more. Christians therefore should keep and open mind on the act instead of just claiming that all will burn in Hell. It really pisses me off to know that many of my brothers and sisters in faith can be so close minded towards others. If Christianity is the spread of love and fogiveness can some one tell me why the f**k we have a Christian Congress woman denouncing the "evils" of homosexuality? Let me apologize as a Christian for the remarks my fellow "believer" has made. It is NOT the view all Christians hold. Trust me. ![]() ![]() "I believe Christianity as I believe the sun has risen: not only because I see it, but because by it, I see everything else." -C.S. Lewis- Last edited by Matt W; Mar 12, 2008 at 05:46 pm. |
| | |
| | #2 (permalink) (top) |
![]() Desert Sand Posts: 159 | I'm not a Kerns supporter. I am a Christian. I do believe that pursuing a homosexual lifestyle is sinful but preaching against it in church before a congregation is waaayyyy different than a public denunciation. Just because someone is predisposed toward same-sex attraction does not validate their indulging in it. If I'm genetically predisposed toward alcoholism, it does not give me a Godly green light to be a drunk, however, this applies to me as a Christian temporally and eternally. It applies to everyone eternally. If I truly care about the eternal welfare of my fellow human beings then I should do my level best to warn others of the eternal consequences of their actions and try to convince them of God's realness as well as His wrath upon the unrepentant. I don't approve of Hollywood trying to portray homosexuality as normal and good just as I don't approve of the liquor companies trying to entice me with seductive women on TV (like I need the encouragement, lol) but that's just the morally bankrupt world we live in. I'm pretty sure that if Kern meets with any success, it will be fairly short-lived like prohibition was. What I find equally troubling is that a self-professed "Christian" has absolutely no qualms about displaying a vulgar tongue on a public forum supporting an act that God has deemed an abomination. Shame, shame Jimmy. Note to physician: Irritation caused by wyoguy can be relieved by a liberal application of alcohol. http://www.reformed.org/documents/index.html |
| | |
| | #3 (permalink) (top) |
![]() Igneous Magma Posts: 207 | Hi Jimmy, I am a Christian also, and I agree with you. When I am in doubt about what the bible says, I always go with Jesus teachings. And Jesus said, let him who is without sin cast the first stone. I don't think gays are going to hell. We are judged on what we do, how loving we are to others. |
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) (top) |
| Hucking Fuskies Location: Conn Posts: 2,284 | Exactly. I like to think of the new covenant concept as overriding all the BS in most of the bible. The golden rule is one everyone can comprehend and agree on. What do you say to an atheist who sneezes? Yourdeadthatsit! - Dane Cook |
| | |
| | #6 (permalink) (top) |
![]() Molten Ash Posts: 101 | What does that mean: He who is without sin, let him cast the first stone, I don't get it. And I agree with Jimmy, The only part i don't understand is why people feel the need to put homosexuals down, because how does it affect chrisitans if people are gay, the chrisitans are still going to heavan and the homosexuals are going to hell so why do they care. To me it just seems like they are putting their nose in other peoples buisness. Oh and the Bible is really no way to justify anything, it was written in 300 a.d. by a group of men in a dark room trying to decide the best way to indoctrinate the world. Not that I'm saying there is no jesus, i just think the bible is a load. |
| | |
| | #8 (permalink) (top) | |
![]() Igneous Magma Posts: 207 | Quote:
The teachers of the law and the Pharisees brought in a woman caught in adultery. They made her stand before the group and said to Jesus, "Teacher, this woman was caught in the act of adultery. In the law Moses commanded us to stone such women. Now what do you say?" They were using this question as a trap, in order to have a basis for accusing him. But Jesus bent down and started to write on the ground with his finger. When they kept on questioning him, he straightened up and said to them, "If any one of you is without sin, let him be the first to throw a stone at her." Again he stooped down and wrote on the ground. At this, those who heard began to go away one at a time, the older ones first, until only Jesus was left, with the woman still standing there. Jesus straightened up and asked her, "Woman, where are they? Has no one condemned you?" "No one, sir," she said. "Then neither do I condemn you," Jesus declared. "Go now and leave your life of sin." | |
| | |
| | #9 (permalink) (top) |
| slipping sand Posts: 1,802 | Well you know what, I'm sorry but you can't act surprised. This is what your religion leads to for the majority of it's believers. It makes them think they are better then everyone else and can therefore judge and condemn others. Jesus may have said not to do so, but there's plenty of support in the bible for the other side too. The problem is your book is so contradictory that anyone can use it to justify any evil. What a piece of work is man! How noble in reason! The paragon of animals! And yet, to me, what is this quintessence of dust? Man delights not me; no, nor woman neither.. |
| | |
| | #11 (permalink) (top) |
| Hucking Fuskies Location: Conn Posts: 2,284 | OUR book? As in WE are all supporting hate? Plenty of hate and terror can come from the hearts and minds of atheists too. YOUR kind are not free from dirty hands. According to Matthew Jesus said the second most important law is to love our neighbor as yourself. Clearly the bible isn't just all hatred. Hatred comes from people bending words to suit their personal bigotry. What do you say to an atheist who sneezes? Yourdeadthatsit! - Dane Cook |
| | |
| | #12 (permalink) (top) | |
| Igneous Magma Posts: 316 | Whoa.... I read... Quote:
That by no means that Christianity is alone in having its holy texts misused. The only loophole atheists really have is that there's no Atheist High Command issuing orders AS ATHEISTS. The standard "Look at Stalin or Mao" arguments don't really work because atheism was only part of their puzzle, not the be all end all justification of the atrocities committed. And again, that's not to say atheists don't so bad stuff. Every group's got its bad guys. But I really didn't read that into the above comment. (I could be wrong, obviously, and perhaps have missed some subtle cue or secret wink, I guess...) | |
| | |
| | #13 (permalink) (top) | |
![]() Igneous Magma Posts: 207 | Quote:
When it comes to the bible, I go with what Jesus said, as he came after Moses law, and he is the Son of God. You are right though, it is confusing, there's much about it I don't understand either. But Jesus teachings make sense to me, and I do believe they are the most important part of the bible. | |
| | |
| | #14 (permalink) (top) |
![]() Molten Ash Posts: 101 | The only difficult part about that is how do you distinguish the made up crap from the real Jesus teachings. I suppose the stuff that actully makes sense and the crap. You guys should see this add on the bottom of my page, it says: Meet Christian Singles in Your City! Lmao |
| | |
| | #16 (permalink) (top) |
![]() Seeking the Unknown Location: Southern California Posts: 1,263 | ya, theres one for muslims too. A lot of stuff is done there. Anyway, this is off topic so i'll stop. From what I know of the teachings of Jesus, is that he preached to love your fellow man. So by hating Homosexuals and saying that god hates them, aren't they violating the teachings of Jesus? Knowledge is power, use it well. Don't fear the unknown, seek to understand it |
| | |
| | #18 (permalink) (top) |
| Igneous Magma Posts: 316 | It sure would be handy is we could warp the space-time continuum and check for Jesus, and if he was really there, borrow him for a few hours to validate all the stuff that has been attributed to him. Give the contradictions, I don't think *all* those were actually "his" precepts on various topics. |
| | |
| | #19 (permalink) (top) |
![]() Igneous Magma Posts: 207 | I think the confusion is caused by the commandments Moses was given. Perhaps the commandments given to Moses (in regard to people being put to death for a list of sins) were for that time and those people only? I don't know. I don't think we should let it trip us up though, because Jesus came after, and his teachings are so clear. |
| | |
| | #20 (permalink) (top) |
| Volcanic Erupter Posts: 8,663 | I agree that we should not stereotype all Chistians of sharing the views of one preson. Surely not all Christians would agree with the new "deadly sins" proposed by the Pope. Not all Chirstians would share the view of Pat Robinson, or the Watchtower, and so forth. And gays who are also Christians absolutly would not agree with that person who has a political agenda. |
| | |