Re: Redefining Christianity

[Ken Carman]

About a month ago I promised to publish an edition of Inspection that offered both conclusions about, and snippets from a previous thread on Volconvo called "Defining Christianity."

I'm sorry.

I'm sorry.


I'm sorry.

(There does that help, or do you want me to "kiss it.?" EWE! No thanks!)

Anyway, here is a link to the column, and below you will find that same link and one from Volconvo too. If the V one isn't there... be patient! I just haven't hit "publish" yet.

But, as an added incentive to discuss how we define Christianity, or if if you just wish to avoid reading the column, here's another discussion starter to sweeten the pot. (No, not "Jamaican," wiseguy!)


.

Do you feel that the definition of "Christian" is one subject to revision, or one that is solid and unchanging? Maybe it's "solid and unchanging" but we keep maturing and therefore understand it better, and more "in depth?" Or is that too complex and the answer "simple?"

All that, and the contents of the column, are on the table. Let's feast!